Endeavour?

Proposing all space photos are just CG or photoshopped is an easy way to explain away the NASA program but have you guys taken a trip to LA to see the fully functional Endeavour Shuttle?

  Seems like you'd be staring reality in the face simply looking at the actual capsules and space craft used to take many of the images you choose to ignore. 

Wow, a fake shuttle.  Who would have thought something like that could ever be constructed? 

Wow, a fake shuttle.  Who would have thought something like that could ever be constructed? 

To ignore evidence when it is presented is to show fear and ego, both stemming from insecurity.

Proposing all space photos are just CG or photoshopped is an easy way to explain away the NASA program but have you guys taken a trip to LA to see the fully functional Endeavour Shuttle?

  Seems like you'd be staring reality in the face simply looking at the actual capsules and space craft used to take many of the images you choose to ignore. 

My son has a Millennium Falcon.  Am I supposed to believe this thing is the actual one that flies in space?  And was part of a very mediocre movie?

'Cause that is exactly what you are saying in your post.

Quote from: Motorcycle Junky on January 22, 2016, 10:19:13 AM

Proposing all space photos are just CG or photoshopped is an easy way to explain away the NASA program but have you guys taken a trip to LA to see the fully functional Endeavour Shuttle?

  Seems like you'd be staring reality in the face simply looking at the actual capsules and space craft used to take many of the images you choose to ignore. 

My son has a Millennium Falcon.  Am I supposed to believe this thing is the actual one that flies in space?  And was part of a very mediocre movie?

'Cause that is exactly what you are saying in your post.

I don't know, does your son's Millennium Falcon come with a dead Han Solo? Derail with SWTFA spoilers :3

He sure looks dead.  He's all plastic-y and stiff.  At least he doesn't have a Star Killer planet thing that explodes at the push of a button.

Wow, a fake shuttle.  Who would have thought something like that could ever be constructed? 

Well that "fake" shuttle is a million times more "real" than the thousands of theoretical ground/atmospheric GPS transmitters that no one in all the GPS threads has produced (not even one).

Wow, a fake shuttle.  Who would have thought something like that could ever be constructed? 

This is literally all argument that is left for TFES

Hey, guys, look!  This proves that the space missions were real!

Jroa your not making the argument you think you are making

Hey look!  Proof the Space Shuttle was made of wood:

So by your guys logic, seeing a fully mission capable space craft in person with examples of the engines sitting out to touch first hand isn't enough.   So seeing fighter jets or anything else in person leave them open to be deemed fake because you don't want to believe they could fly.


You guys are funny.  The trolling is strong.  I sincerely hope you guys are just joking.   If not, I encourage you to go see the Endeavour in person. You will realize it's very much real and would complete shatter your baseless accusations.

The shuttle pictured in my post can be touched.  Engines and all.  It's also made partly of wood.  Am I supposed to believe that the Space Shuttle that flies in space is made of wood?

The shuttle pictured in my post can be touched.  Engines and all.  It's also made partly of wood.  Am I supposed to believe that the Space Shuttle that flies in space is made of wood?

It's a fallacy to claim that because one thing is made of wood something else must also made of wood.

Congrats on still not learning to comprehend.

Congrats on still not learning to comprehend.

That would be you that has zero comprehension.

Glad we are at an agreement that these two posts are worthless.

Quote from: Motorcycle Junky on January 22, 2016, 10:19:13 AM

Proposing all space photos are just CG or photoshopped is an easy way to explain away the NASA program but have you guys taken a trip to LA to see the fully functional Endeavour Shuttle?

  Seems like you'd be staring reality in the face simply looking at the actual capsules and space craft used to take many of the images you choose to ignore. 

My son has a Millennium Falcon.  Am I supposed to believe this thing is the actual one that flies in space?  And was part of a very mediocre movie?

'Cause that is exactly what you are saying in your post.

Hey, guys, look!  This proves that the space missions were real!

Ooh, ooh, don't forget this one:

Proposing all space photos are just CG or photoshopped is an easy way to explain away the NASA program but have you guys taken a trip to LA to see the fully functional Endeavour Shuttle?

  Seems like you'd be staring reality in the face simply looking at the actual capsules and space craft used to take many of the images you choose to ignore. 

Why do you always blame other people when you say something incorrect?

I didn't say anything incorrect. 

I do appreciate the constant attention you give me, however.  It makes me all warm and fuzzy inside.  Too bad for you, though, you always end up looking like an idiot.  If I didn't like the name 'Discount Chemist' so much, I might call you 'Lobster' or 'Crab' since you are so easy to trap.  I toss out the bait, click 'Show new replies to your posts' and sure enough, there you are.

I didn't say anything incorrect. 

If you are going to say you didn't say anything wrong, don't acknowledge you said something wrong in your previous post.

I do appreciate the constant attention you give me, however.  It makes me all warm and fuzzy inside.  Too bad for you, though, you always end up looking like an idiot.  If I didn't like the name 'Discount Chemist' so much, I might call you 'Lobster' or 'Crab' since you are so easy to trap.  I toss out the bait, click 'Show new replies to your posts' and sure enough, there you are.

Well I guess that's better than being a bottom feeder.

The Wright Brothers flight was a fallacy, too. Those "historic movies" you see were filmed using a model airplane in a sand box in a movie studio.
Therefore : Aircraft flights on the earth  are just as impossible as space flights.

If you are going to say you didn't say anything wrong, don't acknowledge you said something wrong in your previous post.

I didn't.   

Well I guess that's better than being a bottom feeder.

Sigh.  Crabs are considered bottom feeders, Discount Chemist.

The Wright Brothers flight was a fallacy, too. Those "historic movies" you see were filmed using a model airplane in a sand box in a movie studio.
Therefore : Aircraft flights on the earth  are just as impossible as space flights.

Haven't you learnt yet that TheEngineer never says anything, but he says it absolutely precisely?

While I liked your Wright Brothers analogy, the 777s and A320s etc that I have flown in seemed pretty real to me!
It's hard to hard argue against people that so love their little conspiracies!

Quote from: TheEngineer on January 23, 2016, 06:21:17 PM

Congrats on still not learning to comprehend.

....

Glad we are at an agreement that these two posts are worthless.

One of your posts.

Ooh, ooh, don't forget this one:
...

Quote from: sokarul on January 23, 2016, 07:21:18 PM

If you are going to say you didn't say anything wrong, don't acknowledge you said something wrong in your previous post.

I didn't.   

As you can see you did not say anything about your post not being worthless, you added another post to the worthless post list. Try and keep up.

Quote

Well I guess that's better than being a bottom feeder.

Sigh.  Crabs are considered bottom feeders, Discount Chemist.

Sigh. That's why I mentioned it. You called me a lobster and crab and then didn't call me a bottom feeder. That's like calling someone a skunk because they have white and black on.

Quote from: sokarul on January 23, 2016, 06:23:56 PM

Quote from: TheEngineer on January 23, 2016, 06:21:17 PM

Congrats on still not learning to comprehend.

....

Glad we are at an agreement that these two posts are worthless.

One of your posts.

Quote from: TheEngineer on January 23, 2016, 06:26:28 PM

Ooh, ooh, don't forget this one:
...

Quote from: TheEngineer on January 23, 2016, 08:05:34 PM

Quote from: sokarul on January 23, 2016, 07:21:18 PM

If you are going to say you didn't say anything wrong, don't acknowledge you said something wrong in your previous post.

I didn't.   

As you can see you did not say anything about your post not being worthless, you added another post to the worthless post list. Try and keep up.

As you can see you said "If you are going to say you didn't say anything wrong, don't acknowledge you said something wrong in your previous post."  Wrong does not mean worthless.  Apparently you still can't even keep your arguments straight.  Try to keep up with your own posts.

Sigh. That's why I mentioned it. You called me a lobster and crab and then didn't call me a bottom feeder. That's like calling someone a skunk because they have white and black on.

Lol!  This is the lamest attempt to back peddle from you in a while.  The sentences in this quote don't even make sense. 

Remember when I said these 'gotcha' games that you like to play with me always end up with you looking like an idiot?

Well, here are two more examples.

Quote from: sokarul on January 24, 2016, 09:19:23 AM

Quote from: sokarul on January 23, 2016, 06:23:56 PM

Quote from: TheEngineer on January 23, 2016, 06:21:17 PM

Congrats on still not learning to comprehend.

....

Glad we are at an agreement that these two posts are worthless.

One of your posts.

Quote from: TheEngineer on January 23, 2016, 06:26:28 PM

Ooh, ooh, don't forget this one:
...

Quote from: TheEngineer on January 23, 2016, 08:05:34 PM

Quote from: sokarul on January 23, 2016, 07:21:18 PM

If you are going to say you didn't say anything wrong, don't acknowledge you said something wrong in your previous post.

I didn't.   

As you can see you did not say anything about your post not being worthless, you added another post to the worthless post list. Try and keep up.

As you can see you said "If you are going to say you didn't say anything wrong, don't acknowledge you said something wrong in your previous post."  Wrong does not mean worthless.  Apparently you still can't even keep your arguments straight.  Try to keep up with your own posts.

They are worthless because you used a fallacy, which is incorrect.
But no, once again it's my fault you said something wrong.

Quote

Sigh. That's why I mentioned it. You called me a lobster and crab and then didn't call me a bottom feeder. That's like calling someone a skunk because they have white and black on.

Lol!  This is the lamest attempt to back peddle from you in a while.  The sentences in this quote don't even make sense. 

Remember when I said these 'gotcha' games that you like to play with me always end up with you looking like an idiot?

Well, here are two more examples.

Back peddalling? You are terrible at debating.

But no, once again it's my fault you said something wrong.

So you are saying you believe an incorrect ('wrong') post is the same thing as a worthless post?  You have said that at least twice now.  So to you, wrong = worthless.  Got it.

Back peddalling? You are terrible at debating.

Says the guy who posted this unintelligible quote:

Sigh. That's why I mentioned it. You called me a lobster and crab and then didn't call me a bottom feeder. That's like calling someone a skunk because they have white and black on.

Lol.  That one still makes me laugh.

Quote from: sokarul on January 24, 2016, 03:59:44 PM

But no, once again it's my fault you said something wrong.

So you are saying you believe an incorrect post is the same thing as a worthless post?  You have said that at least twice now.  So to you, incorrect = worthless.  Got it.

No. Another fallacy. I am saying your post was worthless because you used a fallacy. using a fallacy is incorrect.

Quote

Back peddalling? You are terrible at debating.

Says the guy who posted this unintelligible quote:

Quote from: sokarul on January 24, 2016, 09:19:23 AM

Sigh. That's why I mentioned it. You called me a lobster and crab and then didn't call me a bottom feeder. That's like calling someone a skunk because they have white and black on.

Lol.  That one still makes me laugh.

I guess if you need to laugh off your mistakes you will.

What's really funny is how your quest to find just one little mistake from me causes you to say some of the most idiotic stuff.  So, now that you have claimed a few times that I have used a fallacy, please provide the quote where I did so.  I'll wait.

What's really funny is how your quest to find just one little mistake from me causes you to say some of the most idiotic stuff.  So, now that you have claimed a few times that I have used a fallacy, please provide the quote where I did so.  I'll wait.

It's not a quest. All I have to do is read your posts and I can see they are wrong.

"My son has a Millennium Falcon.  Am I supposed to believe this thing is the actual one that flies in space?  And was part of a very mediocre movie?

'Cause that is exactly what you are saying in your post."

"So you are saying you believe an incorrect post is the same thing as a worthless post?  You have said that at least twice now.  So to you, incorrect = worthless.  Got it."