Creationism Explained (finally!)

  • 9 Replies
  • 2415 Views

?

Ubuntu

  • 2392
Creationism Explained (finally!)
« Reply #1 on: November 27, 2006, 04:31:59 PM »
We need more YouTube in this thread!


Creationism Explained (finally!)
« Reply #2 on: November 27, 2006, 05:17:48 PM »
Haha... I like this one:

ooyakasha!

Creationism Explained (finally!)
« Reply #3 on: November 27, 2006, 07:30:46 PM »
Wel,  of course there is this.

looks right except for the penguins. We al know where they realy come from  :wink:
quote="DiegoDraw"]"And Moses said unto his brethren: 'The Earth is flat!...biznatches,'" [/quote]
DOT INFO

Creationism Explained (finally!)
« Reply #4 on: November 27, 2006, 07:32:33 PM »
Hahahaha that one was funny.
ooyakasha!

Creationism Explained (finally!)
« Reply #5 on: November 27, 2006, 08:44:17 PM »
i think this is a very good video
quote="DiegoDraw"]"And Moses said unto his brethren: 'The Earth is flat!...biznatches,'" [/quote]
DOT INFO

Creationism Explained (finally!)
« Reply #6 on: November 27, 2006, 08:58:26 PM »
That guy was pretty funny in the 45 seconds I watched, but he's just plain wrong.  You can prove that God does not exist, provided that the definition given to God is self-refuting.  If a given person defines God with property A and then turns around and defines him with property ~A (that is, property "not" A), then the definition of the character itself proves that it cannot exist.  But whatever.
ooyakasha!

Creationism Explained (finally!)
« Reply #7 on: November 27, 2006, 10:49:03 PM »
That person is merely proving that his/her definition of God does not exist.

God has property A.  A is observed.  God exists.
But property ~A has also been observed.  God doesn't exist!

Ooops, paradox.

The bible is full of contradictions, if that's what you're referring to.  If we are to assume (I know, big assumption here) that the bible is, in itself, proof then we are left with the conclusion that it's just a big paradox.

God's omniscient, oh wait, no he's not.  But he is.  But he's not.
God is singular.  No, wait, this next line uses the plural.  But this one uses the singular.

The bible has a really sloppy editor.  But the assumption we've made, that it is proof of anything, is more a logical leap than I'm willing to take.  The idea that the bible is divine is taken from the bible itself.  Basically the argument is.. well... invalid in form.  The bible is true because it is the word of god. The bible is the word of God because the Bible says it is the word of god and is therefore true.  I hate circular arguments like that.

Still, the idea that some unseen intelligent power created our universe is possible, just not probable.  And having faith is just that, believing in the improbable.
on't just believe anything.  Believe what seems right.

?

Erasmus

  • The Elder Ones
  • 4242
Creationism Explained (finally!)
« Reply #8 on: November 28, 2006, 12:04:38 AM »
All of those videos you guys posted were totally lame, except for the Family Guy one.  Everybody doing the "I Dream of Genie" dance really sold me on the ID argument.
Why did the chicken cross the Möbius strip?

?

Ubuntu

  • 2392
Creationism Explained (finally!)
« Reply #9 on: November 29, 2006, 12:53:32 PM »