Full working diagram

I love all the people using this forum that show FE theorists for what it really is. Your serving the world by fighting people who cast down 1000s of years of science to suit there strange desires.

You know, I tried something like this once.
Once I realized how easy it is to do it the flat way, I tried to center gravity on a sphere and have things walk around on there.
It was much, much more difficult.
I'm not sure this proves anything, but I found it interesting.

Maybe I'm just a poor programmer.

You know, I tried something like this once.

Something like what?

Quote from: th3rm0m3t3r0 on January 09, 2016, 02:58:02 AM

You know, I tried something like this once.

Something like what?

Making a 3D simulated model of the flat Earth and round Earth from scratch.
I know it's a lot to ask of you (maybe it's over your head), Jim, but maybe you can try to imply meaning by context.
You know, since the thread is titled "Full working diagram".

Quote from: JimmyTheCrab on January 09, 2016, 03:03:45 AM

Quote from: th3rm0m3t3r0 on January 09, 2016, 02:58:02 AM

You know, I tried something like this once.

Something like what?

Making a 3D simulated model of the flat Earth and round Earth from scratch.
I know it's a lot to ask of you (maybe it's over your head), Jim, but maybe you can try to imply meaning by context.
You know, since the thread is titled "Full working diagram".

I'm also confused by what your saying. Are you saying you've tried to make both a flat earth and a round earth diagram and the round earth one was the harder one to get to work?

You don't have to try and make a round earth diagram, there are piles of them already working that takes into account every aspect of the universe that we see with are own eyes, But as for flat earth diagrams there are zero meeting that degrees of detail and functionality.

If you tried to make a full working flat earth diagram could you share it or your findings and where you got stumped?

Quote from: JimmyTheCrab on January 09, 2016, 03:03:45 AM

Quote from: th3rm0m3t3r0 on January 09, 2016, 02:58:02 AM

You know, I tried something like this once.

Something like what?

Making a 3D simulated model of the flat Earth and round Earth from scratch.

Hey, just checking, you're posts aren't particularly intelligible.

You know, I tried something like this once.
Once I realized how easy it is to do it the flat way,

So, want to show what you came up with?  I'm guessing you won't, and the dog ate your simulation, or something...but I might as well ask.


The OP wanted a diagram that showed:

... the orbit of the sun, moon, planets and stars, the phases of the moon and inner planets. The flipped view of the moon and sky per hemesphere ect.

But I'd be really impressed if your "3D simulated model" just demonstrated how a sunset could ever happen or how the sun stays the same apparent size all the time.  I mean, what equation did you use for the atmospheric sun magnification stuff?  It's maths that have eluded the best flat scientists in the society, yet you must have cracked it.

Come on th3rm0m3t3r0, show us what you got!  I'm actually quite excited. 

There is one slight problem.  Even they cannot agree on a map of the flat earth to base this 3D working model on.  Should it be single sided, double-sided (JRoweSkeptic) or single sided with both North Pole and South Pole (Sandokhan, I think)?

Soooo nothing yet. Well I think I may be done on these forums. this is admittance they can't back up there claims.