Universal Accelerator - how it works?

When did we change the topic from how the UA works to equivalence principle discussion?

3rd page and we are still at where we started - nowhere.

Sorry, guilty as charged.  In mitigation I was trying to show that the application of UA to even the flat earth is invalid!

Brouwer is so mad and angry.  I am sorry for defeating your round Earth beliefs.  Why do you always get so defensive when you are defeated?  I think I answered my own question.  lol

Brouwer is so mad and angry.  I am sorry for defeating your round Earth beliefs.  Why do you always get so defensive when you are defeated?  I think I answered my own question.  lol

I don't agree that you are defeating our round Earth beliefs.  UA itself must be a constant acceleration.
My whole point has been that I fail to see how the "gravitational forces" of the moving celestial bodies can possibly explain how the gravitational field on earth is predictably lower at high altitude and higher at each pole.
Surely if the variations from a constant were due to the moving celestial bodies then these variations would move around the earth and not stay in the same location as observed.
Also no-one has ever given a sensible rebuttal of the original Cavendish experiment or the numerous later experiment that give quite consistent results. 
This is not to claim that all gravitation or even the universal gravitational constant is completely understood.  In fact the measuments of the "universal gravitational constant" appear to show a very slight periodic variation over time, yet no sign of long term variation - as yet there is no explanation of this (that I know of).

I know I run the risk of what I accuse many FE supporters (esp Charles and Jeranism!) of, that is a failure to under the opposing model - I try to understand it, hence these questions.
See http://phys.org/news/2015-04-gravitational-constant-vary.html if you want more ammunition!

You are not Brouwer, are you?  An alt, maybe? 

Quote from: sokarul on January 01, 2016, 10:02:12 AM

Quote from: jroa on January 01, 2016, 04:48:21 AM

You seem to be under the impression that the Equivalence Principle is the only force in the FE universe. 

Only an idiot would think the EP is a force.

Things tend to accelerate much easier when a force is applied. 

What does thathave to do with the stupid claim that the EP is a force?

Quote from: jroa on January 02, 2016, 12:33:08 AM

Quote from: sokarul on January 01, 2016, 10:02:12 AM

Quote from: jroa on January 01, 2016, 04:48:21 AM

You seem to be under the impression that the Equivalence Principle is the only force in the FE universe. 

Only an idiot would think the EP is a force.

Things tend to accelerate much easier when a force is applied. 

What does thathave to do with the stupid claim that the EP is a force?

What do any of your shitposts have to do with anything? 

I see you learned your lesson.

I see you learned your lesson.

That your shitposts mean nothing?  I learned that years ago. 

If you say something stupid you will be called out on it. That is not a shitpost, it's you having no clue what you are talking about.

Have you ever looked in the mirror?  Just wondering.  lol

You are not Brouwer, are you?  An alt, maybe?

No, but you claimed t have defeated "round Earth" beliefs - I believe I have a right to answer that.

Quote from: jroa on January 04, 2016, 07:51:49 PM

You are not Brouwer, are you?  An alt, maybe?

No, but you claimed t have defeated "round Earth" beliefs - I believe I have a right to answer that.

Please, provide a citation for these outlandish claims. 

Brouwer is so mad and angry.  I am sorry for defeating your round Earth beliefs.  Why do you always get so defensive when you are defeated?  I think I answered my own question.  lol

jroa, please stop derailing the thread and making low content posts. If you look for a place for that, go to complete nonsense or angry ratings. Based on your post data, you like those places.

This thread is about UA from the FE model, not about round beliefes. We are debating UA principles. ONLY.

And again, asking about the FE model details I received NOTHING.

What makes me mad and angry is a complete lack of the ability to provide straight and direct answers to simply stated questions. I cannot even discuss because there are no real answers to anything.

Have you ever looked in the mirror?  Just wondering.  lol

The words of a defeated baby.

Quote from: jroa on January 04, 2016, 09:21:37 PM

Have you ever looked in the mirror?  Just wondering.  lol

The words of a defeated baby.

Let me know if you ever come to NC and I can show you how much of a baby I am, indoor socker boy. 

Quote from: sokarul on January 04, 2016, 09:52:53 PM

Quote from: jroa on January 04, 2016, 09:21:37 PM

Have you ever looked in the mirror?  Just wondering.  lol

The words of a defeated baby.

Let me know if you ever come to NC and I can show you how much of a baby I am, indoor socker boy.

Rofl.

Quote from: jroa on January 04, 2016, 06:47:07 PM

Brouwer is so mad and angry.  I am sorry for defeating your round Earth beliefs.  Why do you always get so defensive when you are defeated?  I think I answered my own question.  lol

jroa, please stop derailing the thread and making low content posts. If you look for a place for that, go to complete nonsense or angry ratings. Based on your post data, you like those places.

This thread is about UA from the FE model, not about round beliefes. We are debating UA principles. ONLY.

And again, asking about the FE model details I received NOTHING.

What makes me mad and angry is a complete lack of the ability to provide straight and direct answers to simply stated questions. I cannot even discuss because there are no real answers to anything.

Blah blah blah, everything anybody says is irrelevant and derailment.  Blah blah blah. 

Quote from: jroa on January 04, 2016, 06:47:07 PM

Brouwer is so mad and angry.  I am sorry for defeating your round Earth beliefs.  Why do you always get so defensive when you are defeated?  I think I answered my own question.  lol

jroa, please stop derailing the thread and making low content posts. If you look for a place for that, go to complete nonsense or angry ratings. Based on your post data, you like those places.

This thread is about UA from the FE model, not about round beliefes. We are debating UA principles. ONLY.

And again, asking about the FE model details I received NOTHING.

What makes me mad and angry is a complete lack of the ability to provide straight and direct answers to simply stated questions. I cannot even discuss because there are no real answers to anything.

I already shut him up when I pointed out that if the UA was a force it would accelerate different masses at different rates.

Oh, I am sorry.  Did sokarul say something that he thought was intelligent?  lol

Oh, I am sorry.  Did sokarul say something that he thought was intelligent?  lol

rofl
I would run away too if I was you.

Quote from: jroa on January 04, 2016, 10:04:13 PM

Oh, I am sorry.  Did sokarul say something that he thought was intelligent?  lol

rofl
I would run away too if I was you.

Pee boy is getting mad?  Perhaps you should contact the admins again so I can't post the picture that you posted again?  lol

yawn

Please stop posting low content in the serious fora.  You have been warned and banned for this in the past.  Did you not learn your lesson? 

If the UA is a force, it would accelerate different masses at different rates. Thus the moon and sun could not be locked in planes above the earth.

Please, cite your sources for this outlandish claim. 

F=m*a

where

F equals force
m equals mass
a equals acceleration

F=m*a

where

F equals force
m equals mass
a equals acceleration

lol, nice citation. 

Are you having trouble with the simple equation?

No, but you seem to be having trouble understanding what a source is.  lol. 

No, but you seem to be having trouble understanding what a source is.  lol.

You seem to think a source is required. It is not. Now do you have an actual rebuttal or or you just going to waste my time?