Give me your top ten proofs for a flat earth

Quote from: EternalHoid on December 23, 2015, 07:13:38 AM

With plum bobs they would have to be placed over a large distance to notice a difference in their direction.
The diameter of the earth is 12742 km, so over 10 meters the angle between two plum lines is 0.000028 degrees. Thats a horizontal slant of 28 micrometers, thats the length of a few bacteria. Not going to have a noticeable effect.
Also your logic is wrong, I'll use your faulty logic to show you why. On a flat earth the ground is flat and gravity is directly down. So the line should follow the shape of the earth and stay flat, but it doesn't, it concaves, so the earth is concave. We are on the inside of a sphere. :-)

Care to add your BS earth rottation cock head . If what you stated was true water would never settel . The stringline sags in the" middle " because its fall is directly downward  & not to a spherical center of mass . Remove the supporting  ends & the stringline full length would fall at the same rate .

1. Whether or not the earth is spinning has little to do with whether or not the earth is a globe. FYI I think that the earth is spinning and orbiting the sun.

2. The law of motion states that a object in motion will remain in motion until acted upon by a force. Do balloons lay back as you drive down the highway and the balloons are inside? This is basic physics that you should've learned in middle school.

Quote from: charles bloomington on December 23, 2015, 11:55:45 AM

Quote from: EternalHoid on December 23, 2015, 07:13:38 AM

With plum bobs they would have to be placed over a large distance to notice a difference in their direction.
The diameter of the earth is 12742 km, so over 10 meters the angle between two plum lines is 0.000028 degrees. Thats a horizontal slant of 28 micrometers, thats the length of a few bacteria. Not going to have a noticeable effect.
Also your logic is wrong, I'll use your faulty logic to show you why. On a flat earth the ground is flat and gravity is directly down. So the line should follow the shape of the earth and stay flat, but it doesn't, it concaves, so the earth is concave. We are on the inside of a sphere. :-)

Care to add your BS earth rottation cock head . If what you stated was true water would never settel . The stringline sags in the" middle " because its fall is directly downward  & not to a spherical center of mass . Remove the supporting  ends & the stringline full length would fall at the same rate .

1. Whether or not the earth is spinning has little to do with whether or not the earth is a globe. FYI I think that the earth is spinning and orbiting the sun.

2. The law of motion states that a object in motion will remain in motion until acted upon by a force. Do balloons lay back as you drive down the highway and the balloons are inside? This is basic physics that you should've learned in middle school.

Tends to remain in motion, big difference from Will remain in motion .

Quote from: Luke 22:35-38 on December 23, 2015, 12:09:05 PM

Quote from: charles bloomington on December 23, 2015, 11:55:45 AM

Quote from: EternalHoid on December 23, 2015, 07:13:38 AM

With plum bobs they would have to be placed over a large distance to notice a difference in their direction.
The diameter of the earth is 12742 km, so over 10 meters the angle between two plum lines is 0.000028 degrees. Thats a horizontal slant of 28 micrometers, thats the length of a few bacteria. Not going to have a noticeable effect.
Also your logic is wrong, I'll use your faulty logic to show you why. On a flat earth the ground is flat and gravity is directly down. So the line should follow the shape of the earth and stay flat, but it doesn't, it concaves, so the earth is concave. We are on the inside of a sphere. :-)

Care to add your BS earth rottation cock head . If what you stated was true water would never settel . The stringline sags in the" middle " because its fall is directly downward  & not to a spherical center of mass . Remove the supporting  ends & the stringline full length would fall at the same rate .

1. Whether or not the earth is spinning has little to do with whether or not the earth is a globe. FYI I think that the earth is spinning and orbiting the sun.

2. The law of motion states that a object in motion will remain in motion until acted upon by a force. Do balloons lay back as you drive down the highway and the balloons are inside? This is basic physics that you should've learned in middle school.

Tends to remain in motion, big difference from Will remain in motion .

And what force is acting on the plum bobs?

Lets get a dozen people to spread out from one another & drop a metal ball. Who's ball fell vertically true & whos fell with a lean on it.?

Again if two balls were to be dropped 10m apart and 1m above the ground, they will land 10m minus 28 micrometers apart. Nothing noticeable.

Again if two balls were to be dropped 10m apart and 1m above the ground, they will land 10m minus 28 micrometers apart. Nothing noticeable.

Did you add your bs spin on that . Who out of those two had his ball falling vertically true.? Both of them or neither.
Tell me how you get water to settle. If we go by the shit your talking .

You know that question makes no sence, what is falling true, all the balls go straight down, straight down is just a different direction for each ball.
With water settling, im guessing your talking about when I said the earth is concave, that was a joke about your string argument.

Quote from: EternalHoid on December 23, 2015, 12:29:13 PM

Again if two balls were to be dropped 10m apart and 1m above the ground, they will land 10m minus 28 micrometers apart. Nothing noticeable.

Did you add your bs spin on that . Who out of those two had his ball falling vertically true.? Both of them or neither.
Tell me how you get water to settle. If we go by the **** your talking .

Ok, by your standards how far apart should the plum bobs/balls have to be in order to see a difference?

Again if two balls were to be dropped 10m apart and 1m above the ground, they will land 10m minus 28 micrometers apart. Nothing noticeable.

Kind of odd how this does not, in fact, happen then, like with the Tamarack Mine Experiments.

Quote from: EternalHoid on December 23, 2015, 12:29:13 PM

Again if two balls were to be dropped 10m apart and 1m above the ground, they will land 10m minus 28 micrometers apart. Nothing noticeable.

Kind of odd how this does not, in fact, happen then, like with the Tamarack Mine Experiments.

I admit, it makes for an interesting read.

You know that question makes no sence, what is falling true, all the balls go straight down, straight down is just a different direction for each ball.
With water settling, im guessing your talking about when I said the earth is concave, that was a joke about your string argument.

You have just stated all the balls go straight down.  & then go on to say, just a different direction for each ball . Then they are not going straight down , are they. How can they if you drop  them simultaneously & to complicate matters further you add rottation.  You have to be insane to believe in  such a  nonsensical model  or being paid !!!! A large some of Money to promote it,

Quote from: charles bloomington on December 23, 2015, 11:55:45 AM

Quote from: EternalHoid on December 23, 2015, 07:13:38 AM

With plum bobs they would have to be placed over a large distance to notice a difference in their direction.
The diameter of the earth is 12742 km, so over 10 meters the angle between two plum lines is 0.000028 degrees. Thats a horizontal slant of 28 micrometers, thats the length of a few bacteria. Not going to have a noticeable effect.
Also your logic is wrong, I'll use your faulty logic to show you why. On a flat earth the ground is flat and gravity is directly down. So the line should follow the shape of the earth and stay flat, but it doesn't, it concaves, so the earth is concave. We are on the inside of a sphere. :-)

Care to add your BS earth rottation cock head . If what you stated was true water would never settel . The stringline sags in the" middle " because its fall is directly downward  & not to a spherical center of mass . Remove the supporting  ends & the stringline full length would fall at the same rate .

1. Whether or not the earth is spinning has little to do with whether or not the earth is a globe. FYI I think that the earth is spinning and orbiting the sun.

2. The law of motion states that a object in motion will remain in motion until acted upon by a force. Do balloons lay back as you drive down the highway and the balloons are inside? This is basic physics that you should've learned in middle school.

No you dont think, you just parrot. Like  a moronic puppet.  Tell me have  you ever had an original thought? , of course you haven't. Because it obvious your just parroting the nonsence you have been feed.

Quote from: Luke 22:35-38 on December 23, 2015, 12:09:05 PM

Quote from: charles bloomington on December 23, 2015, 11:55:45 AM

Quote from: EternalHoid on December 23, 2015, 07:13:38 AM

With plum bobs they would have to be placed over a large distance to notice a difference in their direction.
The diameter of the earth is 12742 km, so over 10 meters the angle between two plum lines is 0.000028 degrees. Thats a horizontal slant of 28 micrometers, thats the length of a few bacteria. Not going to have a noticeable effect.
Also your logic is wrong, I'll use your faulty logic to show you why. On a flat earth the ground is flat and gravity is directly down. So the line should follow the shape of the earth and stay flat, but it doesn't, it concaves, so the earth is concave. We are on the inside of a sphere. :-)

Care to add your BS earth rottation cock head . If what you stated was true water would never settel . The stringline sags in the" middle " because its fall is directly downward  & not to a spherical center of mass . Remove the supporting  ends & the stringline full length would fall at the same rate .

1. Whether or not the earth is spinning has little to do with whether or not the earth is a globe. FYI I think that the earth is spinning and orbiting the sun.

2. The law of motion states that a object in motion will remain in motion until acted upon by a force. Do balloons lay back as you drive down the highway and the balloons are inside? This is basic physics that you should've learned in middle school.

No you dont think, you just parrot. Like  a moronic puppet.  Tell me have  you ever had an original thought? , of course you haven't. Because it obvious your just parroting the nonsence you have been feed.

Way to insult me. So you lack a logical valid argument and try to tear me down with ad Hominems?

Quote from: charles bloomington on December 23, 2015, 07:14:23 PM

Quote from: Luke 22:35-38 on December 23, 2015, 12:09:05 PM

Quote from: charles bloomington on December 23, 2015, 11:55:45 AM

Quote from: EternalHoid on December 23, 2015, 07:13:38 AM

With plum bobs they would have to be placed over a large distance to notice a difference in their direction.
The diameter of the earth is 12742 km, so over 10 meters the angle between two plum lines is 0.000028 degrees. Thats a horizontal slant of 28 micrometers, thats the length of a few bacteria. Not going to have a noticeable effect.
Also your logic is wrong, I'll use your faulty logic to show you why. On a flat earth the ground is flat and gravity is directly down. So the line should follow the shape of the earth and stay flat, but it doesn't, it concaves, so the earth is concave. We are on the inside of a sphere. :-)

Care to add your BS earth rottation cock head . If what you stated was true water would never settel . The stringline sags in the" middle " because its fall is directly downward  & not to a spherical center of mass . Remove the supporting  ends & the stringline full length would fall at the same rate .

1. Whether or not the earth is spinning has little to do with whether or not the earth is a globe. FYI I think that the earth is spinning and orbiting the sun.

2. The law of motion states that a object in motion will remain in motion until acted upon by a force. Do balloons lay back as you drive down the highway and the balloons are inside? This is basic physics that you should've learned in middle school.

No you dont think, you just parrot. Like  a moronic puppet.  Tell me have  you ever had an original thought? , of course you haven't. Because it obvious your just parroting the nonsence you have been feed.

Way to insult me. So you lack a logical valid argument and try to tear me down with ad Hominems?

Well the shoes seems to fit perfect on you Cinderella.

Quote from: EternalHoid on December 23, 2015, 12:42:48 PM

You know that question makes no sence, what is falling true, all the balls go straight down, straight down is just a different direction for each ball.
With water settling, im guessing your talking about when I said the earth is concave, that was a joke about your string argument.

You have just stated all the balls go straight down.  & then go on to say, just a different direction for each ball . Then they are not going straight down , are they. How can they if you drop  them simultaneously & to complicate matters further you add rottation.  You have to be insane to believe in  such a  nonsensical model  or being paid !!!! A large some of Money to promote it,

*facepalm* Since the earth is a sphere straight down is a different direction depending where you are, if by straight down you mean the direction towards the center of the earth.

Quote from: charles bloomington on December 23, 2015, 06:18:26 PM

Quote from: EternalHoid on December 23, 2015, 12:42:48 PM

You know that question makes no sence, what is falling true, all the balls go straight down, straight down is just a different direction for each ball.
With water settling, im guessing your talking about when I said the earth is concave, that was a joke about your string argument.

You have just stated all the balls go straight down.  & then go on to say, just a different direction for each ball . Then they are not going straight down , are they. How can they if you drop  them simultaneously & to complicate matters further you add rottation.  You have to be insane to believe in  such a  nonsensical model  or being paid !!!! A large some of Money to promote it,

*facepalm* Since the earth is a sphere straight down is a different direction depending where you are, if by straight down you mean the direction towards the center of the earth.

Since the  earth is a sphere is total conjecture on your part. Provide the physical evidence.  That your conjecture is correct.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foucault_pendulum
http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/glossary/coriolis_effect.html
http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2015/06/03/coriolis_effect_proving_it_does_work_differently_in_different_hemispheres.html
Many people have set up Foucault pendulums, and if you have a friend in a different hemisphere you can check the coriolis effect yourselves.

Quote from: Luke 22:35-38 on December 23, 2015, 07:19:14 PM

Quote from: charles bloomington on December 23, 2015, 07:14:23 PM

Quote from: Luke 22:35-38 on December 23, 2015, 12:09:05 PM

Quote from: charles bloomington on December 23, 2015, 11:55:45 AM

Quote from: EternalHoid on December 23, 2015, 07:13:38 AM

With plum bobs they would have to be placed over a large distance to notice a difference in their direction.
The diameter of the earth is 12742 km, so over 10 meters the angle between two plum lines is 0.000028 degrees. Thats a horizontal slant of 28 micrometers, thats the length of a few bacteria. Not going to have a noticeable effect.
Also your logic is wrong, I'll use your faulty logic to show you why. On a flat earth the ground is flat and gravity is directly down. So the line should follow the shape of the earth and stay flat, but it doesn't, it concaves, so the earth is concave. We are on the inside of a sphere. :-)

Care to add your BS earth rottation cock head . If what you stated was true water would never settel . The stringline sags in the" middle " because its fall is directly downward  & not to a spherical center of mass . Remove the supporting  ends & the stringline full length would fall at the same rate .

1. Whether or not the earth is spinning has little to do with whether or not the earth is a globe. FYI I think that the earth is spinning and orbiting the sun.

2. The law of motion states that a object in motion will remain in motion until acted upon by a force. Do balloons lay back as you drive down the highway and the balloons are inside? This is basic physics that you should've learned in middle school.

No you dont think, you just parrot. Like  a moronic puppet.  Tell me have  you ever had an original thought? , of course you haven't. Because it obvious your just parroting the nonsence you have been feed.

Way to insult me. So you lack a logical valid argument and try to tear me down with ad Hominems?

Well the shoes seems to fit perfect on you Cinderella.

1. That's another fallacy. It's tu Quoque.

2. That's not true. When did I attack you or anyone else personally?


Also, in my defense I do think for myself. The passage my username is after thinking for myself literal. I used to think that guns were only for police and military until I thought for myself.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foucault_pendulum
http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/glossary/coriolis_effect.html
http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2015/06/03/coriolis_effect_proving_it_does_work_differently_in_different_hemispheres.html
Many people have set up Foucault pendulums, and if you have a friend in a different hemisphere you can check the coriolis effect yourselves.

Back on foucault pendulum again are we. It doesn't swing perpetual never has & never will , which makes the cliams based on it ,a fraudulent misrepesented lie. In fact it proves the earth is not rottating on an axis. The rottation of the pendulum is due to torque being developed at the pivoting point from the swinging action of the bob.

Quote from: EternalHoid on December 24, 2015, 06:57:33 AM

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foucault_pendulum
http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/glossary/coriolis_effect.html
http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2015/06/03/coriolis_effect_proving_it_does_work_differently_in_different_hemispheres.html
Many people have set up Foucault pendulums, and if you have a friend in a different hemisphere you can check the coriolis effect yourselves.

Back on foucault pendulum again are we. It doesn't swing perpetual never has & never will , which makes the cliams based on it ,a fraudulent misrepesented lie. In fact it proves the earth is not rottating on an axis.

I can even go watch one in a Fort Worth CHILDREN'S museum if I wanted. Are my eyes lying to me now?

Quote from: EternalHoid on December 24, 2015, 06:57:33 AM

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foucault_pendulum
http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/glossary/coriolis_effect.html
http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2015/06/03/coriolis_effect_proving_it_does_work_differently_in_different_hemispheres.html
Many people have set up Foucault pendulums, and if you have a friend in a different hemisphere you can check the coriolis effect yourselves.

Back on foucault pendulum again are we. It doesn't swing perpetual never has & never will , which makes the cliams based on it ,a fraudulent misrepesented lie. In fact it proves the earth is not rottating on an axis.

  Sure it does, its frame rotates relative to the bob. It proves earths spin and in what direction the spin is.

Quote from: EternalHoid on December 24, 2015, 06:57:33 AM

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foucault_pendulum
http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/glossary/coriolis_effect.html
http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2015/06/03/coriolis_effect_proving_it_does_work_differently_in_different_hemispheres.html
Many people have set up Foucault pendulums, and if you have a friend in a different hemisphere you can check the coriolis effect yourselves.

Back on foucault pendulum again are we. It doesn't swing perpetual never has & never will , which makes the claims based on it ,a fraudulent misrepesented lie. In fact it proves the earth is not rottating on an axis. The rotation of the pendulum is due to torque being developed at the pivoting point from the swinging action of the bob.

It moves because it moves.

Quote from: charles bloomington on December 24, 2015, 11:46:35 AM

Quote from: EternalHoid on December 24, 2015, 06:57:33 AM

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foucault_pendulum
http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/glossary/coriolis_effect.html
http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2015/06/03/coriolis_effect_proving_it_does_work_differently_in_different_hemispheres.html
Many people have set up Foucault pendulums, and if you have a friend in a different hemisphere you can check the coriolis effect yourselves.

Back on foucault pendulum again are we. It doesn't swing perpetual never has & never will , which makes the cliams based on it ,a fraudulent misrepesented lie. In fact it proves the earth is not rottating on an axis.

  Sure it does, its frame rotates relative to the bob. It proves earths spin and in what direction the spin is.

The only earth, spin is the churched up nonsence your spinning., Torque devalops at pivoting points with angular motion  , your foucault pendulum is no different .

Quote from: charles bloomington on December 24, 2015, 11:46:35 AM

Quote from: EternalHoid on December 24, 2015, 06:57:33 AM

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foucault_pendulum
http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/glossary/coriolis_effect.html
http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2015/06/03/coriolis_effect_proving_it_does_work_differently_in_different_hemispheres.html
Many people have set up Foucault pendulums, and if you have a friend in a different hemisphere you can check the coriolis effect yourselves.

Back on foucault pendulum again are we. It doesn't swing perpetual never has & never will , which makes the cliams based on it ,a fraudulent misrepesented lie. In fact it proves the earth is not rottating on an axis.

I can even go watch one in a Fort Worth CHILDREN'S museum if I wanted. Are my eyes lying to me now?

Is it swinging back & forth for a 24 hour period unassisted .of course its not you fooled  idiot.

You say this, yet it works, as scientifically it should. Go check one out. so simple, so easy, so clever.  

Also the amount of time taken for the pendulum to rotate 360 degrees can be calculated from the latitude. How come the time taken to rotate 360 can be calculated in advance if the angular momentum comes from it being dropped incorrectly.

Also the amount of time taken for the pendulum to rotate 360 degrees can be calculated from the latitude. How come the time taken to rotate 360 can be calculated in advance if the angular momentum comes from it being dropped incorrectly.

Aether! LMFAO

Quote from: CaptainMagpie on December 24, 2015, 11:50:38 AM

Quote from: charles bloomington on December 24, 2015, 11:46:35 AM

Quote from: EternalHoid on December 24, 2015, 06:57:33 AM

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foucault_pendulum
http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/glossary/coriolis_effect.html
http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2015/06/03/coriolis_effect_proving_it_does_work_differently_in_different_hemispheres.html
Many people have set up Foucault pendulums, and if you have a friend in a different hemisphere you can check the coriolis effect yourselves.

Back on foucault pendulum again are we. It doesn't swing perpetual never has & never will , which makes the cliams based on it ,a fraudulent misrepesented lie. In fact it proves the earth is not rottating on an axis.

I can even go watch one in a Fort Worth CHILDREN'S museum if I wanted. Are my eyes lying to me now?

Is it swinging back & forth for a 24 hour period unassisted .of course its not you fooled  idiot.

It's precisely because dumb people think they are smarter than smart people that they are dumb.  You would do well to learn from your su-peer-iors.

Quote from: charles bloomington on December 24, 2015, 12:13:56 PM

Quote from: CaptainMagpie on December 24, 2015, 11:50:38 AM

Quote from: charles bloomington on December 24, 2015, 11:46:35 AM

Quote from: EternalHoid on December 24, 2015, 06:57:33 AM

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foucault_pendulum
http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/glossary/coriolis_effect.html
http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2015/06/03/coriolis_effect_proving_it_does_work_differently_in_different_hemispheres.html
Many people have set up Foucault pendulums, and if you have a friend in a different hemisphere you can check the coriolis effect yourselves.

Back on foucault pendulum again are we. It doesn't swing perpetual never has & never will , which makes the cliams based on it ,a fraudulent misrepesented lie. In fact it proves the earth is not rottating on an axis.

I can even go watch one in a Fort Worth CHILDREN'S museum if I wanted. Are my eyes lying to me now?

Is it swinging back & forth for a 24 hour period unassisted .of course its not you fooled  idiot.

It's precisely because dumb people think they are smarter than smart people that they are dumb.  You would do well to learn from your su-peer-iors.

So you won't be wan't to buy one of my perpetual generators that will produce 3kva , to power your home. Yer im just a dumb penguin 

Charls

Above post is a confirmation of your stupidity, not intelligence.

If you understood physics, you would know that energy cannot be created from nothing, the best you could ever hope for is 99.9 percent efficiency.

I don't ever want to set eyes on your snake oil perpetual generator. when the tech is available to make a 90% efficient generator for my home at a reasonable price that will return its value in my lifetime... I will build it.