JRoweSkeptic and DEF problem

  • 6 Replies
  • 1325 Views
?

Jadyyn

  • 1533
  • +0/-0
JRoweSkeptic and DEF problem
« on: December 23, 2015, 07:11:38 AM »
Since the traditional, single disk FE model is destroyed (DEF blows it off with just a hand-wave) - you can't see the S. Celestial Pole from above the disk, hence DEF with 2 poles to the rescue - DEF is THE FE model. Like JRoweSkeptic's sig says - "Dual Earth Theory (sic), the best FE model"

The funniest thing is that ONLY JRoweSkeptic, out of ALL the people on Earth understands it! ONE person! THAT is the Flat Earth Society. If he dies, FE dies too...

Problem?
“If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.” W.C. Fields.
"The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it."
"What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."

*

Luke 22:35-38

  • 3608
  • +0/-0
  • The earth is a globe, DUH! prove its not
Re: JRoweSkeptic and DEF problem
« Reply #1 on: December 23, 2015, 08:34:53 AM »
We already have enough DET threads. But this should be interesting anyway. BTW it's anyway not anyways. Just a little grammar lesson.
The Bible doesn't support a flat earth.

Scripture, facts, science, stats, and logic is how I argue.

*

TheGreatGray

  • 110
  • +0/-0
  • Spherical Earth Forever
Re: JRoweSkeptic and DEF problem
« Reply #2 on: December 23, 2015, 09:22:51 AM »
Since the traditional, single disk FE model is destroyed (DEF blows it off with just a hand-wave) - you can't see the S. Celestial Pole from above the disk, hence DEF with 2 poles to the rescue - DEF is THE FE model. Like JRoweSkeptic's sig says - "Dual Earth Theory (sic), the best FE model"

The funniest thing is that ONLY JRoweSkeptic, out of ALL the people on Earth understands it! ONE person! THAT is the Flat Earth Society. If he dies, FE dies too...

Problem?
Yeah, that's hilarious. One person is not the only one in the entire world to know its shape in 2015. But remember if Einstein had died early his theories would have died with him. However, someone else certainly would have continued it or discovered it independently. The question is, after jrowe is gone, will anyone continue it...

I understand the intention of this post but I can't help but feel it's a bit... Personal.
God forbid anyone challenge your beliefs, lest you be forced to defend or change them.

*

JRoweSkeptic

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 5407
  • +0/-0
  • DET Developer
Re: JRoweSkeptic and DEF problem
« Reply #3 on: December 23, 2015, 09:26:54 AM »
The question is, after jrowe is gone, will anyone continue it...
And there's the baseless assertion Jadyyn bases his whining on.

Quote
I understand the intention of this post but I can't help but feel it's a bit... Personal.
He doesn't have any actual argument. It's just childish: he knows he's blocked and yet he desperately feels the need to spam the forum and post lies and ridiculous questions and DET knowing full well I'm sick of debating with him, and won't see his to call him out on them. He knows where to go if he wants an actual answer, yet he refuses to: because he's not interested in knowing what he's talking about.

Just ignore Jadyyn's whinging. Maybe he'll grow up and go away.
http://fet.wikia.com
dualearththeory.proboards.com/
On the sister site if you want to talk.

?

Jadyyn

  • 1533
  • +0/-0
Re: JRoweSkeptic and DEF problem
« Reply #4 on: December 23, 2015, 09:48:53 AM »
JRoweSkeptic wants REAL believers, not trolls. He doesn't care how many people believe in DEF. THAT is a problem for the FE society per my OP.

My point was if he leaves/dies/whatever, DEF goes with him. What does the FE society have then?

I am not sure what "personal" means. As DEF is the "only kid on the block" and JRowe is the only person that fully understands it and debates it, I guess every REer is "personally" arguing with him. He certainly takes it that way from his responses.
“If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.” W.C. Fields.
"The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it."
"What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."

?

Jadyyn

  • 1533
  • +0/-0
Re: JRoweSkeptic and DEF problem
« Reply #5 on: December 23, 2015, 12:36:25 PM »
One more thing...

I believe that the DEF was a mistake. It was a trolling attempt gone horribly wrong. The problem is it explains more things than the traditional single plane FE model. That is why JRoweSkeptic can simply brush off the traditional model with a hand-wave. That is why it is just like an essay with some drawings on a napkin. It was not expected to be formalized.

With DEF getting more traction being THE FE model, it needs to be more developed. Since JRoweSkeptic is the only one who understands it, he basically has locked himself into this website arguing day-by-day its merits. I hope he is getting paid for his new job (7x365). He now has to be here or The FE Society comes to a grinding halt. This was not what was intended or expected. Funny but sad.
“If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.” W.C. Fields.
"The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it."
"What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."

*

CaptainMagpie

  • 331
  • +0/-0
  • Aristibird of Knowledge
Re: JRoweSkeptic and DEF problem
« Reply #6 on: December 23, 2015, 01:04:23 PM »
It's just so ridiculous when you break it down and think about it that there is no way he can be really serious. I've thought for a while this had to be a troll and he just keeps it going.
fuck off penguin.  I'll take my ban to tell you to go fuck your self.  Ban please.   I am waiting.