You asked for questions - I am asking. You should include answers for these in your FAQ later on.
READ THE OP FUCKWIT. I addressed your questions, only two are remotely relevant, the rest are either answered or more evasion from you.
You present (1) a definition of evidence, that I quoted and (2) a balloon test that has not been conducted, as evidence.
I present evidence, after clarifying what is meant by evidence. You just completely and consistently refuse to try to read, and yet you're still whinging as if you know ANYTHING.
The tests are simply to demonstrate DET makes predictions and is falsifiable, which you so love to lie about.
My examples above hold. They are observational, per your definition, that is all I need. I can also specify tests that I will not perform as evidence. Although, viewing the Sun, Moon and planets in the sky is a falsifiable test that is performed daily by everyone on Earth and falsifies/disproves DEF as even a hypothesis.
LEARN TO READ FUCKWIT. Given we observe EXACTLY what is predicted by DET, that is evidence in favor of DET. of course, someone like you who is only interested in dishonesty and using a straw man EVEN AFTER EBING EXPLICITLY CORRECTED wouldn't understand.
HOW ABOUT YOU TRY TO ACTUALLY LEARN THE MODEL YOU PATHETIC penguin?!
JRoweSkeptic, I just love how we're calmly burning your fantasy to ashes, and all you can come up with to say is just all-caps blunt insults. Looks like you're one the losing side for on- wait- you always were.
I HAVE ADDRESSED ALL OF YORU BULLSHIT. THE FACT I AM SICK OF DEALING WITH penguinS LIKE YOU WHO CAN'T DO ANYTHING EXCEPT LIE AND EVADE AND CONSTRUCT STRAW MEN MAKES ME HUMAN, NO MORE AND NO LESS?
IF YOU ARE SO SECURE IN SAYING DET IS FALSE WHY ARE YOU INCAPABLE OF ANY HONEST DISCUSSION ABOUT IT?! INSTEAD YOU DERAIL A THREAD THAT IS MEANT TO IMPROVE THE MODEL, YOU LIE, YOU WHINE, AND YOU ACT LIKE COMPLETE HYPOCRITES. WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU!?