Don't know why nobody thought of this before. Now you can see for yourself what we're talking about.
Uh, because there's an openly available link that's far easier to access in the OP, rather than midway down a random page?
I wanted to learn the model. That is why I read your brief description. From the very beginning to the very end. I found few things I wanted to ask, because they did not make a sense or I was not sure how to understand them. Thanks for trash answer ("learn the model" thing over and over).
What you said was EXPLICITLY addressed in the model, and anyone who actually read it would see it. Do you think you wouldn't get called out on lies?
I will call you out on bullshit if that's all you provide. All you did was demand that I repeat what was already clearly explained in the model, and I'm sick of REers like you who think it's somehow funny to demand I waste my time.
Thanks for not explaining anything.
I answered all your questions, and those that were not were explained in the model. What I said was easily verifiable, but of course, you refuse to check that, and you just sit there content in the fact no REer will call you out on your lies. If you're so secure in your model why is all you rely on dishonest tactics?
I do lose my temper sometimes, as anyone would when dealing with the number of arrogant penguins and trolls on this forum, so I may have spoken harsher than you necessarily needed, but the fact remains most of what you asked was EXPLICITLY ADDRESSED IN THE MODEL. Consider reading and occasionally double-checking rather than skimming once and considering yourself an expert.
That was alot of my time to actually read DEF, I have answered your request, even tho I didn't need to to prove my point.
You very much did need to: if you are going to make a claim, the most basic thing for you to do would be to know what it is you're talking about. Why is that somehow a controversial statement?!
You were lying about DET, and doing so with no understanding of anything you said: you simply assumed it was wrong. Assertion has no place in any debate.
Now I demand that you respond to this or I'll know you are not serious about DEF, either way I win.
Win what? The ISS/satellite argument has been debunked countless times by even classical FET. Unless you have more than a tired old stock argument, DET stands.