Thanx JRoweSkeptic for replying.
I've also read the theory proposed by u, actually the aether part was quite interesting as I also personally believe that (only the aether part), as no proof generally exists till now depicting the exact nature of space, we can propose our theories, some believe it to b a fabric but as its 3D, aether fits with density and concentration difference concept. But the picture u posted (hand made model) of DET please upload another one that is well labeled and explain much more, I only see poles above and below the sun and moon ( in fact sun drawn bigger then moon). And lines crossing them I didn't got your imagination, I will appreciate if u do so.
Well the above said content is not the part of debate as I don't know much about DET, I can't comment on it right now but I will b happy to discuss in near future.
I picked up most general points from all the FET models. But everyone of those theories are based on misconceptions in the mind of developer, I.e. The concepts are not clear about the world renown RET, the discussions going in the forum calling it RET, most of the people calling it RET I bet don't even know about the shape that is oblate spheroid of the earth .
Please this is my req to all those people who make a theory only keeping a certain points in mind, and then defend it, stop doing that. A theory is only acceptable if it satisfy all observations/phenomenon and facts and are based on thorough research, not only imagination.
Well coming back to debate as my first observation of FET ( sun moon also flat) was flagged true and I believe most of flat earthers believe that. I will point some flaws in this very basic point claimed by all flat earthers, that will prove this whole theory wrong, that sun is like a torch pointing some of the area of the earth. That perfectly explains the concept of day night. Some even made concepts about weather that's fine.
But actually u guys missed a universal truth, of geometry I.e. A disc when looked upon sideways seem elliptical. But sun/moon looks circular at every time of the day/ night resp..
And guys explained solar eclipse very well. But none I've found explaining lunar eclipse all says that shadow satellite of sun blocks moon. And again they say that satellite object moves in very close orbit to sun, is that a joke , they mean that moon is even closer to sun at the time of eclipse then that of shadow satellite, wait they don't stop here they say that all three are aligned, lol even a bigger joke .
If all three are aligned during lunar eclipse there should b no day on the other half of earth.
And further more 24 hrs daylight is not explained over Antarctica, it's not even 24 hrs, days extend to months there. And so as with night. They explain it via multiple sun theory lmao.
It's like create anything out of your mind and add it to your theory without any fact proving it.
Optical illusions are refered to 2nd sun.
It's ok I will let u guys live in imagination.
Guys one thing I will point here, many people like u send your kids to school , where they learn this RET and other stuff ,and some of those kids are currently working in NASA, And other space agencies around the world. Some even own private observatories. Are they all mad? They have done Ph.D. In that area of study, Ph.D. It's like independent research with full mind and hence got worldwide recognition.
Start home schooling your kids I am sure school is also a govt conspiracy to make u follow wrong facts right from beginning.
rofl.
Making a hoax theory and misleading others is easy my friends, but some people have spent their entire lifetime giving mankind light of knowledge, at least respect them by just not saying it a govt. conspiracy.
There go your first and very basic point.