Explain why the stars look different in different hemispheres

  • 85 Replies
  • 26843 Views
*

TheEarthIsASphere.

  • 867
  • +0/-0
  • who fucking cares what shape the earth is lol
Re: Explain why the stars look different in different hemispheres
« Reply #60 on: November 12, 2015, 12:18:07 PM »
Astrology isn't a fact.
I find it interesting you say that, and forgot to omit your line about not accepting an answer based on 'DET', I've only seen a little about that, but there's about as much proof as there is for your round earth.

FET isn't a fact either. So, where does it gets us?
Wrong.

Nope. You're wrong.

We have over 2000 years of evidence to back up a round Earth model. We had mathematical proofs, we had physical experiments, people have observed the effects one sees on a round Earth. At this point, a round Earth isn't a "theory". It's a fact.

The flat Earth conspiracy "theory" has been nothing but a bunch of crazies running around, claiming the Earth is flat, and then changing their model every hundred years or so, because it doesn't work with the presented facts. This happens more often today due to even more scientific and mathematical discoveries. In short, unless you can back up your "flat Earth model" with physical, scientific, and mathematical evidence, of which I can call "falsified", "stupid", or "blasphemous" like you flat Earthers do, the flat Earth "theory" will remain as a nothing but a pretty little story. An un-ideal pretty little story at that.

You keep telling yourself that.

I will keep telling myself that. After all, I actually took, and payed attention in history class. Why don't you touch yourself up on that before assuming it's wrong.
History and science are different topics.

Yes, but there's also a thing called "history of science/mathematics". I'm not even sure why you felt the need to state that.
Quā ratiōne nōn redimus ad senectēs societātēs sapientium patrum? Quā ratiōne relinquimus eārum sapientiam?

?

Jadyyn

  • 1533
  • +0/-0
Re: Explain why the stars look different in different hemispheres
« Reply #61 on: November 12, 2015, 02:46:34 PM »
What the heck is UFET?  Is that something you just made up?
Sorry, just saw this...

If you talk about DEF (hemiplane), you should know what UFET is "uniplanar FET" (disk with dome on top).
“If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.” W.C. Fields.
"The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it."
"What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: Explain why the stars look different in different hemispheres
« Reply #62 on: November 12, 2015, 02:55:21 PM »
What the heck is UFET?  Is that something you just made up?
Sorry, just saw this...

If you talk about DEF (hemiplane), you should know what UFET is "uniplanar FET" (disk with dome on top).

Oh, so you did actually just make it up.  Thanks for explaining. 

?

Jadyyn

  • 1533
  • +0/-0
Re: Explain why the stars look different in different hemispheres
« Reply #63 on: November 12, 2015, 03:00:32 PM »
Also, keep that DET bullshit out of here. I don't want to hear it. There's no proof for it, whatsoever.
"FET has an answer, but I don't want to hear it, so I'll just reject a model I haven't tried to learn and so cannot possibly know whether it is justified or not!"
Except your model has no proof. There's physical, mathematical, or scientific proof to back it up. Unless you can back it up, then I don't want to hear it.
How can you possibly make such a claim given you haven't learnt the model?
It has the same evidence behind every scientific theory, lacking only that which requires resources I do not have. Observational evidence: it forms an explanation for all observations, and does so without unnecessary assumptions.
Without observational evidence, you really can't prove that it's correct. I think it's just a load of bullshit assumptions anyways.
Good thing I explicitly said it possesses observational evidence.
You don't know the model. If you're going to make such grand claims in light of that, your dishonesty is on full display.
Observational evidence can be mathematical. All those theories have been mathematically proven. If JRoweSkeptic can prove his model mathematically, then I might be inclined to believe it.
It has the same evidence behind every scientific theory, lacking only that which requires resources I do not have. [/u]
Math can't be made up on the spur of the moment, or with no resources, no matter what you seem to believe. That's not going to change the fact the model works, and a mathematical description is allowed for.
Well it is out there now, so we will see if what he said is true. (https://forum.tfes.org/index.php?topic=3040.0) If it has been out there since June, why did you not want me to share the same thing you PM'd me? I was quite surprised Googling "Duel Earth Theory" to find it publicly available.

Now you will have to justify your responses.
“If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.” W.C. Fields.
"The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it."
"What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."

?

Jadyyn

  • 1533
  • +0/-0
Re: Explain why the stars look different in different hemispheres
« Reply #64 on: November 12, 2015, 03:06:13 PM »
What the heck is UFET?  Is that something you just made up?
Sorry, just saw this...

If you talk about DEF (hemiplane), you should know what UFET is "uniplanar FET" (disk with dome on top).

Oh, so you did actually just make it up.  Thanks for explaining.
Actually, JRoweSkeptic just made it up. He even says it "falls quickly." I called it UFET to differentiate it from DEF (DEF > UFET). You are welcome.

There is no dome. The dome model of a FE is uniplanar, and such theories fall quickly.
“If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.” W.C. Fields.
"The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it."
"What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: Explain why the stars look different in different hemispheres
« Reply #65 on: November 12, 2015, 04:21:39 PM »
What the heck is UFET?  Is that something you just made up?
Sorry, just saw this...

If you talk about DEF (hemiplane), you should know what UFET is "uniplanar FET" (disk with dome on top).

Oh, so you did actually just make it up.  Thanks for explaining.
Actually, JRoweSkeptic just made it up. He even says it "falls quickly." I called it UFET to differentiate it from DEF (DEF > UFET). You are welcome.

There is no dome. The dome model of a FE is uniplanar, and such theories fall quickly.

Are you saying that you think one person speaks for the whole society?  Your own scientists can't agree with each other, but we are held to a higher standard, are we not? 

*

JRoweSkeptic

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 5407
  • +0/-0
  • DET Developer
Re: Explain why the stars look different in different hemispheres
« Reply #66 on: November 13, 2015, 05:27:10 AM »
Quote
I never claimed FET has no answers. FET do have answers, I agree, however they are just against every observation and therefore are false.
Wasn't talking to you, fuckwit.

Quote
Can we throw out DEF too?
It has 2 axioms:
How about you stop whining about a model you don't know the slightest fucking thing about? Seriously, why is it so hard to get you to stop spewing bullshit? oh, I know, you're an ignorant dishonest penguin. Fuck off already.

Quote
How can you claim someone did not learn the model? Can you read minds over a distance?
Well, when you claim utter bullshit and pretend DET states that, it's pretty bloody obvious you haven't learnt the model.

Quote
If it has been out there since June, why did you not want me to share the same thing you PM'd me? I was quite surprised Googling "Duel Earth Theory" to find it publicly available.
Because I've talked about it openly before, moron. I've told you this. i also explained, in detail and multiple times, the problem with trying to explain a model via wall of text and forum full of trolls, as you consistently ignore. Seriously, do you have an honest bone in your body?!

Quote
Actually, JRoweSkeptic just made it up. He even says it "falls quickly." I called it UFET to differentiate it from DEF (DEF > UFET). You are welcome.
I've never used the phrase UFET, that's your invention, and a bizarre one.
http://fet.wikia.com
dualearththeory.proboards.com/
On the sister site if you want to talk.

?

Jadyyn

  • 1533
  • +0/-0
Re: Explain why the stars look different in different hemispheres
« Reply #67 on: November 13, 2015, 01:01:39 PM »
What the heck is UFET?  Is that something you just made up?
Sorry, just saw this...

If you talk about DEF (hemiplane), you should know what UFET is "uniplanar FET" (disk with dome on top).

Oh, so you did actually just make it up.  Thanks for explaining.
Actually, JRoweSkeptic just made it up. He even says it "falls quickly." I called it UFET to differentiate it from DEF (DEF > UFET). You are welcome.

There is no dome. The dome model of a FE is uniplanar, and such theories fall quickly.

Are you saying that you think one person speaks for the whole society?  Your own scientists can't agree with each other, but we are held to a higher standard, are we not?
I was answering your question. You said I made it up - no JRoweSkeptic did.

Your questions are further derailment. What do they have to do with the OP?
“If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.” W.C. Fields.
"The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it."
"What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."

*

Kirk Johnson

  • 582
  • +0/-0
Re: Explain why the stars look different in different hemispheres
« Reply #68 on: November 13, 2015, 01:22:47 PM »
Are you saying that you think one person speaks for the whole society? Your own scientists can't agree with each other, but we are held to a higher standard, are we not?

Agreed. FE is not a serious theory, it is even rejected by science, so there's no way one person can speak for the whole society.

?

Jadyyn

  • 1533
  • +0/-0
Re: Explain why the stars look different in different hemispheres
« Reply #69 on: November 13, 2015, 01:26:32 PM »
Quote
Quote
Quote
all the other BS that your scientists can think up without observational evidence?
Can we throw out DEF too?
It has 2 axioms:
How about you stop whining about a model you don't know the slightest fucking thing about? Seriously, why is it so hard to get you to stop spewing bullshit? oh, I know, you're an ignorant dishonest penguin. Fuck off already.
You are willing to throw out other real theories and hypotheses without observational evidence. DEF has none about its foundational axioms - the Sun/Moon in the Earth and Aether. Why does your argument not work on DEF? Are you a hypocrite? Are you trying to prove it is a hypothesis/theory or just leaving it as a fantasy - no proof required.

BS. I've read your wall of text. I know plenty about your fantasy and now, so do other people. We CAN read. They can judge whether I am misinterpreting or "bastardizing" anything. It is not just your "say so" anymore.
Quote
Quote
If it has been out there since June, why did you not want me to share the same thing you PM'd me? I was quite surprised Googling "Duel Earth Theory" to find it publicly available.
Because I've talked about it openly before, moron. I've told you this. i also explained, in detail and multiple times, the problem with trying to explain a model via wall of text and forum full of trolls, as you consistently ignore. Seriously, do you have an honest bone in your body?!
That is not what you said. You said to "PM me" if you want it - implying you had something different, more developed. You sent me the link to some other website and asked me not to share it - I haven't. Hence my surprise to find it publicly available (basically unchanged from what you sent me) and you talking about it there, MONTHS ago. Do you have an honest bone in your body?

So, has anyone actually been PMing JR? What have you learned? The "DET - discussions" seems to ONLY have me discussing DEF initially. Now with the wall of text, others are BEGINNING to discuss it openly (again).
Quote
Quote
Actually, JRoweSkeptic just made it up. He even says it "falls quickly." I called it UFET to differentiate it from DEF (DEF > UFET). You are welcome.
I've never used the phrase UFET, that's your invention, and a bizarre one.
Do you comprehend what you read? That IS my invention to differentiate it from DEF in discussions. What is bizarre about abbreviating uniplanar Flat Earth Theory as UFET? We obviously have very different definitions of "bizarre". Like the Sun/Moon inside the Earth and Aether - are what? normal? not bizarre?
“If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.” W.C. Fields.
"The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it."
"What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."

*

JRoweSkeptic

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 5407
  • +0/-0
  • DET Developer
Re: Explain why the stars look different in different hemispheres
« Reply #70 on: November 13, 2015, 03:20:08 PM »
Quote
there's no way one person can speak for the whole society.
I don't claim to, fuckwit.

Quote
DEF has none about its foundational axioms - the Sun/Moon in the Earth and Aether. Why does your argument not work on DEF? Are you a hypocrite? Are you trying to prove it is a hypothesis/theory or just leaving it as a fantasy - no proof required.
No matter how much you whinge about the theory, that doesn't make it true. You have already been told how the former is a deduction from observations and the aether, and if you had read anything about the aether you would see how its properties are themselves deductions. I am not a hypocrite, you are just a liar.

Quote
That is not what you said. You said to "PM me" if you want it - implying you had something different, more developed. You sent me the link to some other website and asked me not to share it - I haven't. Hence my surprise to find it publicly available (basically unchanged from what you sent me) and you talking about it there, MONTHS ago. Do you have an honest bone in your body?
So the fact I did not sort out my internet history to find every place I have mentioned the theory and try and remember every password I used is now damning? You really are pathetic. Did you never consider that there was a reason I knew that the wall of text method of teaching DET didn't work?
No, wait, you do know that, I FUCKING TOLD YOU THAT. Can you do anything except lie? yes, the model is outlined elsewhere, because I developed it publicly. When it became apparent discussions that way were impossible, due to trolls, morons like you who don't bother to read a word, and the problems with just putting down a wall of text on a forum post, I began to consider my current system, which you seem to have devoted every waking hour to ruining and whining about because you're an insecure fuck.
http://fet.wikia.com
dualearththeory.proboards.com/
On the sister site if you want to talk.

?

Jadyyn

  • 1533
  • +0/-0
Re: Explain why the stars look different in different hemispheres
« Reply #71 on: November 13, 2015, 03:41:43 PM »
The good news JRoweSkeptic is that I don't give a damn anymore about your DEF FANTASY. I am done wasting my time on it. If you provide falsifiable testable evidence, I will readdress DEF.
“If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.” W.C. Fields.
"The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it."
"What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."

*

JRoweSkeptic

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 5407
  • +0/-0
  • DET Developer
Re: Explain why the stars look different in different hemispheres
« Reply #72 on: November 13, 2015, 03:43:40 PM »
The good news JRoweSkeptic is that I don't give a damn anymore about your DEF FANTASY. I am done wasting my time on it. If you provide falsifiable testable evidence, I will readdress DEF.

Provide those tests for what you believ: God and RET would be good start. When you demonstrate you are not a hypocrite, I'll be happy to oblige.
And of course you're forgetting I've given you said tests multiple times. About what I expect.
http://fet.wikia.com
dualearththeory.proboards.com/
On the sister site if you want to talk.

?

Jadyyn

  • 1533
  • +0/-0
Re: Explain why the stars look different in different hemispheres
« Reply #73 on: November 13, 2015, 04:22:44 PM »
Kirk Johnson: are you implying that someone at each of those points can simultaneously see the same stars at the same time?

Local time, yes. They can see it during night.

So, then the stars are not over all three of those places simultaneously, and therefore revolve, correct?
Incorrect. Sigma Octanis revolves in a VERY VERY small "orbit" around the S. Celestial Pole (a point in the sky above the S. Pole). (http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0007/startrails_aat1.jpg) It does not revolve 50,000+ mi around the Earth.

So, how exactly is the S. Celestial Pole a single point above the S. Pole when the S. Pole is 50,000+ miles long?
“If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.” W.C. Fields.
"The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it."
"What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: Explain why the stars look different in different hemispheres
« Reply #74 on: November 13, 2015, 04:26:35 PM »
Kirk Johnson: are you implying that someone at each of those points can simultaneously see the same stars at the same time?

Local time, yes. They can see it during night.

So, then the stars are not over all three of those places simultaneously, and therefore revolve, correct?
Incorrect. Sigma Octanis revolves in a VERY VERY small "orbit" around the S. Celestial Pole (a point in the sky above the S. Pole). (http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0007/startrails_aat1.jpg) It does not revolve 50,000+ mi around the Earth.

So, how exactly is the S. Celestial Pole a single point above the S. Pole when the S. Pole is 50,000+ miles long?

What?  Are you claiming that the distance away from something dictates the object's orbit?  Are you really a retard, or just pretending to be one? 

?

Jadyyn

  • 1533
  • +0/-0
Re: Explain why the stars look different in different hemispheres
« Reply #75 on: November 13, 2015, 05:44:24 PM »
Kirk Johnson: are you implying that someone at each of those points can simultaneously see the same stars at the same time?

Local time, yes. They can see it during night.

So, then the stars are not over all three of those places simultaneously, and therefore revolve, correct?
Incorrect. Sigma Octanis revolves in a VERY VERY small "orbit" around the S. Celestial Pole (a point in the sky above the S. Pole). (http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0007/startrails_aat1.jpg) It does not revolve 50,000+ mi around the Earth.

So, how exactly is the S. Celestial Pole a single point above the S. Pole when the S. Pole is 50,000+ miles long?

What?  Are you claiming that the distance away from something dictates the object's orbit?  Are you really a retard, or just pretending to be one?
What are you talking about? The tiny orbit, as shown in the picture, is around the S. Celestial Pole (SCP). The SCP Pole is a point in the middle of star trail pictures. Sigma Octanis is close by it. Both the star and SCP are POINTS. How can they be points - stationary in the sky - and travel in an arcs 50,000+ mi long? By the equator (Celestial Equator above it), stars do make 25,000+ mi arcs in the sky. Polaris does not. Sigma Octanis, like Polaris, does not. In star trail pictures, the NCP and SCP are stationary points. As stars get closer to the equator, their arcs get bigger. The longest arcs are the stars above the equator. JR, you really don't know anything about astronomy do you? Or are you the one pretending?
“If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.” W.C. Fields.
"The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it."
"What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: Explain why the stars look different in different hemispheres
« Reply #76 on: November 14, 2015, 03:41:22 AM »
Kirk Johnson: are you implying that someone at each of those points can simultaneously see the same stars at the same time?

Local time, yes. They can see it during night.

So, then the stars are not over all three of those places simultaneously, and therefore revolve, correct?
Incorrect. Sigma Octanis revolves in a VERY VERY small "orbit" around the S. Celestial Pole (a point in the sky above the S. Pole). (http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0007/startrails_aat1.jpg) It does not revolve 50,000+ mi around the Earth.

So, how exactly is the S. Celestial Pole a single point above the S. Pole when the S. Pole is 50,000+ miles long?

What?  Are you claiming that the distance away from something dictates the object's orbit?  Are you really a retard, or just pretending to be one?
What are you talking about? The tiny orbit, as shown in the picture, is around the S. Celestial Pole (SCP). The SCP Pole is a point in the middle of star trail pictures. Sigma Octanis is close by it. Both the star and SCP are POINTS. How can they be points - stationary in the sky - and travel in an arcs 50,000+ mi long? By the equator (Celestial Equator above it), stars do make 25,000+ mi arcs in the sky. Polaris does not. Sigma Octanis, like Polaris, does not. In star trail pictures, the NCP and SCP are stationary points. As stars get closer to the equator, their arcs get bigger. The longest arcs are the stars above the equator. JR, you really don't know anything about astronomy do you? Or are you the one pretending?

Oh, so you were just lying, once again.  Thanks for manning up, for a change. 

?

Jadyyn

  • 1533
  • +0/-0
Re: Explain why the stars look different in different hemispheres
« Reply #77 on: November 14, 2015, 08:28:55 AM »
Kirk Johnson: are you implying that someone at each of those points can simultaneously see the same stars at the same time?

Local time, yes. They can see it during night.

So, then the stars are not over all three of those places simultaneously, and therefore revolve, correct?
Incorrect. Sigma Octanis revolves in a VERY VERY small "orbit" around the S. Celestial Pole (a point in the sky above the S. Pole). (http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0007/startrails_aat1.jpg) It does not revolve 50,000+ mi around the Earth.

So, how exactly is the S. Celestial Pole a single point above the S. Pole when the S. Pole is 50,000+ miles long?

What?  Are you claiming that the distance away from something dictates the object's orbit?  Are you really a retard, or just pretending to be one?
What are you talking about? The tiny orbit, as shown in the picture, is around the S. Celestial Pole (SCP). The SCP Pole is a point in the middle of star trail pictures. Sigma Octanis is close by it. Both the star and SCP are POINTS. How can they be points - stationary in the sky - and travel in an arcs 50,000+ mi long? By the equator (Celestial Equator above it), stars do make 25,000+ mi arcs in the sky. Polaris does not. Sigma Octanis, like Polaris, does not. In star trail pictures, the NCP and SCP are stationary points. As stars get closer to the equator, their arcs get bigger. The longest arcs are the stars above the equator. JR, you really don't know anything about astronomy do you? Or are you the one pretending?

Oh, so you were just lying, once again.  Thanks for manning up, for a change.
Stop with the vague random statements. Be specific. What lying? Everything I said was true.

So, how does Sigma Octanis appear in the sky as (1) a star, a point and (2) barely move around the SCP (3) and travel 50,000+ miles by the Antarctic coast (4) thereby creating a 50,000+ mi arc in the sky that we do not observe?
“If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.” W.C. Fields.
"The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it."
"What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: Explain why the stars look different in different hemispheres
« Reply #78 on: November 14, 2015, 11:34:10 PM »
Kirk Johnson: are you implying that someone at each of those points can simultaneously see the same stars at the same time?

Local time, yes. They can see it during night.

So, then the stars are not over all three of those places simultaneously, and therefore revolve, correct?
Incorrect. Sigma Octanis revolves in a VERY VERY small "orbit" around the S. Celestial Pole (a point in the sky above the S. Pole). (http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0007/startrails_aat1.jpg) It does not revolve 50,000+ mi around the Earth.

So, how exactly is the S. Celestial Pole a single point above the S. Pole when the S. Pole is 50,000+ miles long?

What?  Are you claiming that the distance away from something dictates the object's orbit?  Are you really a retard, or just pretending to be one?
What are you talking about? The tiny orbit, as shown in the picture, is around the S. Celestial Pole (SCP). The SCP Pole is a point in the middle of star trail pictures. Sigma Octanis is close by it. Both the star and SCP are POINTS. How can they be points - stationary in the sky - and travel in an arcs 50,000+ mi long? By the equator (Celestial Equator above it), stars do make 25,000+ mi arcs in the sky. Polaris does not. Sigma Octanis, like Polaris, does not. In star trail pictures, the NCP and SCP are stationary points. As stars get closer to the equator, their arcs get bigger. The longest arcs are the stars above the equator. JR, you really don't know anything about astronomy do you? Or are you the one pretending?

Oh, so you were just lying, once again.  Thanks for manning up, for a change.
Stop with the vague random statements. Be specific. What lying? Everything I said was true.

So, how does Sigma Octanis appear in the sky as (1) a star, a point and (2) barely move around the SCP (3) and travel 50,000+ miles by the Antarctic coast (4) thereby creating a 50,000+ mi arc in the sky that we do not observe?

Now, you want for me to explain your own lies to you?  I don't have time for these games of yours. 

?

Jadyyn

  • 1533
  • +0/-0
Re: Explain why the stars look different in different hemispheres
« Reply #79 on: November 15, 2015, 07:30:27 AM »
So, no response - just name calling. jroa loses! UFET disproved, again!
“If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.” W.C. Fields.
"The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it."
"What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."

*

TheEarthIsASphere.

  • 867
  • +0/-0
  • who fucking cares what shape the earth is lol
Re: Explain why the stars look different in different hemispheres
« Reply #80 on: November 15, 2015, 08:31:07 AM »
You know, Jroa, Jadyyn has a point. Every time somebody comes up with a piece of proof that wholly disproves a flat Earth model, you resort to saying completely out-of-context, insulting, or rude statements just to stall because you know you're wrong.
Quā ratiōne nōn redimus ad senectēs societātēs sapientium patrum? Quā ratiōne relinquimus eārum sapientiam?

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: Explain why the stars look different in different hemispheres
« Reply #81 on: November 15, 2015, 08:40:23 AM »
You know, Jroa, Jadyyn has a point. Every time somebody comes up with a piece of proof that wholly disproves a flat Earth model, you resort to saying completely out-of-context, insulting, or rude statements just to stall because you know you're wrong.

I busted Jadyyn in a lie, and he tried to squirm his way out.  Now, you are trying to back your buddy up.  When will the lies stop? 

*

TheEarthIsASphere.

  • 867
  • +0/-0
  • who fucking cares what shape the earth is lol
Re: Explain why the stars look different in different hemispheres
« Reply #82 on: November 15, 2015, 08:52:52 AM »
You know, Jroa, Jadyyn has a point. Every time somebody comes up with a piece of proof that wholly disproves a flat Earth model, you resort to saying completely out-of-context, insulting, or rude statements just to stall because you know you're wrong.

I busted Jadyyn in a lie, and he tried to squirm his way out.  Now, you are trying to back your buddy up.  When will the lies stop?

When will your asshat arrogant attitude die down?
Quā ratiōne nōn redimus ad senectēs societātēs sapientium patrum? Quā ratiōne relinquimus eārum sapientiam?

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: Explain why the stars look different in different hemispheres
« Reply #83 on: November 15, 2015, 08:57:06 AM »
You know, Jroa, Jadyyn has a point. Every time somebody comes up with a piece of proof that wholly disproves a flat Earth model, you resort to saying completely out-of-context, insulting, or rude statements just to stall because you know you're wrong.

I busted Jadyyn in a lie, and he tried to squirm his way out.  Now, you are trying to back your buddy up.  When will the lies stop?

When will your asshat arrogant attitude die down?

You are the one who comes to the Flat Earth Society to argue with flat Earthers, probably because it makes you feel somehow superior because you think that our beliefs can easily be refuted.  When you are met with counter evidence, you then cry and claim that we are not playing fair.  Who is the arrogant one here? 

*

Kirk Johnson

  • 582
  • +0/-0
Re: Explain why the stars look different in different hemispheres
« Reply #84 on: November 15, 2015, 09:18:12 AM »
You know, Jroa, Jadyyn has a point. Every time somebody comes up with a piece of proof that wholly disproves a flat Earth model, you resort to saying completely out-of-context, insulting, or rude statements just to stall because you know you're wrong.

I busted Jadyyn in a lie, and he tried to squirm his way out.  Now, you are trying to back your buddy up.  When will the lies stop?

Roundies busted "thebigone" multiple lies at the "despressure" topic and none had been arrogant in doing so. Or maybe roundies simply don't have time to adjust their attitude since "thebigone" never stopped lying.

?

Jadyyn

  • 1533
  • +0/-0
Re: Explain why the stars look different in different hemispheres
« Reply #85 on: November 15, 2015, 10:17:39 AM »
You know, Jroa, Jadyyn has a point. Every time somebody comes up with a piece of proof that wholly disproves a flat Earth model, you resort to saying completely out-of-context, insulting, or rude statements just to stall because you know you're wrong.

I busted Jadyyn in a lie, and he tried to squirm his way out.  Now, you are trying to back your buddy up.  When will the lies stop?
First, a lie is deliberate. People make mistakes or are ignorant. You must prove someone deliberately knows something before you can make such a claim. Most FEers just call people liars - randomly.

*I* don't even know what lie you are referring to.

Second, I am still waiting for your answer to my question in Reply #77.
“If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.” W.C. Fields.
"The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it."
"What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."