Your own scientists invent theories to explain things that can only be observed but never tested. Why are we held to a different standard? Do you think we are Omnipotent?
I do not own any scientist, as owning a person (sounds like a thing) is called slavery.
You don't need to be Omnipotent to solve a problem. You just need to be creative and be able to create a logic reasoning.
Within 7 years a process, that "looks" fairly simple, has not been touched. Why? Ignoring this works against FET as it just creates another hole people from outside can stick too and point out over and over. This is why I see many videos trying to explain that in FET, but they all fail to do it. Seeing yet another wrong explaination decreases creditibility of FET science and people, who claim they understand the theory and want to share their models and explainations.
This is true that scientists often create theories, but they think of experiments and other things, like
theoretical apporach, that can help understaning and explaining things. They don't leave them in sketch for the rest
of eternity.
The stars rotate above earth centered on the north pole.
With proper meaning that is correct.
Could you be more specific above the type of motion you're questioning?
I am not questioning anything (this is Q&A section, not discussion), I am looking for a model in FE that explains why stars move like we observe. Like the legendary, 1000 asked, motion around the south pole (of the sky).