People on skateboards.

  • 2251 Replies
  • 410990 Views
*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1110 on: December 16, 2015, 08:02:17 PM »
Learn what a smart phone is and report back.
Too bad for you a smart phone is not smart enough to overcome your idiocy.
lol

Quote
Quote
I literally explained it to you in the quote.  “You think you proved a science argument thereby proving general relativity.” The proof vs evidence debate we had. You can't prove an argument by using General Relativity because you would have to prove General Relativity and you can't prove theories.
'Literally explained' what?  I asked for you to provide the quote.
After I had already explained it to you. Like I said, you think you can prove scientific arguments.

Quote
Quote
Strange, you figured it out just fine.
I have 3 kids; I'm used to deciphering gibberish.
I care so much.

Quote
Quote
But no, chemists you work with would not write papers on their results
Really?  Then why do I have a stack of reports written by chemists on the results of experiments I have asked for?  Maybe only real chemists write reports.
Results would be worthless without more information. Like I said, reports contain more parts of the scientific method. Stop editing out parts of quotes. It's dishonest.

Quote
Quote
How many of them write their papers on iPhones?
I would assume none.  Are you trying to blame you smart phone for your inability to properly convey a message?  That's lame.
No, I'm blaming he typos on it.

Quote
Quote
It's funny though, you changes from saying I’m always wrong to saying I suck at everything.
I gave you too much credit apparently.
No, you just claim I'm always wrong and then post typos.
 
Quote
So, I'm still waiting for that quote...
Pay attention. You think you can prove an argument using general relativity. This would imply general relativity has been proven. Understand yet?

http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=64594.msg1726202#msg1726202
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

Luke 22:35-38

  • 3736
  • +9/-8
  • The earth is a globe, DUH! prove its not
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1111 on: December 16, 2015, 08:32:31 PM »
Don't mind me, I'm just subscribing. Carry on.
Scripture, facts, science, stats, and logic is how I argue.

Trans rights are human rights.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • +0/-0
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1112 on: December 16, 2015, 09:10:47 PM »
Rab Downunder: I have no idea why you are still banging on about choked flow; strawman much?

Even if a convergent/divergent nozzle could prevent the vacuum entering the combustion chamber (which, when we look at the laughable design of NASA's 'shpayze-rokkit' engines such as the F2, is doubtful) it will not prevent free expansion occurring after the throat.

So no work will be done by the gas at any point in the system.

Because a vacuum is Nothing, and you can't get Something out of Nothing.

As for this:

papa legba comments that the gases in the combustion could never be ignited, well:
(1) In the ascending rocket they are already ignited, so no problem unless the "fire goes out".
(2) On the ground, or under low pressure conditions ignition can be produced by starting with a hypergolic fuel and changing over to the primary fuel after ignition, as on the F-1 engine.
The law of conservation of momentum could have told you all this right from the start - of course it was used to derive the equations.

Non-sequitur much?

You really are a one-trick troll, aren't you?

Does that other Australian youtube super-space-shill Kris De Valle help you with your homework?
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45150
  • +95/-136
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1113 on: December 16, 2015, 10:22:53 PM »
Even if a convergent/divergent nozzle could prevent the vacuum entering the combustion chamber...
LOL!!  How does nothing (a vacuum) enter something (a combustion)?

... (which, when we look at the laughable design of NASA's 'shpayze-rokkit' engines such as the F2, is doubtful) it will not prevent free expansion occurring after the throat.
First of all, there is no F2 rocket engine.  You're either thinking F-1, which was not designed to operate in a vacuum, or (more likely) J-2, which was designed to operate in a vacuum.

Secondly, even after passing the throat, the expansion of the combustion gasses is still constrained by the bell section.  The gasses are truly free to expand only after they pass the lip of the engine bell.

So no work will be done by the gas at any point in the system.
So how does the gas accelerate from zero to speed of free expansion if no work is done?

Because a vacuum is Nothing, and you can't get Something out of Nothing.
But apparently you can get nothing to go into something.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • +0/-0
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1114 on: December 16, 2015, 10:39:49 PM »
LOL!!  How does nothing (a vacuum) enter something (a combustion)?

LOL!!! How do you get a gas to combust in a vacuum?

So how does the gas accelerate from zero to speed of free expansion if no work is done?

Through converting its pressure potential energy into molecular kinetic energy; thus, no 'force' is applied to the gas & no work is done, as the gas is expanding freely into a vacuum without meeting resistance.

But apparently you can get nothing to go into something.

This doesn't mean anything; typical markjo.

As for your silly J2 engine; by all means let us examine its 'combustion chamber', nozzle, etc...

It is a joke.

Just like your entire shitpost.

Also, I notice rab downunder is still avoiding addressing this blatant troll-post:

Object A is the Rocket + unburnt fuel, Object F is the burning fuel, and Object B is the thousands of pounds of fuel being ejected out the back.

Note that he is trying to tell us that Objects F & B are the exact same thing.

Here's a hint for you, rab: One, Two, Three.

Remember that!

Not One, Two, Two...

But One, Two, Three.

I believe there is a puppet vampire called Count Von Count on Sesame Street who may be able to help you further should you require it?
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • +0/-0
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1115 on: December 16, 2015, 10:44:18 PM »
LOL!!  How does nothing (a vacuum) enter something (a combustion)?

LOL!!! How do you get a gas to combust in a vacuum?

So how does the gas accelerate from zero to speed of free expansion if no work is done?

Through converting its pressure potential energy into molecular kinetic energy; thus, no 'force' is applied to the gas & no work is done, as the gas is expanding freely into a vacuum without meeting resistance.

But apparently you can get nothing to go into something.

This doesn't mean anything; typical markjo.

As for your silly J2 engine; by all means let us examine its 'combustion chamber', nozzle, etc...

It is a joke.

Just like your entire shitpost.

Also, I notice rab downunder is still avoiding addressing this blatant troll-post:

Object A is the Rocket + unburnt fuel, Object F is the burning fuel, and Object B is the thousands of pounds of fuel being ejected out the back.

Note that he is trying to tell us that Objects F & B are the exact same thing.

Here's a hint for you, rab: One, Two, Three.

Remember that!

Not One, Two, Two...

But One, Two, Three.

I believe there is a puppet vampire called Count Von Count on Sesame Street who may be able to help you further should you require it?

Lastly, note that sokarul is avoiding addressing this important point:

No. Why does it need to expand?

Because you said this:

The ball is the fuel/oxidizer exhaust.

Whilst markjo said this:

the expanding (burning) propellant is ONE object using stored energy to create a force by expanding against a SECOND object, i.e. the combustion chamber.

So, if the ball is NOT expanding, then your whole analogy FAILS.

Running away from the ludicrous contradictions at the heart of your arguments is quite the habit with you shpayze-trolls isn't it?
« Last Edit: December 16, 2015, 10:51:19 PM by Papa Legba »
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1116 on: December 16, 2015, 11:01:59 PM »
The Earth is a banana-shaped bottle-muffin, and light is an illusion. NASA doesn't even exist either, it's a pseudo-agency created by the Mayans back in the 25th century (time is also a lie!!) to convince people that Africa has a big desert. It's so stupid - of course there is no desert in Africa, cause if there was, all the millions of pictures and videos you see of it wouldn't be hilariously bad CGI. And all you people who says that you've been to Africa are LIARS!! BIG FAT LIARS, WORKING FOR CIA AND CHICK-FIL-A!! EXPOSE YOURSELVES, OR I WILL DO IT!!

It's all so obvious!! How else do you explain temperatures below 0 degrees celcius? - It proves it beyond doubt! No need for further debate.

If you don't believe me, call Stephen Hawkings, you idiots!!

" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

*

MaNaeSWolf

  • 2623
  • +1/-3
  • Show me the evidence
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1117 on: December 16, 2015, 11:23:48 PM »
Thanks. I am convinced now that Africa is not real. I will phone my Goverment and insist that they rename South Africa to just South
If you move fast enough, everything appears flat

?

luckyfred

  • 524
  • +0/-0
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1118 on: December 17, 2015, 12:11:54 AM »


Through converting its pressure potential energy into molecular kinetic energy; thus, no 'force' is applied to the gas & no work is done, as the gas is expanding freely into a vacuum without meeting resistance.
Pressure potential Energy in bernoulli's equation is the term relative to static pressure... Static means no movement. How  are u supposed to convert something that is static into kinetical Energy, which implies speed, without accelerating a mass of fluid?
But in general How do u suppose to convert Energy without forces and wok be exchanged?

U can convert easily gravitational potential energy into kinetical energy but that occurs thanks to the force of gravity

*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • +0/-0
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1119 on: December 17, 2015, 12:28:07 AM »
Object A is the Rocket + unburnt fuel, Object F is the burning fuel, and Object B is the thousands of pounds of fuel being ejected out the back.
Note that he is trying to tell us that Objects F & B are the exact same thing.
Here's a hint for you, rab: One, Two, Three.
Remember that!
Not One, Two, Two...
But One, Two, Three.

And you have not even hinted at your explanation of what choked flow in a de Laval really means.  If you study up a bit, you will find that when the flow is choked the downstream pressure has no effect on the flow through the nozzle.

Also please tell me just why the burning fuel in the combustion chamber cannot be classed as a "separated object" from the exhaust gasses ejected from the nozzle.  They are separated by the throat of the nozzle, and that is a very important distinction that you simply do not appreciate!  You do really need to study Rocketry 101.
Some answers from YOU now please, I have given you plenty.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1120 on: December 17, 2015, 01:13:46 AM »


Through converting its pressure potential energy into molecular kinetic energy; thus, no 'force' is applied to the gas & no work is done, as the gas is expanding freely into a vacuum without meeting resistance.
Pressure potential Energy in bernoulli's equation is the term relative to static pressure... Static means no movement. How  are u supposed to convert something that is static into kinetical Energy, which implies speed, without accelerating a mass of fluid?
But in general How do u suppose to convert Energy without forces and wok be exchanged?

U can convert easily gravitational potential energy into kinetical energy but that occurs thanks to the force of gravity
To create potential energy to be of use kinetically, you first have to expend the energy to do so, for it to actually be potential energy in the first place.

For instance: your rocket fuel in its container has to be pressurised, meaning it has to be forced into the container using a lot of energy.
Once that container valve is closed, that fuel now becomes potential energy until that valve is re-opened and the contents expelled for combustion or simply pressure against a medium/resistance.

Fuel being ejected out of a open chamber into a nozzle is going one way and one way only, which is out of the point of least resistance which is naturally the open end of the rocket.
On its way out the fuel causes friction against the side walls off whatever it flows through, whether that be a pipe or a chamber or a nozzle. However, this is where the con comes in with bogus rocket science, because we are meant to believe that this friction actually acts in reverse to the fuel being expelled.

Take a look at any rocket diagram and they show you the arrows pointing in reverse to the fuel being expelled. It's nonsense if people take the time to actually think about it.
It's like saying that grating cheese down a cheese grater will throw the cheese grater on the opposite direction to which the cheese is being pushed.
What's really happening is the cheese grater is on a worktop resisting the downward push of the cheese.
Anyone see what I'm saying?
Think of the fuel coming out of the rocket and hitting the sides of that rocket chamber/nozzle/pipes as it flows. It needs something to act as the worktop to stop the fuel and place a force back onto the rocket.
In space you do not have anything like that because it's like taking away the worktop and so, you cannot grate the cheese, which means you gain no work done at all.

This is why the rocket in space, recoil is ridiculous because recoil can only work against a resistance to energy and is why firing a gun creates it, in atmosphere.
In space you create nothing in a near vacuum as we are told and you only have to see what creating a very low pressure does to expand matter to know that your rockets in space are pure fantasy in how we are told they perform and what they actually are.

Like that video that So-carol keeps putting up. She uses it far too often to prove a point and it only proves a point to those who refuse to see what's really going on. The skateboard and medicine ball video I'm talking about.

People get told that the medicine ball is not pushing against atmosphere and it's simply the mass of the ball that propels the person in the opposite direction.
Think about the density of a medicine ball and how much atmosphere that ball actually displaces compared to a football.
What does a football have in it in abundance that the medicine ball does not have?
Answer: it obviously has a lot of atmosphere inside of it, meaning most of that ball in reality being pushed against the atmosphere would be of weak density/mass in displacing the atmosphere, because most of it is actually atmosphere.
The medicine ball holds some atmosphere in PORES of the structure but is mostly made up of repelling matter against the atmosphere, meaning it can displace one hell of a lot more.

What does this mean?
It means that there is a lot more atmospheric pressure upon that medicine ball and that medicine ball in the hands of a person has to resist that atmospheric push on it.
Think about the atmospheric push as a squeeze.
Think of it like someone grabbing you around your body and now you have to strain to release that grip to throw the person off you. You get pushed back because you are pushing into the same resistance for that ball.

The football creates little resistance against your body because it's already nearly equalised with the environment due to it being filled with atmosphere anyway.

People refuse to see how this works. They simply underestimate atmospheric pressure upon dense objects and the resistance it creates.
An easier way to view it is to show the area. Imagine that same medicine ball ironed out flat and stiff.
There's a lot of density/mass in it and so it will stretch out a good bit with a certain thickness.
For sake of argument let's go low sized and say that it flattens out 2 feet square and one inch thick.
Let's do the same with the football.
We can see that the football would be about 5 mm thick.

Which of the two will bend the most if you ran forward whilst holding them like a shield?
The answer is, the football would basically be bent around your arm due to the RESISTANCE of the atmosphere you pushed it against and you would feel a slight resistance to your running.

With your medicine ball sheet you will see that it will warp but  it would create a much much bigger resistance to your run, meaning you use a lot more energy trying to push into the atmosphere with it.

I hope people can now see that atmospheric pressure has everything to do with these tests and these tests are designed to simply dupe you in a clever way because to the untrained eye or thought, it can appear that magical gravity and such like is the reason.

Nothing in your life works unless there is a pressure/resistant reaction to any action, meaning that your very existence and every step you take is reliant on pushing against the atmosphere, which includes rockets and their fuel, whether it's a water rocket or a fuel fire rocket.

For every action there is and has to be an equal and opposite reaction, which applies to atmosphere for which any mass applies energy against.
There can not be any reaction to an action if there is no resistance to it, which means that space as we are told, is fictional, which means that everything in this space is fictional, which means (as we are dealing with them) space rockets are simply fictional.
« Last Edit: December 17, 2015, 01:15:19 AM by sceptimatic »

?

luckyfred

  • 524
  • +0/-0
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1121 on: December 17, 2015, 01:34:43 AM »
so shouldn't be that difficult to provide equations that show the thrust decreases as the atmospheric pressure decreases....
u keep talking about physics' pricinple but i'm still waiting for mathematical back up to your claims.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1122 on: December 17, 2015, 01:40:40 AM »
so shouldn't be that difficult to provide equations that show the thrust decreases as the atmospheric pressure decreases....
u keep talking about physics' pricinple but i'm still waiting for mathematical back up to your claims.
You don't need nonsensical equations to know that atmospheric pressure is required in order to make things work.
You don't need equations to observe that old Mrs Goggins is shouting for help through her window even though people tell you she's singing.

?

luckyfred

  • 524
  • +0/-0
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1123 on: December 17, 2015, 01:53:54 AM »
language of physics is math.
if u're talking about physics u must provide mathematical backup to your claims
if u state that rocket's physics work that way shouldn't be too hard to develop a mathematical model that is able to predict how thrust decreases with atmospheric pressure

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • +0/-0
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1124 on: December 17, 2015, 01:58:04 AM »
Also please tell me just why the burning fuel in the combustion chamber cannot be classed as a "separated object" from the exhaust gasses ejected from the nozzle.

I can't believe you just wrote that...

ARE you Kris De Valle?

The purpose of a convergent/divergent nozzle is to accelerate the gases, NOT to make them do work in a vacuum.

NOTHING can make them do that, because it is Impossible.

Some answers from YOU now please, I have given you plenty.

You have given me nothing but nonsense & flim-flam, so stop acting like the Thought-Gestapo & learn to count to Three...

One, Two, Three. Okay?

The fact is, anyone who paid attention during high-school physics should be capable of understanding that a rocket cannot function in a vacuum.

The main reason people cannot is because of paid trolls & idiots like you shouting them down & shitting the issue up...

So, with that in mind; Carry On Lying!

language of physics is math.

Language of luckyfred/tomfi is Gibberish.

Now get back in your kennel, space-poodle, before we have to call Cesar Milan to sort you out...
« Last Edit: December 17, 2015, 02:04:24 AM by Papa Legba »
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

?

luckyfred

  • 524
  • +0/-0
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1125 on: December 17, 2015, 02:06:35 AM »

The purpose of a convergent/divergent nozzle is to accelerate the gases, NOT to make them do work in a vacuum.

The fact is, anyone who paid attention during high-school physics should be capable of understanding that a rocket cannot function in a vacuum.
so if u accelerate gas a force should act on them, shouldn't it? if a force is acting on the gasses and they are only interacting with the nozzle an equal and opposite force should act on the nozzle, shouldn't it?


?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • +0/-0
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1126 on: December 17, 2015, 02:09:58 AM »
so if u accelerate gas a force should act on them, shouldn't it?

'Accelerate a gas' - LOL!!!

Pure Gibberish from our pet Gibber-poodle.
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • +0/-0
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1127 on: December 17, 2015, 02:15:08 AM »
so shouldn't be that difficult to provide equations that show the thrust decreases as the atmospheric pressure decreases....
u keep talking about physics' pricinple but i'm still waiting for mathematical back up to your claims.
You don't need nonsensical equations to know that atmospheric pressure is required in order to make things work.
You don't need equations to observe that old Mrs Goggins is shouting for help through her window even though people tell you she's singing.
But,  you would need equations to work just high your,  non-vacuum  rocket could fly.  It cannot be denied that rockets have climbed to extremely high altitudes.

?

luckyfred

  • 524
  • +0/-0
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1128 on: December 17, 2015, 02:18:29 AM »
so.. in order to accelerate a mass of gas u need or do not need a force?
« Last Edit: December 17, 2015, 02:29:35 AM by luckyfred »

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • +0/-0
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1129 on: December 17, 2015, 02:23:05 AM »
But,  you would need equations to work just high your,  non-vacuum  rocket could fly.

And the Gibberish continues...

You HAVE been takings lessons, haven't you?

Maybe you & luckypoodle/tomfi should take a lesson from the following instead?

So how does the gas accelerate from zero to speed of free expansion if no work is done?

Through converting its pressure potential energy into molecular kinetic energy; thus, no 'force' is applied to the gas & no work is done, as the gas is expanding freely into a vacuum without meeting resistance.

What a pair of clowns...

Remember, rab downunder: One, Two, THREE.

I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • +0/-0
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1130 on: December 17, 2015, 02:32:39 AM »
Also please tell me just why the burning fuel in the combustion chamber cannot be classed as a "separated object" from the exhaust gasses ejected from the nozzle.

I can't believe you just wrote that...

ARE you Kris De Valle?

The purpose of a convergent/divergent nozzle is to accelerate the gases, NOT to make them do work in a vacuum.

NOTHING can make them do that, because it is Impossible.

Some answers from YOU now please, I have given you plenty.

You have given me nothing but nonsense & flim-flam, so stop acting like the Thought-Gestapo & learn to count to Three...

One, Two, Three. Okay?

The fact is, anyone who paid attention during high-school physics should be capable of understanding that a rocket cannot function in a vacuum.

The main reason people cannot is because of paid trolls & idiots like you shouting them down & shitting the issue up...

So, with that in mind; Carry On Lying!

language of physics is math.

Language of luckyfred/tomfi is Gibberish.

Now get back in your kennel, space-poodle, before we have to call Cesar Milan to sort you out...
Rockets do operate quite successfully to quite high altitudes.  But Papa legba with all his great expertise cannot tell anyone just how high they can go! . 
The V2 was claimed to be able to reach over 260 miles when fired vertically.  Is that TOO high?

You have simply proved yourself completely unable to answer one simple question!
All you can do is insult anyone that dares disagrees with your ideas.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • +0/-0
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1131 on: December 17, 2015, 02:36:24 AM »
All you can do is insult anyone that dares disagrees with your ideas.

Actually, I was mocking you because you cannot count to three.

Look:

Object A is the Rocket + unburnt fuel, Object F is the burning fuel, and Object B is the thousands of pounds of fuel being ejected out the back.

See what you did?

One, Two, Two...

LOL!!!
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

?

luckyfred

  • 524
  • +0/-0
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1132 on: December 17, 2015, 02:42:13 AM »
Through converting its pressure potential energy into molecular kinetic energy; thus, no 'force' is applied to the gas & no work is done, as the gas is expanding freely into a vacuum without meeting resistance.

so are you able to accelerate a mass without applying a force? have your welder buddies taught you this or have u leanrt this in highschool?

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1133 on: December 17, 2015, 02:54:40 AM »
Through converting its pressure potential energy into molecular kinetic energy; thus, no 'force' is applied to the gas & no work is done, as the gas is expanding freely into a vacuum without meeting resistance.

so are you able to accelerate a mass without applying a force? have your welder buddies taught you this or have u leanrt this in highschool?
How about actually reading what he's said. Surely you're capable of understanding what he's said.

*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • +0/-0
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1134 on: December 17, 2015, 03:04:04 AM »
All you can do is insult anyone that dares disagrees with your ideas.

Actually, I was mocking you because you cannot count to three.

Look:

Object A is the Rocket + unburnt fuel, Object F is the burning fuel, and Object B is the thousands of pounds of fuel being ejected out the back.
Still incapable of any answers!

See what you did?

One, Two, Two...

LOL!!!

?

luckyfred

  • 524
  • +0/-0
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1135 on: December 17, 2015, 03:06:16 AM »
Through converting its pressure potential energy into molecular kinetic energy; thus, no 'force' is applied to the gas & no work is done, as the gas is expanding freely into a vacuum without meeting resistance.

so are you able to accelerate a mass without applying a force? have your welder buddies taught you this or have u leanrt this in highschool?
How about actually reading what he's said. Surely you're capable of understanding what he's said.

he's talking about converting potential energy into kinetical without applying a force... i'd like to know how is possibile

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • +0/-0
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1136 on: December 17, 2015, 03:11:38 AM »
i'd like to know how is possibile

And I'd like to know what the word 'possibile' means...

Btw, nice double-shitpost from you & rabinoz to turn the page & get top spot on this one.

Good Clown-work from the raown derf slapstick posse!
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

?

luckyfred

  • 524
  • +0/-0
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1137 on: December 17, 2015, 03:13:02 AM »
how is possible to turn potential energy into kinetical energy without applying a force?

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • +0/-0
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1138 on: December 17, 2015, 03:17:28 AM »
Already answered, circus-poodle; the fact that you left the word 'pressure' out of my description shows you know that, too.

What a Troll-hound!

Anyhoo; let's return to the post full of awkward questions that you just tried to shitpost down the memory-hole, Clown Derfers:

LOL!!  How does nothing (a vacuum) enter something (a combustion)?

LOL!!! How do you get a gas to combust in a vacuum?

So how does the gas accelerate from zero to speed of free expansion if no work is done?

Through converting its pressure potential energy into molecular kinetic energy; thus, no 'force' is applied to the gas & no work is done, as the gas is expanding freely into a vacuum without meeting resistance.

But apparently you can get nothing to go into something.

This doesn't mean anything; typical markjo.

As for your silly J2 engine; by all means let us examine its 'combustion chamber', nozzle, etc...

It is a joke.

Just like your entire shitpost.

Also, I notice rab downunder is still avoiding addressing this blatant troll-post:

Object A is the Rocket + unburnt fuel, Object F is the burning fuel, and Object B is the thousands of pounds of fuel being ejected out the back.

Note that he is trying to tell us that Objects F & B are the exact same thing.

Here's a hint for you, rab: One, Two, Three.

Remember that!

Not One, Two, Two...

But One, Two, Three.

I believe there is a puppet vampire called Count Von Count on Sesame Street who may be able to help you further should you require it?

Lastly, note that sokarul is avoiding addressing this important point:

No. Why does it need to expand?

Because you said this:

The ball is the fuel/oxidizer exhaust.

Whilst markjo said this:

the expanding (burning) propellant is ONE object using stored energy to create a force by expanding against a SECOND object, i.e. the combustion chamber.

So, if the ball is NOT expanding, then your whole analogy FAILS.

Running away from the ludicrous contradictions at the heart of your arguments is quite the habit with you shpayze-trolls isn't it?


*Yawn!*
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

?

luckyfred

  • 524
  • +0/-0
Re: People on skateboards.
« Reply #1139 on: December 17, 2015, 03:24:02 AM »
Already answered, circus-poodle; the fact that you left the word 'pressure' out of my description shows you know that, too.

What a Troll-hound!

ok... if u're trasforming pressure potential energy into kinetical energy u are applying bernoulli's equation, aren't u?