People on skateboards.

Quote from: sceptimatic on December 08, 2015, 05:34:56 AM

Quote from: luckyfred on December 08, 2015, 05:32:20 AM

Is got to do with inertia..even though maybe the egg would be too viscous to show the effect. With a ball full of water it should works fine

I agree and it still stands. What has this to do with space?

To show u that u don't need what u call leverage to exert a force, inertia still permits to have a force without a leverage.

How will the egg start spinning again if a force is not exerted between the egg and the liquid inside it?

Let's use a bowl half full of water on a turntable, turning fairly fast.
Because the bowl is a solid and the water is a liquid, the bowl will spin faster than the water. Basically the bowl will create a friction between it and the water.

Once you stop that turntable, you still have a catch up of spinning water which would start to wobble the bowl as the bowls side acts as a brake to stop it.
In the egg you have two things happening but I think it will get lost on you by me describing it, because you have no intention of wanting to grasp it.
You're too focused on the nah nah nee nah nah attitude like most of you people are.

Maybe the egg experiment was too hard to understand?

We can go even simpler because, physics!

Find a chair with wheels, place the chair on a floor with low friction and place your ass on the seat. Grab something heavy and throw it away from you, tell me what happens 

Quote from: Master_Evar on December 08, 2015, 05:38:59 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on December 08, 2015, 05:35:46 AM

Quote from: Master_Evar on December 08, 2015, 05:32:47 AM

@sceptimatic, you are not running away now, right? I am not even finished with my explanation yet.

Start explaining properly and I'll gladly go with it.

I am explaining properly. Now, we have a piston like I described, and we can increase the length of the piston rod as it extends. As it extends, the main part/housing will go one way, and the piston rod will go the opposite way, right?

It would appear that way but in reality only the piston would go one way whilst the housing and motors stayed still.

Now you have to explain yourself. The piston rod is pushed by the motors, and the motors in turn get's pushed by the piston rod. So they should, and will, go different ways. Can you please provide information why the piston rod is different from the housing in such a way that it will not get pushed?

Maybe the egg experiment was too hard to understand?

We can go even simpler because, physics!

Find a chair with wheels, place the chair on a floor with low friction and place your ass on the seat. Grab something heavy and throw it away from you, tell me what happens 

We'll leave it at that with you. A total waste of time carrying on anything with you. Go and pat your internet mates arses and bull each other up.

Quote from: sircool on December 08, 2015, 05:52:21 AM

Maybe the egg experiment was too hard to understand?

We can go even simpler because, physics!

Find a chair with wheels, place the chair on a floor with low friction and place your ass on the seat. Grab something heavy and throw it away from you, tell me what happens 

We'll leave it at that with you. A total waste of time carrying on anything with you. Go and pat your internet mates arses and bull each other up.

you can run all you want but one day, physics will come and smack you in the nuts!

Quote from: sceptimatic on December 08, 2015, 05:41:26 AM

Quote from: Master_Evar on December 08, 2015, 05:38:59 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on December 08, 2015, 05:35:46 AM

Quote from: Master_Evar on December 08, 2015, 05:32:47 AM

@sceptimatic, you are not running away now, right? I am not even finished with my explanation yet.

Start explaining properly and I'll gladly go with it.

I am explaining properly. Now, we have a piston like I described, and we can increase the length of the piston rod as it extends. As it extends, the main part/housing will go one way, and the piston rod will go the opposite way, right?

It would appear that way but in reality only the piston would go one way whilst the housing and motors stayed still.

Now you have to explain yourself. The piston rod is pushed by the motors, and the motors in turn get's pushed by the piston rod. So they should, and will, go different ways. Can you please provide information why the piston rod is different from the housing in such a way that it will not get pushed?

The motors have to be attached to the housing in order to push the piston rod, right?
Just like a conveyor belt. the motor turns the wheels that the rubber belt sits on and those wheels push that belt along.
The wheels turn one way and push the belt the other way but you only see  the belt moving in one direction, not the motor housing and frame moving the other.

If you were to hang these in the air and look at them, then it would appears that both were going in opposite directions.
Like a moving car against a stationary car. It's hard to tell which one is moving when looked at side by side.
You could guess that both were moving in   opposite directions if you weren't inside one with the handbrake on.

See what I'm saying?

Quote from: sceptimatic on December 08, 2015, 05:54:52 AM

Quote from: sircool on December 08, 2015, 05:52:21 AM

Maybe the egg experiment was too hard to understand?

We can go even simpler because, physics!

Find a chair with wheels, place the chair on a floor with low friction and place your ass on the seat. Grab something heavy and throw it away from you, tell me what happens 

We'll leave it at that with you. A total waste of time carrying on anything with you. Go and pat your internet mates arses and bull each other up.

you can run all you want but one day, physics will come and smack you in the nuts!

Hopefully reality will smack you in the face. I doubt it but there's always hope that naive people like you, sometimes, can see the light.

You people need to be alone in a room where you can't look for back up and feel comfort among your like minded peers. I believe most of you would start to understand logical reality if this happened.

Quote from: Master_Evar on December 08, 2015, 05:54:16 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on December 08, 2015, 05:41:26 AM

Quote from: Master_Evar on December 08, 2015, 05:38:59 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on December 08, 2015, 05:35:46 AM

Quote from: Master_Evar on December 08, 2015, 05:32:47 AM

@sceptimatic, you are not running away now, right? I am not even finished with my explanation yet.

Start explaining properly and I'll gladly go with it.

I am explaining properly. Now, we have a piston like I described, and we can increase the length of the piston rod as it extends. As it extends, the main part/housing will go one way, and the piston rod will go the opposite way, right?

It would appear that way but in reality only the piston would go one way whilst the housing and motors stayed still.

Now you have to explain yourself. The piston rod is pushed by the motors, and the motors in turn get's pushed by the piston rod. So they should, and will, go different ways. Can you please provide information why the piston rod is different from the housing in such a way that it will not get pushed?

The motors have to be attached to the housing in order to push the piston rod, right?
Just like a conveyor belt. the motor turns the wheels that the rubber belt sits on and those wheels push that belt along.
The wheels turn one way and push the belt the other way but you only see  the belt moving in one direction, not the motor housing and frame moving the other.

If you were to hang these in the air and look at them, then it would appears that both were going in opposite directions.
Like a moving car against a stationary car. It's hard to tell which one is moving when looked at side by side.
You could guess that both were moving in   opposite directions if you weren't inside one with the handbrake on.

See what I'm saying?

MAYBE conveyors are bolted onto something which is bolted onto the ground? Nah, that'd be truly MADNESS wouldn't it? 

Also, that car analogy doesn't make sense. If moving car is is going against a stationary car, then either both cars will start moving in the same direction or both will stand still. Either both move, or neither move. That is not how it works in my analogy anyways.

Quote from: sceptimatic on December 08, 2015, 06:01:17 AM

Quote from: Master_Evar on December 08, 2015, 05:54:16 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on December 08, 2015, 05:41:26 AM

Quote from: Master_Evar on December 08, 2015, 05:38:59 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on December 08, 2015, 05:35:46 AM

Quote from: Master_Evar on December 08, 2015, 05:32:47 AM

@sceptimatic, you are not running away now, right? I am not even finished with my explanation yet.

Start explaining properly and I'll gladly go with it.

I am explaining properly. Now, we have a piston like I described, and we can increase the length of the piston rod as it extends. As it extends, the main part/housing will go one way, and the piston rod will go the opposite way, right?

It would appear that way but in reality only the piston would go one way whilst the housing and motors stayed still.

Now you have to explain yourself. The piston rod is pushed by the motors, and the motors in turn get's pushed by the piston rod. So they should, and will, go different ways. Can you please provide information why the piston rod is different from the housing in such a way that it will not get pushed?

The motors have to be attached to the housing in order to push the piston rod, right?
Just like a conveyor belt. the motor turns the wheels that the rubber belt sits on and those wheels push that belt along.
The wheels turn one way and push the belt the other way but you only see  the belt moving in one direction, not the motor housing and frame moving the other.

If you were to hang these in the air and look at them, then it would appears that both were going in opposite directions.
Like a moving car against a stationary car. It's hard to tell which one is moving when looked at side by side.
You could guess that both were moving in   opposite directions if you weren't inside one with the handbrake on.

See what I'm saying?

MAYBE conveyors are bolted onto something which is bolted onto the ground? Nah, that'd be truly MADNESS wouldn't it? 

Also, that car analogy doesn't make sense. If moving car is is going against a stationary car, then either both cars will start moving in the same direction or both will stand still. Either both move, or neither move. That is not how it works in my analogy anyways.

This is where we need to stop. Good luck with whatever you want to do and decide. I''ll stick with my thoughts.
No need to carry this on, seriously.

Quote from: Master_Evar on December 08, 2015, 06:10:45 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on December 08, 2015, 06:01:17 AM

Quote from: Master_Evar on December 08, 2015, 05:54:16 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on December 08, 2015, 05:41:26 AM

Quote from: Master_Evar on December 08, 2015, 05:38:59 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on December 08, 2015, 05:35:46 AM

Quote from: Master_Evar on December 08, 2015, 05:32:47 AM

@sceptimatic, you are not running away now, right? I am not even finished with my explanation yet.

Start explaining properly and I'll gladly go with it.

I am explaining properly. Now, we have a piston like I described, and we can increase the length of the piston rod as it extends. As it extends, the main part/housing will go one way, and the piston rod will go the opposite way, right?

It would appear that way but in reality only the piston would go one way whilst the housing and motors stayed still.

Now you have to explain yourself. The piston rod is pushed by the motors, and the motors in turn get's pushed by the piston rod. So they should, and will, go different ways. Can you please provide information why the piston rod is different from the housing in such a way that it will not get pushed?

The motors have to be attached to the housing in order to push the piston rod, right?
Just like a conveyor belt. the motor turns the wheels that the rubber belt sits on and those wheels push that belt along.
The wheels turn one way and push the belt the other way but you only see  the belt moving in one direction, not the motor housing and frame moving the other.

If you were to hang these in the air and look at them, then it would appears that both were going in opposite directions.
Like a moving car against a stationary car. It's hard to tell which one is moving when looked at side by side.
You could guess that both were moving in   opposite directions if you weren't inside one with the handbrake on.

See what I'm saying?

MAYBE conveyors are bolted onto something which is bolted onto the ground? Nah, that'd be truly MADNESS wouldn't it? 

Also, that car analogy doesn't make sense. If moving car is is going against a stationary car, then either both cars will start moving in the same direction or both will stand still. Either both move, or neither move. That is not how it works in my analogy anyways.

This is where we need to stop. Good luck with whatever you want to do and decide. I''ll stick with my thoughts.
No need to carry this on, seriously.

Ahh, so you failed to disprove my not yet finished analogy and now you are running away. How typical. So, I guess you don't want to learn how rockets actually work then:

Quote from: sircool on December 08, 2015, 05:58:05 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on December 08, 2015, 05:54:52 AM

Quote from: sircool on December 08, 2015, 05:52:21 AM

Maybe the egg experiment was too hard to understand?

We can go even simpler because, physics!

Find a chair with wheels, place the chair on a floor with low friction and place your ass on the seat. Grab something heavy and throw it away from you, tell me what happens 

We'll leave it at that with you. A total waste of time carrying on anything with you. Go and pat your internet mates arses and bull each other up.

you can run all you want but one day, physics will come and smack you in the nuts!

Hopefully reality will smack you in the face. I doubt it but there's always hope that naive people like you, sometimes, can see the light.

You people need to be alone in a room where you can't look for back up and feel comfort among your like minded peers. I believe most of you would start to understand logical reality if this happened.

What?

Let's deal with this nonsense.

As tehEnjynnre is clearly sokarul v2.0 I will do it as simply as possible & in the appropriate manner:

I solved the problem on the first page. 

Incorrect.

As for the rest of you; nobody cares.

Anyone who argues for the creation of something from nothing is too retarded to bother taking seriously.

Quote from: luckyfred on December 08, 2015, 05:43:18 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on December 08, 2015, 05:34:56 AM

Quote from: luckyfred on December 08, 2015, 05:32:20 AM

Is got to do with inertia..even though maybe the egg would be too viscous to show the effect. With a ball full of water it should works fine

I agree and it still stands. What has this to do with space?

To show u that u don't need what u call leverage to exert a force, inertia still permits to have a force without a leverage.

How will the egg start spinning again if a force is not exerted between the egg and the liquid inside it?

Let's use a bowl half full of water on a turntable, turning fairly fast.
Because the bowl is a solid and the water is a liquid, the bowl will spin faster than the water. Basically the bowl will create a friction between it and the water.

Once you stop that turntable, you still have a catch up of spinning water which would start to wobble the bowl as the bowls side acts as a brake to stop it.
In the egg you have two things happening but I think it will get lost on you by me describing it, because you have no intention of wanting to grasp it.
You're too focused on the nah nah nee nah nah attitude like most of you people are.

If u stop and the release the turntable it will start spinning again. That's because the water which is still spinning makes the bowl to spin and then the bowl makes the turn table to spin cause they are attached.

But to make the bowl spin u need a force... Only thing able to create that force is the spinning water... I see inertia and friction, no leverage but yet a force. How come?

I know I know I know!




















































































































































Inertia

Quote from: sceptimatic on December 08, 2015, 05:51:03 AM

Quote from: luckyfred on December 08, 2015, 05:43:18 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on December 08, 2015, 05:34:56 AM

Quote from: luckyfred on December 08, 2015, 05:32:20 AM

Is got to do with inertia..even though maybe the egg would be too viscous to show the effect. With a ball full of water it should works fine

I agree and it still stands. What has this to do with space?

To show u that u don't need what u call leverage to exert a force, inertia still permits to have a force without a leverage.

How will the egg start spinning again if a force is not exerted between the egg and the liquid inside it?

Let's use a bowl half full of water on a turntable, turning fairly fast.
Because the bowl is a solid and the water is a liquid, the bowl will spin faster than the water. Basically the bowl will create a friction between it and the water.

Once you stop that turntable, you still have a catch up of spinning water which would start to wobble the bowl as the bowls side acts as a brake to stop it.
In the egg you have two things happening but I think it will get lost on you by me describing it, because you have no intention of wanting to grasp it.
You're too focused on the nah nah nee nah nah attitude like most of you people are.

If u stop and the release the turntable it will start spinning again. That's because the water which is still spinning makes the bowl to spin and then the bowl makes the turn table to spin cause they are attached.

But to make the bowl spin u need a force... Only thing able to create that force is the spinning water... I see inertia and friction, no leverage but yet a force. How come?

Correct the turntable will spin. I just assumed you would grasp that when I mention the wobbling bowl.

You should also grasp centrifugal force in the right context of how it works. Clue: it has a lot to do with atmospheric pressures , low v high.

Quote from: luckyfred on December 08, 2015, 06:27:20 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on December 08, 2015, 05:51:03 AM

Quote from: luckyfred on December 08, 2015, 05:43:18 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on December 08, 2015, 05:34:56 AM

Quote from: luckyfred on December 08, 2015, 05:32:20 AM

Is got to do with inertia..even though maybe the egg would be too viscous to show the effect. With a ball full of water it should works fine

I agree and it still stands. What has this to do with space?

To show u that u don't need what u call leverage to exert a force, inertia still permits to have a force without a leverage.

How will the egg start spinning again if a force is not exerted between the egg and the liquid inside it?

Let's use a bowl half full of water on a turntable, turning fairly fast.
Because the bowl is a solid and the water is a liquid, the bowl will spin faster than the water. Basically the bowl will create a friction between it and the water.

Once you stop that turntable, you still have a catch up of spinning water which would start to wobble the bowl as the bowls side acts as a brake to stop it.
In the egg you have two things happening but I think it will get lost on you by me describing it, because you have no intention of wanting to grasp it.
You're too focused on the nah nah nee nah nah attitude like most of you people are.

If u stop and the release the turntable it will start spinning again. That's because the water which is still spinning makes the bowl to spin and then the bowl makes the turn table to spin cause they are attached.

But to make the bowl spin u need a force... Only thing able to create that force is the spinning water... I see inertia and friction, no leverage but yet a force. How come?

Correct the turntable will spin. I just assumed you would grasp that when I mention the wobbling bowl.

You should also grasp centrifugal force in the right context of how it works. Clue: it has a lot to do with atmospheric pressures , low v high.

there is no such thing as a centrifugal force, just thought I should let you know, also there's little atmosphere inside an egg!

Quote from: luckyfred on December 08, 2015, 06:27:20 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on December 08, 2015, 05:51:03 AM

Quote from: luckyfred on December 08, 2015, 05:43:18 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on December 08, 2015, 05:34:56 AM

Quote from: luckyfred on December 08, 2015, 05:32:20 AM

Is got to do with inertia..even though maybe the egg would be too viscous to show the effect. With a ball full of water it should works fine

I agree and it still stands. What has this to do with space?

To show u that u don't need what u call leverage to exert a force, inertia still permits to have a force without a leverage.

How will the egg start spinning again if a force is not exerted between the egg and the liquid inside it?

Let's use a bowl half full of water on a turntable, turning fairly fast.
Because the bowl is a solid and the water is a liquid, the bowl will spin faster than the water. Basically the bowl will create a friction between it and the water.

Once you stop that turntable, you still have a catch up of spinning water which would start to wobble the bowl as the bowls side acts as a brake to stop it.
In the egg you have two things happening but I think it will get lost on you by me describing it, because you have no intention of wanting to grasp it.
You're too focused on the nah nah nee nah nah attitude like most of you people are.

If u stop and the release the turntable it will start spinning again. That's because the water which is still spinning makes the bowl to spin and then the bowl makes the turn table to spin cause they are attached.

But to make the bowl spin u need a force... Only thing able to create that force is the spinning water... I see inertia and friction, no leverage but yet a force. How come?

Correct the turntable will spin. I just assumed you would grasp that when I mention the wobbling bowl.

You should also grasp centrifugal force in the right context of how it works. Clue: it has a lot to do with atmospheric pressures , low v high.

Atmospheric pressure? Yet again? Please stop putting it everywhere. It has nothing to do with the bowl and spinning water... That's just viscosity and inertia

Quote from: sceptimatic on December 08, 2015, 06:32:43 AM

Quote from: luckyfred on December 08, 2015, 06:27:20 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on December 08, 2015, 05:51:03 AM

Quote from: luckyfred on December 08, 2015, 05:43:18 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on December 08, 2015, 05:34:56 AM

Quote from: luckyfred on December 08, 2015, 05:32:20 AM

Is got to do with inertia..even though maybe the egg would be too viscous to show the effect. With a ball full of water it should works fine

I agree and it still stands. What has this to do with space?

To show u that u don't need what u call leverage to exert a force, inertia still permits to have a force without a leverage.

How will the egg start spinning again if a force is not exerted between the egg and the liquid inside it?

Let's use a bowl half full of water on a turntable, turning fairly fast.
Because the bowl is a solid and the water is a liquid, the bowl will spin faster than the water. Basically the bowl will create a friction between it and the water.

Once you stop that turntable, you still have a catch up of spinning water which would start to wobble the bowl as the bowls side acts as a brake to stop it.
In the egg you have two things happening but I think it will get lost on you by me describing it, because you have no intention of wanting to grasp it.
You're too focused on the nah nah nee nah nah attitude like most of you people are.

If u stop and the release the turntable it will start spinning again. That's because the water which is still spinning makes the bowl to spin and then the bowl makes the turn table to spin cause they are attached.

But to make the bowl spin u need a force... Only thing able to create that force is the spinning water... I see inertia and friction, no leverage but yet a force. How come?

Correct the turntable will spin. I just assumed you would grasp that when I mention the wobbling bowl.

You should also grasp centrifugal force in the right context of how it works. Clue: it has a lot to do with atmospheric pressures , low v high.

Atmospheric pressure? Yet again? Please stop putting it everywhere. It has nothing to do with the bowl and spinning water... That's just viscosity and inertia

It has everything to do with it. The issue is the fact that you and many other's are duped into thinking there's some magic happening with a force that cannot be explained.

Quote from: sircool on December 08, 2015, 04:48:22 AM

Either way guys, guns in space, atmospheric pressure... Inertia will solve this problem. If you fart in space, accelerate you will. Stop being such a bunch of Mormons.

Any chance of explaining how your inertia works?
Resistance to energy and movement isn't it?
Tell me about it.

No. Resistance to movement is called friction. 

Inertia is described by Newton's first law (an object at rest or in motion tends to stay at rest or in motion unless acted upon by another force). 

Hey Sceptimatic, you just lost by saying inertia is caused by atmospheric pressure....

It's not hard to say something smart, just think of something stupid and say the opposite! shouldn't be hard for you

Quote from: sceptimatic on December 08, 2015, 04:52:21 AM

Quote from: sircool on December 08, 2015, 04:48:22 AM

Either way guys, guns in space, atmospheric pressure... Inertia will solve this problem. If you fart in space, accelerate you will. Stop being such a bunch of Mormons.

Any chance of explaining how your inertia works?
Resistance to energy and movement isn't it?
Tell me about it.

No. Resistance to movement is called friction. 

Inertia is described by Newton's first law (an object at rest or in motion tends to stay at rest or in motion unless acted upon by another force).

So inertia is something at rest and that's that. Not really worth mentioning is it, unless it's actually acted upon, which means it resists the force to move by friction against its  mass.

Oh goodie. The 300 mph wind that propelled baseballs and golf balls....and anything else in motion is back. I missed it.

So inertia is something at rest and that's that.

That's part of it.  It's more like something keeps doing whatever it's doing unless another force tells it to do something different.

Not really worth mentioning is it, unless it's actually acted upon, which means it resists the force to move by friction against its  mass.

No.  Friction is a force, inertia is a property.  The force of friction must be overcome before an object's inertia can be affected.

Oh goodie. The 300 mph wind that propelled baseballs and golf balls....and anything else in motion is back. I missed it.

You can't knock reality. We all know what reality is and space nor magical forces have any bearing on how it pans out.

It actually shocks me that so many people on here refuse to grasp it because their ego's are too big and delicate to dare to take the time to understand it.

an object at rest or in motion tends to stay at rest or in motion unless acted upon by another force

LULZ!!!

Markjo 'difeets' himself yet again...

Total jack-assery from the raown derf slapstick posse!

Quote from: sokarul on December 08, 2015, 07:24:28 AM

Oh goodie. The 300 mph wind that propelled baseballs and golf balls....and anything else in motion is back. I missed it.

You can't knock reality. We all know what reality is and space nor magical forces have any bearing on how it pans out.

It actually shocks me that so many people on here refuse to grasp it because their ego's are too big and delicate to dare to take the time to understand it.

provide me some scientific papers that shows what u claim and i'll be happy to read and understand them.

otherwise u're just a random guy on the internet claim that all my studies and my everyday experiences are wrong, why should i trust u and distrust myself and some pretty knowledgable people

Quote from: sceptimatic on December 08, 2015, 07:29:45 AM

Quote from: sokarul on December 08, 2015, 07:24:28 AM

Oh goodie. The 300 mph wind that propelled baseballs and golf balls....and anything else in motion is back. I missed it.

You can't knock reality. We all know what reality is and space nor magical forces have any bearing on how it pans out.

It actually shocks me that so many people on here refuse to grasp it because their ego's are too big and delicate to dare to take the time to understand it.

provide me some scientific papers that shows what u claim and i'll be happy to read and understand them.

otherwise u're just a random guy on the internet claim that all my studies and my everyday experiences are wrong, why should i trust u and distrust myself and some pretty knowledgable people

I'm not the least bit interested whether you trust me or not. It's entirely up to you what you take from what is being said. All I ask people to do is to search their own minds and use logic and common sense to decide for themselves what is true or false or potentially viable against something that may not be realistic when actually given some thought to.

You carry on as you are and you don't need to type one more word to me, ever. Just talk among your internet like-minded friends and spend your days mocking people like me if it makes you feel intelligent or superior.
I don't think you're a dummy or anything.  I just believe you are ultra naive, unless what you're doing is deliberate and that's  why your hours on here are being wasted.

So I guess sceptimatic will not give in no matter what, as he ran away before I even finished my explanation.

Quote from: luckyfred on December 08, 2015, 07:56:23 AM

Quote from: sceptimatic on December 08, 2015, 07:29:45 AM

Quote from: sokarul on December 08, 2015, 07:24:28 AM

Oh goodie. The 300 mph wind that propelled baseballs and golf balls....and anything else in motion is back. I missed it.

You can't knock reality. We all know what reality is and space nor magical forces have any bearing on how it pans out.

It actually shocks me that so many people on here refuse to grasp it because their ego's are too big and delicate to dare to take the time to understand it.

provide me some scientific papers that shows what u claim and i'll be happy to read and understand them.

otherwise u're just a random guy on the internet claim that all my studies and my everyday experiences are wrong, why should i trust u and distrust myself and some pretty knowledgable people

I'm not the least bit interested whether you trust me or not. It's entirely up to you what you take from what is being said. All I ask people to do is to search their own minds and use logic and common sense to decide for themselves what is true or false or potentially viable against something that may not be realistic when actually given some thought to.

You carry on as you are and you don't need to type one more word to me, ever. Just talk among your internet like-minded friends and spend your days mocking people like me if it makes you feel intelligent or superior.
I don't think you're a dummy or anything.  I just believe you are ultra naive, unless what you're doing is deliberate and that's  why your hours on here are being wasted.

u don't have to use common sense, u need to use physics

Quote from: markjo on December 08, 2015, 06:58:47 AM

an object at rest or in motion tends to stay at rest or in motion unless acted upon by another force

LULZ!!!

Markjo 'difeets' himself yet again...

Total jack-assery from the raown derf slapstick posse!

If you want to add something productive to the discussion, then please do.  If you just want to shitpost abusive gibberish, then feel free to fuck off.