Coriolis and Einstein's theory of relativity contradict each other. Einstein proposed relative motion to account for why the Michelson-Morely experiment failed. This was a major experiment conducted to prove earths rotation. Einstein stated that no optical experiment can be conducted to detect earths movement. So everything you guys are saying contradicts relativity. The Linear Aircraft Model as defined by NASA operates under the "flat, non-rotating earth assumption" because of relative motion, so they claim. An explantion needs to be provided as to why those experiments to detect earths movement failed, yet there is somehow coriolis? It makes no sense.
The Michelson-Morley Experiment was dependent on the existence of an ether as the "material" on and from which everything is built and through which light propagates. The most obvious conclusion to draw from this is that that simply doesn't exist,
not that the Earth is not rotating. That's the explanation, and it's been clear as day since the experiment was first performed. Just because one method of determining something fails doesn't mean that the expected result isn't true. For example, I can have a drawer of socks and tell you that because the sock I'm going to draw is blue then the sky is blue, then draw a red sock; that doesn't mean the sky isn't blue. Likewise, just because there's no ether for Earth to move in relation to doesn't mean Earth isn't moving. So Einstein developed his theory of relativity as an alternate explanation of things based on actual mathematics instead of speculation and philosophy.
Now as for the Coriolis Effect, that's not simply an optical test. "Optical tests" are where you look at the sky and see if it's moving; the results are ambiguous, either the sky is moving under you or you are moving under the sky. The Coriolis Effect, however, clearly shows a difference in the motion of the atmosphere at different latitudes. As air move towards or away from the equator it will deflect. A globe Earth's angular momentum and the conservation of the air's momentum explains this perfectly. It has absolutely nothing to do with the physics of light, it's not based on relativity, it's basic mechanical physics, it's not an optical test, it's observation of momentum and location. Just because you have to look up doesn't mean it's in the same boat as the experiments Einstein said can't be used to prove Earth's rotation.