No, my point is that the maps would not be compatible.
1. One has edges, the other have none.
2. The lesser the edges, the greater the distortion.
You won't get close to an accurate map. For this I'm assuming edges as an distortion. You could make many edges to avoid distortions, but edges themselves are distortions as they create borders which did not exist, or elliminate borders that did exist:
You're still assuming one way of constructing a map: and for that matter assuming Antarctica as a set point. That example would remain drastically different to any proposed FE map.
Close around the Arctic. Tilt the Americas so SA is still pointed towards Africa, while NA moves nearer to Russia. That's a hasty example of a better, if not perfect, map.
Keeping the angles each landmass is poised at constant between each map is purposefully limiting options.
I am aware of edges as errors: I did specifically bring up that problem in my last post. Fill in the gaps between edges with sea and that may help well enough: you'll be left with lots of little distortions from a globe, certainly, but a) that's only relevant if you assume the Earth is a globe, and b) it won't matter on the typical scale journeys occur in.
This is without getting onto the possibility of the Earth being tilted through a higher dimension, which I've seen proposed.
No, I'm not assuming anything. And if you tilt the landmasses, it'll distort the sea bed horribly, and distances between land masses will also be distorted.
If you fill
gaps (you can't fill edges, but you can fill space between edges) with any water, you add something which doesn't exist. If you add space which does not exist it is no longer a map of the same place. You can stretch the sea bed out to fill some gaps, but that would, well, stretch them out. And my biggest problem with edges is the fact that on one figure it has to exist, on the other it can't possibly exist. Today, there is no known edge or border of the earth. The proposed antarctica is visited by tourists every year, and can be visited by FE:s themselves. There is obviously no edge there. There is also no edge in the arctic. There is also no edge in the pacific, neither in the atlantic. There is no recorded edge anywhere on earth that is known today. The edge has to go around the whole earth, so it has to be very large/long. It would be very hard to hide something that size. The lack of a border/edge makes perfect sense on a globe, but makes no sense on a flat plane.
Earth being tilted through dimensions has no scientific ground behind it. Might as well say that the edge bends space time, so if you try to cross it you walk through complicated bent space time and go out on the other side of the flat earth.