photographic evidence

Hello, thanks beforehand for any answers I might get to my question.

Has anyone, anyone of the people active here on the forum perhaps, taken any photographs with a landmark in the foreground and a landmark in the background, perhaps over a bay, separated by a distance larger than what global-earth theory dictates possible? Or has photographs been taken of landmarks like bridges far away, from sea level, where the bottom of the large bridge is visible, similar to the experiments by Rowbotham or Bount?

I read somewhere here about a general weariness of photographic evidence but still, it might be neat.

I took some pictures of a bridge and hillside across open water.  Superior mirage/refraction allowed the low parts to remain visible, but with a squashed appearance, compared to the same thing viewed from a higher location.  The non-distorted higher parts of the bridge and hillside had noticeably sunk toward the horizon in the low-level pictures.