If I thought the theory of gravity was correct, why would I consistently point out all of it's flaws? I came to these conclusions on my own, your conclusions were spoon fed to you and are regurgitated at anyone who doesn't believe them. There are plenty of others here that also disagree with the theory.
You see, that's the problem with you flat earthers. You seem to think that you are critical thinkers and that nobody else has come to conclusions on his own or has ever questioned in his mind what he has been taught, and in this arrogance, you miss the obvious flaws of your theories.
Now I ask you again: can you give me a single major problem with gravity?
I never said that, and I apologize if that is what you think I am saying. Of course anyone can come to their own conclusions. I doubt very much that most people question their scientific schooling very much. What I was specifically saying is that you are simply regurgitating what you were taught as fact, and implying that others here who question the theory of gravity are ridiculous.
To give you an example again on this thread let me choose the last one I had mentioned, objects in space are floating because they are in free fall. Anyone can see they are floating. Objects in space can float in any direction. I would not consider this falling, nor would almost anyone else before they were taught all the nuances of the theory of gravity.
So because it doesn't seem like falling to you, gravity isn't real?
And no, I'm not regurgitating anything.
Ok then, since you came to your conclusion that objects are in free fall instead of floating in space, please explain why they will float in all directions. Where are they falling towards? What makes them fall?
All objects whose parent is the Sun are falling towards the Sun. The Sun, as well as all the objects orbiting the Sun are all falling towards the center of the Milky Way (of which billions of other stars are falling towards). The Moon is falling towards the Earth, etc.. All this is irrelevant, really.
The real issue I see with your stance is that you don't truly accept FE because of gravity- besides, FE falls apart completely thanks to southern circumpolar stars- it's that you accept FE through a conspiracy which you have no evidence of. Gravity to you isn't real because you believe in a conspiracy. This is just invalid.
In reality, where it's obvious the Earth is round thanks to video, photography, southern circumpolar stars, modern science etc. you do not claim gravity is non-existent because it cannot be explained (which it can). And because it cannot be explained, the Earth must be flat. You can argue for anything using this logic. It's not logic at all.
This presupposition is the basis of your flawed beliefs. So first, prove the conspiracy. Then we can talk gravity.