apparently, anyone can have a moon picture now.
This is a nice picture of the Apollo 11 launch. But according to some flat earthers, it's actually a holographic projection?
Yeah right. You people sure do clutch at straws.
Thats a nice photo of how ludicrous those who believe that flaming bonbonerie went to the moon, realy are Where is the extra fuel you would need to get there .When your burning it at that rate ?.
Charles, it's obvious from your rather silly question 'Where is the extra fuel you would need', that your knowledge about the method by which the Apollo lunar landing missions were conducted is seriously lacking.
The sole purpose of the Saturn V rocket was to put the Command Service Module (CSM)and Lunar Excursion Module (LEM) into earth's orbit. Once escape velocity had been achieved, the only part of the entire assembly to travel to the moon was the CSM/LEM combination (pictured below). Because escape velocity had already been achieved, there was no need to use the rocket engines any longer, as the CSM/LEM was simply coasting to the moon, until it entered lunar orbit.
And the same on the return trip back to earth, once the CSM had achieved escape velocity from lunar orbit, it no longer needed to use its rocket engine as it was coasting back into earth's orbit.
So in conclusion, your expectation that HUGE amounts of fuel would be required is only based on profound ignorance, but this lack of knowledge is typical of hoax nutters such as yourself.
Incidentally, the Saturn V rocket did use quite a bit of fuel during the initial lift off into earth's orbit, burning 15 tons of fuel every second, for approximately 2 minutes (1st stage).
The following link explains everything about the mechanics behind the Saturn V rocket - very interesting reading.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn_V