Why do you have to contend with the sun? Is there sunlight coming directly into your eyes or illuminating the atmosphere to have to contend with it? You don't have to contend with anything. I don't know why you thought that makes sense.I think you are forgetting that light that doesn't directly hit you in the eyes in a natural, it is invisible. It's no less a mistake than what I told you before.
Now you seem to think that saying that stars are so far away is just an excuse. No it isn't. Tons of measurements of their distance exist. But you can just ignore them, those satanic scientists just want to manipulate you. But now a question has to be posed: what are stars in a flat earth model? Because in a heliocentric round Earth model, it's easy to explain: it's just very distant suns. The explanation is simple and elegant, and it passes the "test" of the Occam 's razor. In fact, it's such a good explanation, that it goes perfectly in line with the results that spectroscopy gives us, and the "inner workings" of stars are also perfectly explained. This doesn't necessarily mean an explanation is right, but if it collectively explains so much, it's a good indicator that there's actually truth in it.
You also seem to miss that even though we are moving at an immense speed relative to the galaxy center, most visible stars move WITH us, because they're on the same spiral. Think of our galaxy as a giant merry go round. Although you are moving at a considerable speed, do you see any "change" in the merry go round? When looking towards the center, you see the same thing you saw ten seconds ago. You look to your right, same thing. You look to your left, same thing once again. You look at the outer edge of the merry go round, same. It's pretty much the same for our galaxy, we're spinning around it. Now objects like other galaxies are also visible in the night sky, and they're not moving with us. However, these objects are extremely far away, so it's not visible. Their red and blue shifts have been measured though, and they ALSO go perfectly in line with current cosmology, not to mention the novae that have been discovered INSIDE those galaxies.. And before you jump in and say "but who measured the red and blue shifts? TEH LYING SATANIC SCIENTISTS DID!!!", well, no. Many amateurs do it as well. With the right equipment and sufficient knowledge, anyone can do it, and I personally know a person who has. Amateur spectroscopy is a major thing in the amateur astronomy community. And, contrary to what you believe, telescopes do work.
By the way, here's another coincidence for you: have you seen the patterns of dust and gasses visible on long exposure photos of our milky way? Guess what, similar ones exist in other galaxies as well... Hmm...
You also seem to be fixated on the idea that the night sky never changes. How do you know how the stars were 10000 years ago (well, probably not too different, as I explained to you, but you get the point). There clearly is progression. Just look up the supernovae that have been observed and documented over the history.