Even if New Horizons did take 10 pictures every second for navigation, it wouldn't have sent them all back to Earth. There is only so much bandwidth available for communicating to New Horizons and NASA would rather use it to receive useful data like photos of Pluto.
Are you sure you understand what the term "bandwidth" means in a telcom sense? Because your statement really was dumb.
That statement was actually spot-on. In this context "bandwidth" is "the transmission capacity of a computer network or other telecommunication system." Expressed in "bits per second".
NewHorizions probe current bandwidth is about 1 kbit/s. It is estimated that it will need > 16 months to transmit all the data captured during the Pluto flyby.
In 2007 when it flew by Jupiter it captured > 36Gb of data that took over a year to transmit it all back. At a time it's bandwidth was higher than it is now.
Bandwidth is not like getting $10 a week allowance and you have to save for 10 weeks to buy a $100 telescope. Bandwidth is instantaneous and occurring all the time. It did not have to save it up. Would you people please do a little research on telcom bandwidth? You probably think you have to save all of you miles per gallon in order to take a road trip. 
The only person who needs to do some research (on most topics actually) is you. First of all it _just_ captured Gigabytes of data as it flew by Pluto this week. Not just pictures btw, it has 6 other instruments that captured data as well. It will take 16 months to send it all back starting NOW. It couldn't use the bandwidth over the last 10 years to send back pictures it didn't take yet. Are you disagreeing with this fact?
Secondly most of the time (about 2/3) in the last 10 years it spent in hibernation mode. Up-to 200 days at a time, where it was completely asleep and not capturing any photos or sending any data back.
Thirdly, even if it didn't sleep 2/3 of the time, which it did , and even if it was capturing 10 pictures/s, which it didn't (at least not until Pluto fly-by), it could only send about 1/36000 of that at the available bandwidth. (1kbit/s == 450KB/hour == 1-2 hig-res pictures/hour.)
And don't forgot the time > 1 year it took to send the data it did capture during Jupiter fly-by.
So no, it wouldn't have time to send all the 10 pictures a second (which it didn't take).
But this point is moot, right? since space travel isn't possible at all, right? This is all made up, right? They probably just claiming small "bandwidth" to give themselves more time to CGI these images, right? Amazing how elaborate long planned and detailed the deception is.... Or maybe, just maybe, it's possible that they actually did do it? maybe? Nah, you couldn't possibly be wrong about this. Nope. It's inconceivable...