Outside this forum, I have seen many scientist and organizations get busted for fudging the numbers in order to make their adgenda sound more legitimate. Why do I have to explain it when round Earth scientists get busted for lying about global warming, or now climate change once the Earth was proven to not be warming? What are they going to lie about next? Another ice age? Oh, wait, that is what the scientist were clambering about back in the seventies, until it was proven false and they had to change gears and start going on about global warming, until that was proven false as well. So now, it is climate change. It seems that your scientists have finally picked something that can't be proven false, because the climate has always changed. 
Once again, you're wrong Jroa. These past 7 years have been the hottest years ever recorded. Climate change is directly proportional to the average solar output, added to the increasing levels of carbon in the atmosphere.
The last 15 years, solar output has been minuscule compared to 1950-2000. You can look all of this up. The sun hasn't been very luminescent for a little while. These patterns are also heavily monitored and compared.
So you tell me Jroa, if the climate isn't changing just based on the sun's output, and the sun's output has been minimal, and the last 7 years have been the hottest ever recorded, what must it be?
I'll give you a hint, it's carbon. Read a book, you nimrod.
Please, tell me why all of those "climatologists" got a so much trouble a few years back when their emails were hacked and it was shown that they were conspiring to lie about global warming. The facts are that the Earth's temperature rises and falls and has been through out time, despite what your Al Gore says. Scientists need to earn a living, just like you and I. And what better way to ensure funding.than to alarm everyone, whether or not there is something to alarm them about? Do you even watch the news, or did you just learn about "climate change" from your liberal high school teachers?
I'll take the assumption that my instructors were 'liberal' as a paltry stab at my credentials to speak on climate science. The term global warming is much older, and isn't widely used anymore, because it does not accurately reflect all available evidence. Is the Earth getting warmer? Yes. But why? Industrialization, of course. Increased carbon in the atmosphere means more heat, surely you cannot reject this, it's simple chemistry.
There is a known natural ice age cycle of the planet, where climate heats and cools in cycles. Natural atmospheric convection seems to keep this consistent, without anything adding in new factors (carbon released from an excess of hydrocarbon combustion).
Being ignorant in chemistry does hinder one from making accurate opinions (You), but I'm not surprised. It's really easy to feign knowledge on a forum where you have zero risk or consequence for being wrong. Of course, this could easily apply to me, as I'm sure you're going to accuse me of, but I assure you, the math works. Not only does it work, it's ridiculously consistent.