Can millions/billions/trillions/ etc miles of planets and stars etc really play a ring o ring of roses routine for us?
Absolutely not.
The answer is no, unless we accept the book of magic stories.
Are you not at least impressed that a book written at a time when 99% of humanity was illiterate does a good job of describing the true form of our world?
A long time ago, people knew the truth. It was probably plain, simple and obvious to them back then.
We are looking at a shooting gallery of reflections that are duplicating. We don't see that because we are merely tiny ants looking at one part of the dome.
It's why things get seen upside down on other parts of the circle. It's like a sort of kaleidoscope type carry on.
It's like being surrounded by mirrors with a big torch and shining it into the mirror. You see the larger light at first but if you look at the reflection of the light in the reflection of the next mirror and so on and so on, you see the classic shrinking lights as far as your eyes can see. All you see are suns to stars in a way, if that's what your mind wants to tell you.
I envision a
meniscus in the center of the dome. This creates a
double parabolic mirror effect from which a disco-ball effect is naturally projected onto the dome for us to admire.
As well, the changing height of the sun will also
create the effect of the crescent moon since reflection back onto the dome will be partially blocked by the low-hanging meniscus.
This Earth is simplicity in its running and our life is dependent on what the core gives out from the decay that fuels it.
We are bacteria eating away at a rotten apple but keeps branching out and growing the pips, over time.
Is there any reason to believe that it can go on forever? Could things slow down to a crawl or stop?
Magnets are simply trapped pressures that require equalisation. They are merely dense metal atmosphere trappers.
How? Trapped by what?
What do you mean by require? and what is equalization?
I am not trying to be ornery. I am now confused because I can not envision what is "equal" between an air molecule and a piece of metal. The concept seems blurred in air pressure. These actions/reactions occur independent of our observations and our choice of quantization.
I believe you are using "equalization" as a catch-all for a much simpler concept which I believe is better expressed in terms which would answer the question: What are these things doing to eachother in motion? How do these objects move?
We all matter but no more than mould matters in breaking down matter.
I am impressed that the truth about our world was given to mankind in no uncertain terms many moons ago.
We have to matter to somebody. What twisted force of nature would be so neurotically compelled to mislead us?
So, it is a physical object.
I think so. A super carbon/graphite kind of thing.
Would you expect it to attract gaseous carbon towards it?
Is it possible to surmise the distance of air above the sun and below the dome?
It's like a fountain in a way, of various stages of atmosphere spilling out in waves. I'm probably not explaining this well as I'm in a hurry to go out.
No, you are not explaining this well but that is ok.
You are giving my mind a creative challenge!