Disproof of gravity

  • 1389 Replies
  • 247115 Views
*

mikeman7918

  • 5431
  • Round Earther
Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #120 on: June 26, 2015, 11:06:38 AM »
What is pushed up by a force must also fall with equal reactive force. It's easier to carry a tennis ball up a skyscraper. It would be hard to carry a bowling ball up a skyscraper. Assuming walking up steps.
Once at the top, if you drop both balls, you will notice that the bowling ball falls much faster.
The reason for this is simple if people cared to look at it. The bowling ball is much more dense and can repel much more ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE upon it than the tennis ball which is filled with sea level atmospheric pressure to start with so most of it is already part of the atmosphere and all that is repelling the atmosphere, is the skin of the ball. The 5 mm thick rubber.

At the top of that skyscraper, the atmosphere still wants to push that ball back down to the ground because you are simply holding it up by your energy, still, which you have done up to that height. Therefore that bowling ball has to hit that ground with the same reactive energy to the active energy you gave it.
The tennis ball is the same but due to it being far easier to carry up, you'll see a remarkable difference in the speed of them hitting the ground as well as the force.

Doing this from shoulder height is bullshit. Also doing this in a so called vacuum is also bullshit because there's not a vacuum chamber big enough that can push a vacuum enough to test this out.
Of course we get told there's a huge one but that's about as true as all the rest of the bullshit. The large one can maybe evacuate a small amount of pressure.

100% gravity does not exist. It is a total fabrication.

I just realized that balloons floating up is proof that denpressure is not real.  How would density effect something if air pressure is the only force acting on it?  Another disproof of denpressure is things like beach balls sinking in air and floating in water.  Water is denser then air, and according to denpressure that should make the beach ball heavier in water
I am having a video war with Jeranism.
See the thread about it here.

*

mikeman7918

  • 5431
  • Round Earther
Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #121 on: June 26, 2015, 11:08:14 AM »
Gravity is science - science is fake and trickery.

Modern medicine came about because of science and it clearly works.  Computers were invented with science and they clearly work.  You cannot deny that science works because it's so obvious.
I am having a video war with Jeranism.
See the thread about it here.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30059
Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #122 on: June 26, 2015, 11:10:30 AM »
What is pushed up by a force must also fall with equal reactive force. It's easier to carry a tennis ball up a skyscraper. It would be hard to carry a bowling ball up a skyscraper. Assuming walking up steps.
Once at the top, if you drop both balls, you will notice that the bowling ball falls much faster.
The reason for this is simple if people cared to look at it. The bowling ball is much more dense and can repel much more ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE upon it than the tennis ball which is filled with sea level atmospheric pressure to start with so most of it is already part of the atmosphere and all that is repelling the atmosphere, is the skin of the ball. The 5 mm thick rubber.

At the top of that skyscraper, the atmosphere still wants to push that ball back down to the ground because you are simply holding it up by your energy, still, which you have done up to that height. Therefore that bowling ball has to hit that ground with the same reactive energy to the active energy you gave it.
The tennis ball is the same but due to it being far easier to carry up, you'll see a remarkable difference in the speed of them hitting the ground as well as the force.

Doing this from shoulder height is bullshit. Also doing this in a so called vacuum is also bullshit because there's not a vacuum chamber big enough that can push a vacuum enough to test this out.
Of course we get told there's a huge one but that's about as true as all the rest of the bullshit. The large one can maybe evacuate a small amount of pressure.

100% gravity does not exist. It is a total fabrication.

I just realized that balloons floating up is proof that denpressure is not real.  How would density effect something if air pressure is the only force acting on it?  Another disproof of denpressure is things like beach balls sinking in air and floating in water.  Water is denser then air, and according to denpressure that should make the beach ball heavier in water
You would have been better paying attention to what I've been saying instead of jumping right in on your guard like a conscientious sentry.

Can you ever recall me saying that denpressure PUSHES and Squeezes any dense object/matter?
Have a ponder over that and you might grasp what I've been saying.

Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #123 on: June 26, 2015, 11:11:07 AM »
Gravity is science - science is fake and trickery.

Modern medicine came about because of science and it clearly works.  Computers were invented with science and they clearly work.  You cannot deny that science works because it's so obvious.
Modern medicine=science=trickery computers=hand craftsmanship very very different from the essence of cheating and fraud in science.

Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #124 on: June 26, 2015, 11:13:21 AM »
What is pushed up by a force must also fall with equal reactive force. It's easier to carry a tennis ball up a skyscraper. It would be hard to carry a bowling ball up a skyscraper. Assuming walking up steps.
Once at the top, if you drop both balls, you will notice that the bowling ball falls much faster.
The reason for this is simple if people cared to look at it. The bowling ball is much more dense and can repel much more ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE upon it than the tennis ball which is filled with sea level atmospheric pressure to start with so most of it is already part of the atmosphere and all that is repelling the atmosphere, is the skin of the ball. The 5 mm thick rubber.

At the top of that skyscraper, the atmosphere still wants to push that ball back down to the ground because you are simply holding it up by your energy, still, which you have done up to that height. Therefore that bowling ball has to hit that ground with the same reactive energy to the active energy you gave it.
The tennis ball is the same but due to it being far easier to carry up, you'll see a remarkable difference in the speed of them hitting the ground as well as the force.

Doing this from shoulder height is bullshit. Also doing this in a so called vacuum is also bullshit because there's not a vacuum chamber big enough that can push a vacuum enough to test this out.
Of course we get told there's a huge one but that's about as true as all the rest of the bullshit. The large one can maybe evacuate a small amount of pressure.

100% gravity does not exist. It is a total fabrication.

I just realized that balloons floating up is proof that denpressure is not real.  How would density effect something if air pressure is the only force acting on it?  Another disproof of denpressure is things like beach balls sinking in air and floating in water.  Water is denser then air, and according to denpressure that should make the beach ball heavier in water
Why things attract downwards it's two thing: weight+size it take relative to weight.
Beach balls are way heavier and small in size than the air could hold them floating, but water is much more stronger.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30059
Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #125 on: June 26, 2015, 11:13:43 AM »
Gravity is science - science is fake and trickery.

Modern medicine came about because of science and it clearly works.  Computers were invented with science and they clearly work.  You cannot deny that science works because it's so obvious.
Real science does work. The massive issue is about the so called science and how it works in reality instead of fantasy, plus the science where it's blatantly made up to hide the real science behind it.

Gravity is one such thing. It's a lie and the truth is, it's atmospheric pressure.

*

Rayzor

  • 12111
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #126 on: June 26, 2015, 11:14:36 AM »
100% gravity does not exist. It is a total fabrication.

At the risk of confusing the issue at hand, that statement might be closer to truth than you realise ( or intended )  what we interpret as gravity is distortion of space-time by mass,  so does gravity really exist.  I don't know that there is an easy answer to that,   some might say that on a galactic scale our understanding of gravity is flawed, in the sense it doesn't match observed galactic rotation profiles,  so dark matter is proposed as a kind of fudge factor.  Although it might still be proven to be exist. 

Back on less than galactic scales,  the force we call gravity behaves exactly according to Newton,  and it's predictions are accurate.    The denspressure theory neglects to explain why some things are heavier than others,  what causes the density to change from the bowling ball to the tennis ball?   The mass per unit volume is different,  we know what volume is, so what determines the force acting on the mass to cause the density to be different?    Gravity.

Why  does the bowling ball weigh more than the tennis ball in denspressure theory?

Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #127 on: June 26, 2015, 11:16:05 AM »
100% gravity does not exist. It is a total fabrication.

At the risk of confusing the issue at hand, that statement might be closer to truth than you realise ( or intended )  what we interpret as gravity is distortion of space-time by mass,  so does gravity really exist.  I don't know that there is an easy answer to that,   some might say that on a galactic scale our understanding of gravity is flawed, in the sense it doesn't match observed galactic rotation profiles,  so dark matter is proposed as a kind of fudge factor.  Although it might still be proven to be exist. 

Back on less than galactic scales,  the force we call gravity behaves exactly according to Newton,  and it's predictions are accurate.    The denspressure theory neglects to explain why some things are heavier than others,  what causes the density to change from the bowling ball to the tennis ball?   The mass per unit volume is different,  we know what volume is, so what determines the force acting on the mass to cause the density to be different?    Gravity.

Why  does the bowling ball weigh more than the tennis ball in denspressure theory?
Weight is another constant in nature that god created.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30059
Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #128 on: June 26, 2015, 11:26:03 AM »
100% gravity does not exist. It is a total fabrication.

At the risk of confusing the issue at hand, that statement might be closer to truth than you realise ( or intended )  what we interpret as gravity is distortion of space-time by mass,  so does gravity really exist.  I don't know that there is an easy answer to that,   some might say that on a galactic scale our understanding of gravity is flawed, in the sense it doesn't match observed galactic rotation profiles,  so dark matter is proposed as a kind of fudge factor.  Although it might still be proven to be exist. 

Back on less than galactic scales,  the force we call gravity behaves exactly according to Newton,  and it's predictions are accurate.    The denspressure theory neglects to explain why some things are heavier than others,  what causes the density to change from the bowling ball to the tennis ball?   The mass per unit volume is different,  we know what volume is, so what determines the force acting on the mass to cause the density to be different?    Gravity.

Why  does the bowling ball weigh more than the tennis ball in denspressure theory?
A bowling ball weighs more than a tennis ball because man made a measuring tool to measure density of matter that acts against the atmosphere pushing down onto the object with that object creating a  resistant force against it. This is measured on a scale plate, only now, the scale plate is the thing that is acting as the leverage against the atmosphere, instead of the ground or a persons hand or whatever holds it up against the atmosphere.

The tennis ball has less mass and is also filled with atmosphere that is already allowing the outer skin of that ball to resist the atmosphere. The reason why it's much lighter is because the air is already absorbed as part of the ball with it being trapped in it.

Fill that tennis ball with lead and it expels the atmosphere inside of it. With lead being so dense, atmosphere cannot absorb into it very well - in fact very minutely.
This means the tennis ball will now resist the atmosphere massively compared to the air filled one and that will reflect on a scale plate due to resistance against the atmosphere by using that scale plate as a leverage.


*

Rayzor

  • 12111
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #129 on: June 26, 2015, 11:43:19 AM »
100% gravity does not exist. It is a total fabrication.

At the risk of confusing the issue at hand, that statement might be closer to truth than you realise ( or intended )  what we interpret as gravity is distortion of space-time by mass,  so does gravity really exist.  I don't know that there is an easy answer to that,   some might say that on a galactic scale our understanding of gravity is flawed, in the sense it doesn't match observed galactic rotation profiles,  so dark matter is proposed as a kind of fudge factor.  Although it might still be proven to be exist. 

Back on less than galactic scales,  the force we call gravity behaves exactly according to Newton,  and it's predictions are accurate.    The denspressure theory neglects to explain why some things are heavier than others,  what causes the density to change from the bowling ball to the tennis ball?   The mass per unit volume is different,  we know what volume is, so what determines the force acting on the mass to cause the density to be different?    Gravity.

Why  does the bowling ball weigh more than the tennis ball in denspressure theory?
A bowling ball weighs more than a tennis ball because man made a measuring tool to measure density of matter that acts against the atmosphere pushing down onto the object with that object creating a  resistant force against it. This is measured on a scale plate, only now, the scale plate is the thing that is acting as the leverage against the atmosphere, instead of the ground or a persons hand or whatever holds it up against the atmosphere.

The tennis ball has less mass and is also filled with atmosphere that is already allowing the outer skin of that ball to resist the atmosphere. The reason why it's much lighter is because the air is already absorbed as part of the ball with it being trapped in it.

Fill that tennis ball with lead and it expels the atmosphere inside of it. With lead being so dense, atmosphere cannot absorb into it very well - in fact very minutely.
This means the tennis ball will now resist the atmosphere massively compared to the air filled one and that will reflect on a scale plate due to resistance against the atmosphere by using that scale plate as a leverage.

As modestman said,  God gives things weight.    Where does the weight come from?     Take away the atmosphere by putting something in a vacuum chamber and it still has weight, so it doesn't come from atmospheric pressure,  there has to be something else at work to give things weight.
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #130 on: June 26, 2015, 11:45:25 AM »
<==== Sceptimatics denpressure and weight ideas.

100% gravity does not exist. It is a total fabrication.

At the risk of confusing the issue at hand, that statement might be closer to truth than you realise ( or intended )  what we interpret as gravity is distortion of space-time by mass,  so does gravity really exist.  I don't know that there is an easy answer to that,   some might say that on a galactic scale our understanding of gravity is flawed, in the sense it doesn't match observed galactic rotation profiles,  so dark matter is proposed as a kind of fudge factor.  Although it might still be proven to be exist. 

Back on less than galactic scales,  the force we call gravity behaves exactly according to Newton,  and it's predictions are accurate.    The denspressure theory neglects to explain why some things are heavier than others,  what causes the density to change from the bowling ball to the tennis ball?   The mass per unit volume is different,  we know what volume is, so what determines the force acting on the mass to cause the density to be different?    Gravity.

Why  does the bowling ball weigh more than the tennis ball in denspressure theory?
A bowling ball weighs more than a tennis ball because man made a measuring tool to measure density of matter that acts against the atmosphere pushing down onto the object with that object creating a  resistant force against it. This is measured on a scale plate, only now, the scale plate is the thing that is acting as the leverage against the atmosphere, instead of the ground or a persons hand or whatever holds it up against the atmosphere.

The tennis ball has less mass and is also filled with atmosphere that is already allowing the outer skin of that ball to resist the atmosphere. The reason why it's much lighter is because the air is already absorbed as part of the ball with it being trapped in it.

Fill that tennis ball with lead and it expels the atmosphere inside of it. With lead being so dense, atmosphere cannot absorb into it very well - in fact very minutely.
This means the tennis ball will now resist the atmosphere massively compared to the air filled one and that will reflect on a scale plate due to resistance against the atmosphere by using that scale plate as a leverage.
Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by ignorance or stupidity.

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
« Last Edit: June 26, 2015, 12:29:12 PM by sokarul »
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

Rayzor

  • 12111
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #132 on: June 26, 2015, 11:51:07 AM »
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

mikeman7918

  • 5431
  • Round Earther
Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #133 on: June 26, 2015, 11:53:25 AM »
Weight is another constant in nature that god created.

That's like saying that your car works because an engineer designed it.  That explains why it works, not how it works.  Just because an engineer designed your car doesn't mean that it won't do you good learning how it works.  God made things have weight by making gravity.
I am having a video war with Jeranism.
See the thread about it here.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30059
Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #134 on: June 26, 2015, 11:53:56 AM »
100% gravity does not exist. It is a total fabrication.

At the risk of confusing the issue at hand, that statement might be closer to truth than you realise ( or intended )  what we interpret as gravity is distortion of space-time by mass,  so does gravity really exist.  I don't know that there is an easy answer to that,   some might say that on a galactic scale our understanding of gravity is flawed, in the sense it doesn't match observed galactic rotation profiles,  so dark matter is proposed as a kind of fudge factor.  Although it might still be proven to be exist. 

Back on less than galactic scales,  the force we call gravity behaves exactly according to Newton,  and it's predictions are accurate.    The denspressure theory neglects to explain why some things are heavier than others,  what causes the density to change from the bowling ball to the tennis ball?   The mass per unit volume is different,  we know what volume is, so what determines the force acting on the mass to cause the density to be different?    Gravity.

Why  does the bowling ball weigh more than the tennis ball in denspressure theory?
A bowling ball weighs more than a tennis ball because man made a measuring tool to measure density of matter that acts against the atmosphere pushing down onto the object with that object creating a  resistant force against it. This is measured on a scale plate, only now, the scale plate is the thing that is acting as the leverage against the atmosphere, instead of the ground or a persons hand or whatever holds it up against the atmosphere.

The tennis ball has less mass and is also filled with atmosphere that is already allowing the outer skin of that ball to resist the atmosphere. The reason why it's much lighter is because the air is already absorbed as part of the ball with it being trapped in it.

Fill that tennis ball with lead and it expels the atmosphere inside of it. With lead being so dense, atmosphere cannot absorb into it very well - in fact very minutely.
This means the tennis ball will now resist the atmosphere massively compared to the air filled one and that will reflect on a scale plate due to resistance against the atmosphere by using that scale plate as a leverage.

As modestman said,  God gives things weight.    Where does the weight come from?     Take away the atmosphere by putting something in a vacuum chamber and it still has weight, so it doesn't come from atmospheric pressure,  there has to be something else at work to give things weight.
How do you put something in a vacuum  chamber without applying energy in doing so?
How do you hang something high up in a vacuum chamber?
Here's a question for you. Can you walk into a vacuum chamber and place a bowling ball inside of it and watch it drop whilst you are still inside this chamber?

Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #135 on: June 26, 2015, 11:55:13 AM »
WOW Sokarul actually admitted he is shill. look he came from the industry that why he is lying.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30059
Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #136 on: June 26, 2015, 11:55:45 AM »

*

Rayzor

  • 12111
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #137 on: June 26, 2015, 11:57:53 AM »
100% gravity does not exist. It is a total fabrication.

At the risk of confusing the issue at hand, that statement might be closer to truth than you realise ( or intended )  what we interpret as gravity is distortion of space-time by mass,  so does gravity really exist.  I don't know that there is an easy answer to that,   some might say that on a galactic scale our understanding of gravity is flawed, in the sense it doesn't match observed galactic rotation profiles,  so dark matter is proposed as a kind of fudge factor.  Although it might still be proven to be exist. 

Back on less than galactic scales,  the force we call gravity behaves exactly according to Newton,  and it's predictions are accurate.    The denspressure theory neglects to explain why some things are heavier than others,  what causes the density to change from the bowling ball to the tennis ball?   The mass per unit volume is different,  we know what volume is, so what determines the force acting on the mass to cause the density to be different?    Gravity.

Why  does the bowling ball weigh more than the tennis ball in denspressure theory?
A bowling ball weighs more than a tennis ball because man made a measuring tool to measure density of matter that acts against the atmosphere pushing down onto the object with that object creating a  resistant force against it. This is measured on a scale plate, only now, the scale plate is the thing that is acting as the leverage against the atmosphere, instead of the ground or a persons hand or whatever holds it up against the atmosphere.

The tennis ball has less mass and is also filled with atmosphere that is already allowing the outer skin of that ball to resist the atmosphere. The reason why it's much lighter is because the air is already absorbed as part of the ball with it being trapped in it.

Fill that tennis ball with lead and it expels the atmosphere inside of it. With lead being so dense, atmosphere cannot absorb into it very well - in fact very minutely.
This means the tennis ball will now resist the atmosphere massively compared to the air filled one and that will reflect on a scale plate due to resistance against the atmosphere by using that scale plate as a leverage.

As modestman said,  God gives things weight.    Where does the weight come from?     Take away the atmosphere by putting something in a vacuum chamber and it still has weight, so it doesn't come from atmospheric pressure,  there has to be something else at work to give things weight.
How do you put something in a vacuum  chamber without applying energy in doing so?
How do you hang something high up in a vacuum chamber?
Here's a question for you. Can you walk into a vacuum chamber and place a bowling ball inside of it and watch it drop whilst you are still inside this chamber?

Already linked to the videos of weighing in a vacuum chamber.  So go back a couple of posts.

Now Sokarol can take over,  I'll be back tomorrow for the next installment.
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #138 on: June 26, 2015, 11:58:48 AM »
Weight is another constant in nature that god created.

That's like saying that your car works because an engineer designed it.  That explains why it works, not how it works.  Just because an engineer designed your car doesn't mean that it won't do you good learning how it works.  God made things have weight by making gravity.
what an idiot god so lunatic why not making thing simple ?

*

Yendor

  • 1676
Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #139 on: June 26, 2015, 12:08:33 PM »
Hey Yendor, I noticed you use horizontal rules a lot and you do them like this:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

But did you know that the forum has an official horizontal rule tag?
Here it is:



The option to make them is right next to the list tags in the formatting section.

Thanks mikeman,

I didn't know about that rule.
Yendor
"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
                              George Orwell

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #140 on: June 26, 2015, 12:31:26 PM »
100% gravity does not exist. It is a total fabrication.

At the risk of confusing the issue at hand, that statement might be closer to truth than you realise ( or intended )  what we interpret as gravity is distortion of space-time by mass,  so does gravity really exist.  I don't know that there is an easy answer to that,   some might say that on a galactic scale our understanding of gravity is flawed, in the sense it doesn't match observed galactic rotation profiles,  so dark matter is proposed as a kind of fudge factor.  Although it might still be proven to be exist. 

Back on less than galactic scales,  the force we call gravity behaves exactly according to Newton,  and it's predictions are accurate.    The denspressure theory neglects to explain why some things are heavier than others,  what causes the density to change from the bowling ball to the tennis ball?   The mass per unit volume is different,  we know what volume is, so what determines the force acting on the mass to cause the density to be different?    Gravity.

Why  does the bowling ball weigh more than the tennis ball in denspressure theory?
A bowling ball weighs more than a tennis ball because man made a measuring tool to measure density of matter that acts against the atmosphere pushing down onto the object with that object creating a  resistant force against it. This is measured on a scale plate, only now, the scale plate is the thing that is acting as the leverage against the atmosphere, instead of the ground or a persons hand or whatever holds it up against the atmosphere.

The tennis ball has less mass and is also filled with atmosphere that is already allowing the outer skin of that ball to resist the atmosphere. The reason why it's much lighter is because the air is already absorbed as part of the ball with it being trapped in it.

Fill that tennis ball with lead and it expels the atmosphere inside of it. With lead being so dense, atmosphere cannot absorb into it very well - in fact very minutely.
This means the tennis ball will now resist the atmosphere massively compared to the air filled one and that will reflect on a scale plate due to resistance against the atmosphere by using that scale plate as a leverage.

As modestman said,  God gives things weight.    Where does the weight come from?     Take away the atmosphere by putting something in a vacuum chamber and it still has weight, so it doesn't come from atmospheric pressure,  there has to be something else at work to give things weight.
How do you put something in a vacuum  chamber without applying energy in doing so?
How do you hang something high up in a vacuum chamber?
Here's a question for you. Can you walk into a vacuum chamber and place a bowling ball inside of it and watch it drop whilst you are still inside this chamber?
We know the difference between potential and kinetic energy.
With a hook.
No, a person cannot stand in a vacuum chamber.
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

Yendor

  • 1676
Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #141 on: June 26, 2015, 12:38:35 PM »
Mikeman,

When you read articles like this doesn't it make you, at least, wonder a little bit about what is real. Please be honest with me.
Please read this link and get back with me.

http://aetherforce.com/electrical-engineer-disproves-einsteins-relativity-theory-the-ruins-of-106-years-relativity/

Yendor
"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
                              George Orwell

Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #142 on: June 26, 2015, 01:05:14 PM »
First one needs to comprehend dynamics in an inertial frame. Only when that is done and dusted can you consider deviations occurring in a non inertial frame.

*

mikeman7918

  • 5431
  • Round Earther
Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #143 on: June 26, 2015, 01:15:40 PM »
what an idiot god so lunatic why not making thing simple ?

Because then life would be simple, and that's not what God wanted.  Life is supposed to be challenging.
I am having a video war with Jeranism.
See the thread about it here.

Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #144 on: June 26, 2015, 01:17:57 PM »
what an idiot god so lunatic why not making thing simple ?

Because then life would be simple, and that's not what God wanted.  Life is supposed to be challenging.
elements of life should be elegant do you agree ?

*

mikeman7918

  • 5431
  • Round Earther
Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #145 on: June 26, 2015, 01:21:36 PM »
Mikeman,

When you read articles like this doesn't it make you, at least, wonder a little bit about what is real. Please be honest with me.
Please read this link and get back with me.

http://aetherforce.com/electrical-engineer-disproves-einsteins-relativity-theory-the-ruins-of-106-years-relativity/

Yendor

No, not really.

There are many ways to prove relativity, some of which use only logic.  The website you linked to doesn't look like a very reputable one and as far as I can tell the only evidence they posted is that some electrical engineer thinks that relativity is false when in fact relativity is needed to understand electricity and electrical engineering it's self proves relativity.

Relativity is even how electromagnets work, and electromagnets are responsible for many electrical devices working like transformers, motors, and speakers.

#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">! No longer available

An electrical engineer doubting relativity is like an airline pilot doubting that airplanes work.
I am having a video war with Jeranism.
See the thread about it here.

*

mikeman7918

  • 5431
  • Round Earther
Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #146 on: June 26, 2015, 01:22:49 PM »
what an idiot god so lunatic why not making thing simple ?

Because then life would be simple, and that's not what God wanted.  Life is supposed to be challenging.
elements of life should be elegant do you agree ?

What part of 4 fundamental forces governing all motion is not elegant?  If you think that physics is not elegant that you clearly haven't studied it much.
I am having a video war with Jeranism.
See the thread about it here.

Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #147 on: June 26, 2015, 01:24:08 PM »
what an idiot god so lunatic why not making thing simple ?

Because then life would be simple, and that's not what God wanted.  Life is supposed to be challenging.
elements of life should be elegant do you agree ?

What part of 4 fundamental forces governing all motion is not elegant?  If you think that physics is not elegant that you clearly haven't studied it much.
Tell me, creating a ball earth which people has to navigate with a curve and live with their head upside down and then creating a law which keep them on ground just to cover up the shape of the earth is sound like elegant to you ?

Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #148 on: June 26, 2015, 01:27:12 PM »
To make the earth tilted , to make the earth rotating, to make the sun moving in 65000 mph in the universe just for life to be sustainable does it sound to you elegant ? I find it clumsy only as human weakness can guess.

*

mikeman7918

  • 5431
  • Round Earther
Re: Disproof of gravity
« Reply #149 on: June 26, 2015, 01:31:43 PM »
Tell me, creating a ball earth which people has to navigate with a curve and live with their head upside down and then creating a law which keep them on ground just to cover up the shape of the earth is sound like elegant to you ?

Yes, it does.  God created the laws of physics in such a way that when a bunch of matter is introduced via the big bang it forms into the incredible complexity we see all by it's self.  How is that not elegant?
I am having a video war with Jeranism.
See the thread about it here.