I've mixed no frame of reference up. I can only realistically go by one frame of reference and that's by me being on the ground.
That's the one where the rotation of the Earth is ignored. OK.
I'll make this easier for you people.
I'm on the ground and allegedly travelling at approx, 1000mph on your pathetic made up globe.
A plane on the tarmac is doing exactly the same.
I look at the plane and see it standing still.
The pilot of the planes sees me standing still.
So far, so good, except the 1000 mi/hr can be ignored since velocity is measured relative to you. This may be where you're confusing yourself.
Ok, the plane takes off and flies against the rotation.
What rotation? You were working in your topocentric reference frame (that's the one where the point you're standing is considered stationary and all other motion is relative to that). Remember?
I can only realistically go by one frame of reference and that's by me being on the ground.
So, we have in the topocentric frame:
I'm on the ground
and allegedly travelling at approx, 1000mph on your pathetic made up globe.
A plane on the tarmac is
doing exactly the same not moving with respect to me.
I look at the plane and see it standing still.
The pilot of the planes sees me standing still.
No rotation in that reference frame.
It reaches a speed of 1000 mph against that rotation. It was already moving at 1000 mph before it took off but by flying at 1000 mph against the 1000 mph speed of the solid Earth, it should by logical reasoning be now hovering over a stationary Earth with it's air speed reading 1000 mph.
Oopsies.
I've mixed no frame of reference up.
Nope. Sorry. It
wasn't already moving at 1000 mph before it took off in the reference frame
you selected. Remember?
I can only realistically go by one frame of reference and that's by me being on the ground.
I look at the plane and see it standing still.
The pilot of the planes sees me standing still.
You're the one that said that. Are you sure you know what a reference frame is? You can't tell if you're mixing them up if you don't know what they are!
By this time in fantasy world, I would be 1000 miles away from it and as long as that jet keeps a constant 1000 mph speed against the Earth's so called rotation, I'll always be 1000 miles away from the jet.
So not only do you get your reference frames confused, you also don't know the difference between distance and velocity. A plane traveling 1000 mi/hr will
always be 1000 miles from you? Really? If someone standing next to you walks away at 3 mi/hr and you don't move, you think that means they're
always 3 miles from you if they keep walking at that pace? Surely you jest! Maybe you just want to see if anyone actually reads what you write.
We already knew you were baffled by the distinction between velocity and acceleration from your
"the Space Shuttle must accelerate at 5 mi/sec2 to reach 17000 mi/hr in 8 minutes" fiasco. Remember that one? Lots of people aren't exactly sure how those relate to each other, so that's not
quite so surprising.
This would be the reality, yet obviously we never see the reality because it's a load of bullshit and the Earth does not spin at all. The Earth is as still as a wax work dummy and the only things that are moving around on it, are us and all other animals and plant life, etc, plus the reflective lights in the sky.
Maybe
you don't see the obvious reality and "retaliate" by calling it BS and making up something else entirely. We can only hope it makes you feel better about yourself because, frankly, reality don't give a damn what you think.