http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_relativity
It's difficult for you to admit that your models are based on 'what this and that should/could be and do IF this and that....'
Assumptions, assumptions, assumptions........
You really need to learn what a theory is.
Do some homework http://www.maths.bris.ac.uk/~madjl/course_text.pdf
You are not helpful but a joke.
Already done 6 years ago. Did you learn what a theory is yet?
A good description of the model will begin with an organized and complete
description of important factors and observations. The description will often use
data gathered from observations of the problem. It will also include the statement
of scientific laws and relations that apply to the important factors. From there,
the model must summarize and condense the observations into a small set of
hypotheses that capture the essence of the observations. The small set of
hypotheses is a restatement of the problem, changing the problem from a
descriptive, even colloquial, question into a precise formulation that moves the
statement from the general to the specific. This sets the stage for the modeler to
demonstrate a clear link between the listed assumptions and the building of the
model.
The hypotheses translate into a mathematical structure that becomes the
heart of the mathematical model. Many mathematical models, particularly those
from physics and engineering, become a single equation but mathematical models
need not be a single concise equation............
I'm not asking you again, it's obvious your mind is screwed up a long time ago.
Good luck with your assumptions and belief system.