evidence clouds do not exist

I know about dual-earth theory.
you clearly do not. there is no computing power needed. there is nothing special going on, just light moving through space: it is the space that is 'projected: that is, it flows to a position above the earth. why would it not be visible from all directions?  if you knew the dual earth model of the sun, you would know that. the sun does not achieve it, aether does.

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on May 29, 2015, 12:20:01 PM

I know about dual-earth theory.
you clearly do not. there is no computing power needed. there is nothing special going on, just light moving through space: it is the space that is 'projected: that is, it flows to a position above the earth. why would it not be visible from all directions?  if you knew the dual earth model of the sun, you would know that. the sun does not achieve it, aether does.

Actually the dual-earth theory states that the dual-hemiplane Earth rotates around the Sun, and around its own axis. You clearly are not informed about the latest version of this theory.

read the current model thread you illiterate moron. i know my own theory. if you are not going to be serious do not interrupt a scientific conversation.

shut up and go away. have your own theory if you want, do not put words in my mouth, i am tired of how pathetic all of you are. you aren't even capable of defending your own theories without falling back on blatant straw men. thank you for making it clear to everyone where your intelligence and open-mindedness stops. just fuck off.

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on May 29, 2015, 12:39:47 PM

shut up and go away. have your own theory if you want, do not put words in my mouth, i am tired of how pathetic all of you are. you aren't even capable of defending your own theories without falling back on blatant straw men. thank you for making it clear to everyone where your intelligence and open-mindedness stops. just fuck off.

Sorry, dude, you're outdated. No need to be angry about it. You made the foundation of the theory, after all. It was just improved. You should be proud, not angry.

go fuck yourself you patronizing little asswipe. i have put a lot of work into my theory, pay attention to what i have actually stated and put forth or just fuck off. you are wasting time at this point. you have nothing to say. stop posting. stop wasting time.

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on May 29, 2015, 12:43:49 PM

go fuck yourself you patronizing little asswipe. i have put a lot of work into my theory, pay attention to what i have actually stated and put forth or just fuck off. you are wasting time at this point. you have nothing to say. stop posting. stop wasting time.

Dude, you're a scientist. Scientists know when they're outdated, and accept it. No need to swear and get angry.

you are a moron. fuck off, i am sick of you. stop ignoring the work i have put in to creating a working model of the world. you are a waste of time and space. just leave and stop wasting everybody's time. some of us are actually trying to have a scientific duscussion, do you mind not derailing everything with your utter bs?
if you really want to talk about your model, start your own thread, stop ruining mine.

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on May 29, 2015, 12:49:56 PM

you are a moron. fuck off, i am sick of you. stop ignoring the work i have put in to creating a working model of the world. you are a waste of time and space. just leave and stop wasting everybody's time. some of us are actually trying to have a scientific duscussion, do you mind not derailing everything with your utter bs?
if you really want to talk about your model, start your own thread, stop ruining mine.

You're just angry I improved your outdated model. It's okay, some people have a hard time moving forward. Just wait it out. I did not cancel your work. I just improved it.

I know about dual-earth theory.
you clearly do not. there is no computing power needed. there is nothing special going on, just light moving through space: it is the space that is 'projected: that is, it flows to a position above the earth. why would it not be visible from all directions?  if you knew the dual earth model of the sun, you would know that. the sun does not achieve it, aether does.

Where is your ground breaking optical research that would win you a Nobel prize?
if you're not even going to read anything i post, why do you ask questions that clearly have no merit?

Jrowe, if you want to convince people of your theory then there are better ways of doing that then insulting those who ask questions about it.  Don't automatically assume that everyone is reading every one of your posts.  Has it ever occurred to you that the reason nobody understands your theory is because you suck at explaining it?

pay attention. i insult when i am disrespected.

Slightly alternate logic here, but I'd like to introduce a new idea. Ash. Ash is heavier than air, this is easily observed in fireplaces, and the fact that it falls. How come there can be ash clouds if ash is heavier than air?

Have you never heard of ash clouds? Also the energy given to them by sunlight and other forms of heat explain the energy (in the form of heat) via the processes of radiation and conduction.

HOW. DOES. LIQUID. WATER. FLY

take samples and run chemical tests for the presence of H2O
water vapor exists at that altitude. why do you refuse to learn about what you're whining about?

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on June 02, 2015, 05:50:03 AM

take samples and run chemical tests for the presence of H2O
water vapor exists at that altitude. why do you refuse to learn about what you're whining about?

Then take samples both inside of and outside of clouds.

Quote from: mikeman7918 on June 02, 2015, 12:46:04 PM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on June 02, 2015, 05:50:03 AM

take samples and run chemical tests for the presence of H2O
water vapor exists at that altitude. why do you refuse to learn about what you're whining about?

Then take samples both inside of and outside of clouds.

a) how?
b) why?
c) buy me a helicopter and i'll be glad to.

I have flown through clouds countless times - they are wet.
everything at that altitude is wet, it's where all the water vapor condenses. this has already been explained.

start responding to my actual argument rather than these weak and obvious straw men.