It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship

  • 4284 Replies
  • 782853 Views
?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • +0/-0
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #750 on: May 21, 2015, 09:53:04 PM »
Wrong.

It is true that lab tests for Free Expansion on earth can only be done using a closed system; how else could they be done?

A near-limitless vacuum such as space cannot be re-created on earth.

But that Free Expansion will also apply to the PRESSURISED GAS inside a rocket's fuel tanks, when open to the VACUUM OF SPACE is utterly obvious even to a child.

Just what have you lot got against the laws of physics anyway?

Oh, & next one to call me a troll, or make ANY personal comment gets reported; I'm playing your game now.

BTW: Parsons; Hubbard; Crowley; Babalon Working; Moonchild... what WAS all that about again?
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

Rama Set

  • 6875
  • +1/-0
  • I am also an engineer
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #751 on: May 21, 2015, 10:16:38 PM »
Wrong.

It is true that lab tests for Free Expansion on earth can only be done using a closed system; how else could they be done?

A near-limitless vacuum such as space cannot be re-created on earth.

But that Free Expansion will also apply to the PRESSURISED GAS inside a rocket's fuel tanks, when open to the VACUUM OF SPACE is utterly obvious even to a child.

Just what have you lot got against the laws of physics anyway?

Oh, & next one to call me a troll, or make ANY personal comment gets reported; I'm playing your game now.

BTW: Parsons; Hubbard; Crowley; Babalon Working; Moonchild... what WAS all that about again?

Uh oh, sounds like someone is trying to apply "common sense" to the world again. Who wants to tell him that human intuition is a terrible approximation of how the world behaves?  Wait, did I just do it? 




Yup I did.
Aether is the  characteristic of action or inaction of charged  & noncharged particals.

*

Rayzor

  • 12195
  • +0/-6
  • Looking for Occam
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #752 on: May 21, 2015, 10:27:35 PM »
Wrong.

It is true that lab tests for Free Expansion on earth can only be done using a closed system; how else could they be done?

A near-limitless vacuum such as space cannot be re-created on earth.

But that Free Expansion will also apply to the PRESSURISED GAS inside a rocket's fuel tanks, when open to the VACUUM OF SPACE is utterly obvious even to a child.

Just what have you lot got against the laws of physics anyway?

Oh, & next one to call me a troll, or make ANY personal comment gets reported; I'm playing your game now.

BTW: Parsons; Hubbard; Crowley; Babalon Working; Moonchild... what WAS all that about again?

You prove again and again  don't understand even the most basic physics,  even when explained carefully with simple diagrams.

Who came up with this  notion in the first place?   Is this one of that  flat earth psycho Eric Dubay's  conspiracy theories?   Designed to  fool the terminally stupid and try to disprove space travel.

You probably don't believe is satellites either.    " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">



« Last Edit: May 21, 2015, 10:41:01 PM by Rayzor »
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

Rayzor

  • 12195
  • +0/-6
  • Looking for Occam
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #753 on: May 22, 2015, 01:24:11 AM »
Specially for Papa Legover.     Here is a video.    " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">   Start at 3:35 for description of how rockets work


Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #754 on: May 22, 2015, 02:06:02 AM »
Yes, markjo; let's suppose a thing that free expansion proves conclusively can not occur in a vacuum.

Like 'space'.
Free expansion only applies to an ideal gas (no mass) and a closed system.  Rocket exhaust does have mass and space is not a closed system.
What do you mean an ideal gas with no mass and a closed system?
All gas has mass. Anything that is something has mass, unless people want to play with magic.

Free expansion applies to anything that can freely expand, which is anything that encounters NO RESISTANCE to it's energy/force.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45131
  • +90/-135
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #755 on: May 22, 2015, 05:33:03 AM »
Yes, markjo; let's suppose a thing that free expansion proves conclusively can not occur in a vacuum.

Like 'space'.
Free expansion only applies to an ideal gas (no mass) and a closed system.  Rocket exhaust does have mass and space is not a closed system.
What do you mean an ideal gas with no mass and a closed system?
All gas has mass. Anything that is something has mass, unless people want to play with magic.

Free expansion applies to anything that can freely expand, which is anything that encounters NO RESISTANCE to it's energy/force.
The combustion chamber of a rocket engine is not an environment where gas is freely expanding.  Fuel and oxidizer are burned at such a high rate that the expanding gasses are forced out of the chamber faster than they would normally escape if the combustion was not occurring.  Think about a water hose.  If the water pressure is low, then the water just dribbles out on its own and its easy to handle.  Now if you add a high pressure pump, then the water is forced out quite vigorously and the hose becomes much harder to handle.  Same thing with gasses in a rocket engine: low pressure = free expansion; very high pressure = thrust.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Yendor

  • 1676
  • +0/-0
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #756 on: May 22, 2015, 06:14:22 AM »
I can't believe how people disagree if rockets work in space. The simple fact is, if rockets do work in space the same as they do in Earths atmosphere, then space is simply not a vacuum as everyone thinks it is. It is comprised of something else that acts as an atmosphere of some sort. It is that simple.
"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
                              George Orwell

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45131
  • +90/-135
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #757 on: May 22, 2015, 06:29:38 AM »
I can't believe how people disagree if rockets work in space. The simple fact is, if rockets do work in space the same as they do in Earths atmosphere, then space is simply not a vacuum as everyone thinks it is. It is comprised of something else that acts as an atmosphere of some sort. It is that simple.
Or, maybe it doesn't matter to the rocket if space is a vacuum or not.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • +0/-0
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #758 on: May 22, 2015, 07:57:54 AM »
Simply stating that I do not understand the laws of physics does not make it so.

Peer-pressure, ridicule & dumb repetition will not change that.

Nor will it make rockets work in a vacuum.

Rayzor: you repeatedly proved earlier that you are unable to comprehend a simple sentence in English; why, then, should anyone take your word that you are able to comprehend simple laws of science written in the same language?

If you still believe that you have any credibility left in this thread then you are mistaken; but please continue with your contributions, as they provide valuable evidence to the neutral reader of the comprehensive moral & intellectual bankruptcy of your position.

Markjo: Yes; the 'combustion chamber' - this is where the reductio ad absurdum inevitably ends whenever this matter is discussed.

& I shall leave you to fester there, as I have no desire to debate whether the molecules therein can transfer momentum to the chamber walls or not.

Because it is utterly irrelevant.

The fact is that if any rocket nozzle is open to a hard vacuum of near-infinite extent - as is found in space - then Free Expansion will occur & no Work will be done.

This is very simple, basic science; yet you refuse to comprehend it.

Why?

I do not care.

Now: Hubbard (scientology founder); Parsons (JPL founder); Crowley (Black Magician) - what could possibly connect them?
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

iWitness

  • 1173
  • +0/-0
  • If the earth is round then what is your problem?
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #759 on: May 22, 2015, 08:06:17 AM »
I can't believe how people disagree if rockets work in space. The simple fact is, if rockets do work in space the same as they do in Earths atmosphere, then space is simply not a vacuum as everyone thinks it is. It is comprised of something else that acts as an atmosphere of some sort. It is that simple.
Or, maybe it doesn't matter to the rocket if space is a vacuum or not.

But apparently it DOES matter if the air pressure is so low at 120,000+ feet that the rockets will not ignite.
Disclaimer: I am confused. Everything I say is speculative and not admissible in a court of law; however, I am neither insane nor a threat to myself or others. I am simply curious about everything in life and enjoy talking about crazy shit. Oh, & btw I like turtles.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #760 on: May 22, 2015, 08:08:09 AM »
The combustion chamber of a rocket engine is not an environment where gas is freely expanding.
The only place you could get free expansion, hypothetically, is in a true vacuum.
Anything close to that does not allow FREE expansion, although it does allow a much faster expansion of gases against much less resistance of reactive pressure.

Fuel and oxidizer are burned at such a high rate that the expanding gasses are forced out of the chamber faster than they would normally escape if the combustion was not occurring.
Yes they are forced out faster. I agree, but the issue is about what's happening inside the chamber.
You see, the gases in a sealed chamber would expand and explode if there was no outlet. Like a handgrenade with the pin pulled out. It blows apart and throws shrapnel in ALL directions because the expansion of gases had no seperate outlet.
Now imagine that hand grenade having the pin pulled out but also having a large hole in the top. There's your rocket.
It ignites and expands, except that the expanded gases have an outlet and you would see a spray of burning gases and probably a handgrenade flapping about around the place as it hits ATMOSPHERE and exapnds it due to it's ejected HOT gases expanding the compressed (colder) air around it which reacts in qual measures to compress back, causing the hand grenade in the opposite direction to its ejected flame.

This is how a rocket works, except much more thrust. When I say rocket, I mean much smaller rockets than the ones we are bullshitted with, as in fantasy space rockets.


  Think about a water hose.  If the water pressure is low, then the water just dribbles out on its own and its easy to handle.  Now if you add a high pressure pump, then the water is forced out quite vigorously and the hose becomes much harder to handle.
It becomes harder to handle because you are throwing much denser water at the atmosphere and the atmosphere is being compressed out of the way of the thrustng water. The atmosphere reacts in equal measures by squeezing back onto the water being ejected out of the hose and this is what pushes you back.
Think about it rationally.
If your hose was shooting out barbed wire water thn it would grip the inside of your hose and carry it forward not push it back against you.
Remember that water is moving forward pushed by the pump. The water in the hose cannot push back against you if it's being pushed forward.

The only way you can be pushed back is by the atmosphere friction gripping the more dense water to try and equalise the presasure put into it. Nature has to always equally react to an action in equal measures and it includes equalising pressures or attempting to.
As long as energy is applied against atmospheric pressure, then atmospheric pressure will always try to equalise against that energy by fricton squeezing it.

No different to a rocket burn, except for the actual means of expansion of atmosphere and energy applied.


  Same thing with gasses in a rocket engine:

As above.
low pressure = free expansion; very high pressure = thrust.
Low pressure = low expansion; very high pressure = very high expansion as long as it's done in atmospheric conditons.

In your space, low pressure = free expansion; very high pressure = free expansion for anything sealed in a container against a vacuum of any pressure and allowed to be released. It would all be FREE EXPANSION.

*

Mainframes

  • 2088
  • +0/-0
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #761 on: May 22, 2015, 09:19:25 AM »
You literally couldn't be more wrong.

In an atmosphere the expanding gas in the combustion chamber has to push against atmospheric pressure making it less efficient. In a vacuum the expanding gas is free to exit the combustion chamber to allow maximum efficiency.

The force pushing a rocket forward is the pressure of the combusting fuel and oxidiser in the combustion chamber, which is not in equilibrium due to the exit nozzle.
Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by ignorance or stupidity.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #762 on: May 22, 2015, 10:06:23 AM »
You literally couldn't be more wrong.

In an atmosphere the expanding gas in the combustion chamber has to push against atmospheric pressure making it less efficient. In a vacuum the expanding gas is free to exit the combustion chamber to allow maximum efficiency.

The force pushing a rocket forward is the pressure of the combusting fuel and oxidiser in the combustion chamber, which is not in equilibrium due to the exit nozzle.
Oh, I'm not wrong. I'm 100% correct. You, for some reason are just following protocol or being naive, whether deliberately or whatever.

You talk about something pushing against atmospheric pressure making it less efficient.
The whole purpose of the existence of anything is to push against resistance. No push against resistance means no life at all in any shape or form.

You just refuse to see it for whatever reason. All you're doing is aiding the lies and gaining nothing from it, because you can't call it knowledge when it's a complete lie unless you want to call your knowledge of fantasy, worthwhile.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45131
  • +90/-135
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #763 on: May 22, 2015, 10:19:53 AM »
The combustion chamber of a rocket engine is not an environment where gas is freely expanding.
The only place you could get free expansion, hypothetically, is in a true vacuum.
Anything close to that does not allow FREE expansion, although it does allow a much faster expansion of gases against much less resistance of reactive pressure.
Then I suppose that it's a good thing that outer space is not a true vacuum and this whole discussion is pointless.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #764 on: May 22, 2015, 10:29:31 AM »
The combustion chamber of a rocket engine is not an environment where gas is freely expanding.
The only place you could get free expansion, hypothetically, is in a true vacuum.
Anything close to that does not allow FREE expansion, although it does allow a much faster expansion of gases against much less resistance of reactive pressure.
Then I suppose that it's a good thing that outer space is not a true vacuum and this whole discussion is pointless.
The discussion is pointless for those who won't/refuse to understand that rockets will not work in space, whether it's a true vacuum or not by your accounts.

You seem to know that outer space is not a true vacuum for some reason. What reason would that be?

*

Quail

  • 132
  • +0/-0
  • I can't sea gull.
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #765 on: May 22, 2015, 11:25:56 AM »
The combustion chamber of a rocket engine is not an environment where gas is freely expanding.
The only place you could get free expansion, hypothetically, is in a true vacuum.
Anything close to that does not allow FREE expansion, although it does allow a much faster expansion of gases against much less resistance of reactive pressure.
Then I suppose that it's a good thing that outer space is not a true vacuum and this whole discussion is pointless.
The discussion is pointless for those who won't/refuse to understand that rockets will not work in space, whether it's a true vacuum or not by your accounts.

You seem to know that outer space is not a true vacuum for some reason. What reason would that be?

Please tell me how a rocket would produce thrust by pushing against air without just making it circulate and fly around.

*

legion

  • 1593
  • +0/-0
  • You are in my VR
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #766 on: May 22, 2015, 11:52:30 AM »
Here's what my logic tells me:

All of the mass (gas/liquid) in the system will move toward the opening. Nothing will push opposite the opening. The pressure inside the vessel will be reduced at a constant rate until all of the mass has exited.
What direction is the pressure remaining in the vessel pushing while the pressure is being reduced?  Is all of the pressure directed only at the opening, or is it pushing against the chamber equally in all directions, including the opening?

No motion will occur as no external force has been applied, as per Newton's first law.
Again, I'm not worried about motion at this point.  I'm only concerned with the balance of action/reaction forces.

The pressure will be the same at all points. If you start with 500psi, then release 100psi, you will now have a vessel pressurised to 400psi. You could have pressure gauges all around the vessel and they would all read the same (while the pressure is being released as well).
« Last Edit: May 22, 2015, 12:01:49 PM by legion »
"Indoctrination [...] is often distinguished from education by the fact that the indoctrinated person is expected not to question or critically examine the doctrine they have learned".

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • +0/-0
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #767 on: May 22, 2015, 12:12:31 PM »
Somehow, a shrinking balloon 'proves' space travel; this is the depths to which the NASA-cultists are prepared to sink.

AGAIN, I ASK: WHAT WERE L RON HUBBARD, FOUNDER OF SCIENTOLOGY, JACK PARSONS, FOUNDER OF JPL, & ALEISTER CROWLEY, RENOWNED BLACK MAGICIAN, ALL DOING TOGETHER?

WHAT WAS THE 'BABALON WORKING'? WHAT WAS THE 'MOONCHILD' THEY TRIED TO CREATE?


Really; grow up, cultists.
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

Quail

  • 132
  • +0/-0
  • I can't sea gull.
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #768 on: May 22, 2015, 12:32:53 PM »
Somehow, a shrinking balloon 'proves' space travel; this is the depths to which the NASA-cultists are prepared to sink.

AGAIN, I ASK: WHAT WERE L RON HUBBARD, FOUNDER OF SCIENTOLOGY, JACK PARSONS, FOUNDER OF JPL, & ALEISTER CROWLEY, RENOWNED BLACK MAGICIAN, ALL DOING TOGETHER?

WHAT WAS THE 'BABALON WORKING'? WHAT WAS THE 'MOONCHILD' THEY TRIED TO CREATE?


Really; grow up, cultists.

I have no idea what you are talking about.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • +0/-0
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #769 on: May 22, 2015, 12:36:12 PM »
Well then, take your hands off your ears, open your eyes & use google like everybody else has, slowpoke...

Parsons, Hubbard & Crowley: all INVOKING things... What could that have been about?
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

Quail

  • 132
  • +0/-0
  • I can't sea gull.
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #770 on: May 22, 2015, 12:43:17 PM »
Well then, take your hands off your ears, open your eyes & use google like everybody else has, slowpoke...

Parsons, Hubbard & Crowley: all INVOKING things... What could that have been about?

Do you realizes that anyone can post something on the internet, making it a horrible source of information? I never heared of any of the names you are talking about, because I simply don't care about some "cult" which I supposedly belong to.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45131
  • +90/-135
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #771 on: May 22, 2015, 12:45:23 PM »
The combustion chamber of a rocket engine is not an environment where gas is freely expanding.
The only place you could get free expansion, hypothetically, is in a true vacuum.
Anything close to that does not allow FREE expansion, although it does allow a much faster expansion of gases against much less resistance of reactive pressure.
Then I suppose that it's a good thing that outer space is not a true vacuum and this whole discussion is pointless.
The discussion is pointless for those who won't/refuse to understand that rockets will not work in space, whether it's a true vacuum or not by your accounts.

You seem to know that outer space is not a true vacuum for some reason. What reason would that be?
Perhaps because the conspiracy has launched enough probes into space to study the how much of what gasses are in outer space.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45131
  • +90/-135
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #772 on: May 22, 2015, 12:49:23 PM »
Here's what my logic tells me:

All of the mass (gas/liquid) in the system will move toward the opening. Nothing will push opposite the opening. The pressure inside the vessel will be reduced at a constant rate until all of the mass has exited.
What direction is the pressure remaining in the vessel pushing while the pressure is being reduced?  Is all of the pressure directed only at the opening, or is it pushing against the chamber equally in all directions, including the opening?

No motion will occur as no external force has been applied, as per Newton's first law.
Again, I'm not worried about motion at this point.  I'm only concerned with the balance of action/reaction forces.

The pressure will be the same at all points. If you start with 500psi, then release 100psi, you will now have a vessel pressurised to 400psi. You could have pressure gauges all around the vessel and they would all read the same (while the pressure is being released as well).
Yes, the pressure would be equal all around the vessel, except for the one square inch hole.  Since there is nothing there to oppose the pressure within the vessel, the forces are unbalanced resulting in a net force on the surface opposite the opening.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • +0/-0
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #773 on: May 22, 2015, 12:55:16 PM »
Markjo: combustion chamber LOL!

Also; so there IS a conspiracy?

Thanks for admitting that.

In fact, what 'the conspiracy' has done is to fire enough rockets upwards to know that they'll fall back down as soon as the atmosphere is too thin to support thrust, then thought 'meh; so what?' & given the go-ahead to con-men & cultists to rip-off feeble-minded sci-fi fans with s.f.x. nonsense.

It's not hard to see.
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • +0/-0
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #774 on: May 22, 2015, 12:57:46 PM »
& quail: just lol.

Really.

lol.
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

JRoweSkeptic

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 5407
  • +0/-0
  • DET Developer
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #775 on: May 22, 2015, 01:14:28 PM »
papa legba, you are a troll. end of. you are pathetic. just fuck off already, no one is interested in a word you have to say, and you dragging out this bs thread for so long is just excruciating. no one gives a fuck what you are to stay, you are just a sad litle individual. even as a troll, just repeating yourself for over a dozen pages is just the product of a sick little mind.
you are pathetic.

some of us actually care about advancing flat earth theory. you however are just a grade a buffooon. you are dull, tedious, utterly uninteresting, and moronic. it is not often i agree with round earthers, but on this case it is clear.

you are a troll. you are a waste of time and of aether (or air as the scientifically illiterate call it). just leave. come back when you're remotely able to engage your brain, or at least when you're somewhat interesting.

you're pathetic. end of.
http://fet.wikia.com
dualearththeory.proboards.com/
On the sister site if you want to talk.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • +0/-0
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #776 on: May 22, 2015, 01:20:28 PM »
LOL!

I would report you for personal abuse, Jrowe, but your comments are just too funny & I want em to stand.

As evidence, like...

Cos you lot really do have NOTHING, do you?

Not.

A.

Sausage.

& you hate it!

Now; explain again how the combustion chamber of a choked-flow nozzle works...

In a vacuum!

ROFLCOPTER!!!!!
« Last Edit: May 22, 2015, 01:22:32 PM by Papa Legba »
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

JRoweSkeptic

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 5407
  • +0/-0
  • DET Developer
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #777 on: May 22, 2015, 01:21:46 PM »
LOL!

I would report you for personal abuse, Jrowe, but your comments are just too funny & I want em to stand.

As evidence, like...

Cos you lot really do have NOTHING, do you?

Not.

A.

Sausage.

& you hate it!

Now; explain again how the combustion chamber of a choked-flow nozzle works...

ROFLCOPTER!!!!!

why? space travel is faked, that's a fact, but your arguments are grade a bullshit. stop wasting everybody's time you moronic waste of space.
http://fet.wikia.com
dualearththeory.proboards.com/
On the sister site if you want to talk.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • +0/-0
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #778 on: May 22, 2015, 01:26:32 PM »
Whatever; when you have anything to add beyond personal abuse then get back to me...

Til then - buh-bye!!!

P.s. what do YOU think Hubbard, Parsons & Crowley were doing, INVOKING things?

Just for laughs, like...
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

JRoweSkeptic

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 5407
  • +0/-0
  • DET Developer
Re: It's 2015 and you aren't even close to owning a Spaceship
« Reply #779 on: May 22, 2015, 01:30:48 PM »
Whatever; when you have anything to add beyond personal abuse then get back to me...

Til then - buh-bye!!!

P.s. what do YOU think Hubbard, Parsons & Crowley were doing, INVOKING things?

Just for laughs, like...

no one gives a fuck what you think or what you have to say. just piss off already.

you are tedious. dull. frustrating. you are nothing except some sad pathetic idiot with nothing to do except type what you know is shit into a forum you care nothing about, and it's laughable due to how much time you've spent here. make you feel good, huh? typing out insults and wasting time for something you clearly care nothing about. must be the only place you can act tough. you have to be a real weakling in real life.

you do nothing except repeat yourself. people get bored of you, you find some new shit, then you repeat that. you're just a loser. so i really don't give a fuck what you're invoking or whatever it is that means you've decided to waste hours of your own time here. i have no desire to answer you, and no desire to stop insulting you, because this is precisely what you deserve.

you are a moron. a pathetic, sad little moron.

go fuck yourself.
http://fet.wikia.com
dualearththeory.proboards.com/
On the sister site if you want to talk.