The proposition: 'IF YOU HAVE NOT BEEN TO SPACE, THEN YOU CANNOT SAY WITH ANY CERTAINTY WHAT IT IS LIKE & THEREFORE YOUR WORD ON THE SUBJECT IS ULTIMATELY WORTHLESS' is not an example of 'fallacious reasoning'; it is a statement of the bleeding obvious.
One that the space-Cultists here have a very hard time accepting, it seems...
Further; I do not accept that I have been making you 'look bad as a group'; I have been making the fools among you look even more foolish & the humourless among you look even more humourless.
Everybody else has been having a good old laugh.
I remind you that I was not the first to use crude language or base insults on this thread; I have merely given as good as I received, simply done in a more inventive & eloquent manner.
The space-Cultists sowed the wind; they cannot then complain when they reap the whirlwind.
As for my using semantic trickery, again, this was a weapon first used against my simple proposition by the Cultists; yet, again, they complain when I turn it round, sharpen it & use it against them.
Are you starting to see a pattern here?
Not once have I called the mods, even when ganged up on, abused & told to eat 'fesces' by mobs of obvious sock-puppets; yet the Cultists appear to call the mods on my every post.
'Appeal to authority' much?
Attempted censorship much?
So: ban me if you wish; it matters not to me, for I have already won this 'debate'. The depths which the Cultists have had to plumb in order to try & stifle my voice is as damning a testimony as I could wish for.
Because, of course, the undeniable Truth is that not a single one of them has actually been to space.
& their word on the subject has no more validity than that of a new-born child.