* That Australia is the same as space (repeatedly & vehemently).
Not one person has said this. In fact, I remember directly saying this is not the case multiple times.
All we're saying is that your logic applies to Australia as well as space. You have also been directly asked for the reason why it does not. We're still waiting on an answer to that.
Australia is different to space. Great, good, got that, always had that. So? It is a place you have not personally been. That is the only trait of space you've brought up: if you're using that to conclude space cannot be reached, you must be concluding the same of Australia.
Seriously, try to answer the question for once. Why does your logic not apply here? What, specifically, is the trait of Australia that exempts it?