The real conspiracy and how flat earthers are contributing to it

I've hit a target from 1,000 yards away with a pistol. It was a Smith & Wesson M&P.

What caliber?

Unsurprisingly, I didn't have to take into account the Coriolis effect. Wonder why that is?

Depends on the direction you were shooting.

I once hit a target 10,535 km away with an ICMB.

Fuck yeah!

I bet you can taste the freedum!

I once hit a target 10,535 km away with an ICMB.

Fuck yeah!

I bet you can taste the freedum!

Tell Vauxhall how you had to compensate for the Coriolis effect (asuming you were not shooting a target directly north or south of you).

It's called Universal Acceleration

Evidence for this?

Quote from: Vauxhall on April 27, 2015, 11:42:21 AM

It's called Universal Acceleration

Evidence for this?

Evidence for this?

It's the same damn thing, yet it's backed by round Earth scientists. Why are you willingly to believe this mumbo-jumbo theoretical model, yet completely dismiss Universal Acceleration? It seems like you are picking and choosing what you believe, especially when you consider that UA is testable on Earth and the "Accelerating universe" theory is simply not testable at all. I guess you're just willing to believe anything someone with a degree says as indisputable fact. Of course, you'll believe things like dark matter and dark energy as well, so I'm not very surprised.

Quote from: triune truther on May 21, 2015, 08:42:37 AM

Quote from: Vauxhall on April 27, 2015, 11:42:21 AM

It's called Universal Acceleration

Evidence for this?

Evidence for this?

It's the same damn thing, yet it's backed by round Earth scientists. Why are you willingly to believe this mumbo-jumbo theoretical model, yet completely dismiss Universal Acceleration? It seems like you are picking and choosing what you believe, especially when you consider that UA is testable on Earth and the "Accelerating universe" theory is simply not testable at all. I guess you're just willing to believe anything someone with a degree says as indisputable fact. Of course, you'll believe things like dark matter and dark energy as well, so I'm not very surprised.

The difference between round a Earth universal expansion and flat Earth universal accekeration is that in flat Earth UA everything accelerates except things that fall like you, me, and everything else on the surface of the Earth.

What prevents the force which supposedly accelerated the Earth from accelerating you and me?  You could say that the Earth blocks it which would make sense but things in the sky like the Sun, Moon, planets, and stars don't fall which means that they would have to be accelerated up too even though you believe they are above the Earth.  Round Earth universal expansion doesn't break the Newtonian laws of physics and it simply states that everything is accelerating the same amount regardless of what it is which is exactaly what gravity does.  What makes things on the surface of the Earth so special in FET?

What prevents the force which supposedly accelerated the Earth from accelerating you and me?  You could say that the Earth blocks it which would make sense but things in the sky like the Sun, Moon, planets, and stars don't fall which means that they would have to be accelerated up too even though you believe they are above the Earth.  Round Earth universal expansion doesn't break the Newtonian laws of physics and it simply states that everything is accelerating the same amount regardless of what it is which is exactaly what gravity does.  What makes things on the surface of the Earth so special in FET?

If you have been paying attention to my posts then you'd know that this is a stupid question. The Aetheric Wind model answers all of your questions.



Aether is blocked by the Earth, which aether then pushes upwards. This aether escapes around the rim continent to create an aetheric wall. Due to aether's unique nature, the slipstreams converge into each other above the Earth, which creates the whirlpool that the Sun and Moon are trapped in, which causes their rotation.

So there's really nothing 'special' about anything on or above the Earth.

Quote from: mikeman7918 on May 25, 2015, 04:32:47 PM

What prevents the force which supposedly accelerated the Earth from accelerating you and me?  You could say that the Earth blocks it which would make sense but things in the sky like the Sun, Moon, planets, and stars don't fall which means that they would have to be accelerated up too even though you believe they are above the Earth.  Round Earth universal expansion doesn't break the Newtonian laws of physics and it simply states that everything is accelerating the same amount regardless of what it is which is exactaly what gravity does.  What makes things on the surface of the Earth so special in FET?

If you have been paying attention to my posts then you'd know that this is a stupid question. The Aetheric Wind model answers all of your questions.



Aether is blocked by the Earth, which aether then pushes upwards. This aether escapes around the rim continent to create an aetheric wall. Due to aether's unique nature, the slipstreams converge into each other above the Earth, which creates the whirlpool that the Sun and Moon are trapped in, which causes their rotation.

So there's really nothing 'special' about anything on or above the Earth.

How can aether be solid enough to make a wall and liquid enough to flow?  Obvious contradiction is obvious.

Aether is not a liquid or a solid.

Aether is not a liquid or a solid.

Then what is it, a gas?  Plasma?  What?

http://wiki.tfes.org/Aether

If the aether is made of Hydrogen and Helium then why doesn't it burn when it contacts the oxygen rich air and get's hot enough?  The aether should be explosive.

That's only the first probelem that immediately comes to mind with that explenation, other problems are thi da like how the heck it would push the world.

It's also worth mentioning that like every other flat earth model you have no explenation for sunsets.

It is made of a mixture of Hydrogen (H) and Helium (He). Aether was formed before the Big Bang, when all matter and energy in the Universe was crushed together in the same particle with near infinite heat and pressure. It is of a state of matter unreachable by man. It, like gas, is very fluid, and is so spread out that not even London Dispersal Forces (van der Waals Forces) affect it. As such, it retains energy indefinitely. It is also what warms the Earth and causes the lava under the crust.

If it is made up of a mixture of gasses effected by van der waals forces, how can it not be effected by van der waals forces?
It would make more sence without the first sentence.
Hydrogen and Helium where made after the Big Bang.
also - citation needed

It's also mentioning that it's impossible to be "near infinity".  A number is either infinity or it isn't.  It can't be near infinitely, 10^10000000000 is just as far from infinity as 1.

It's also mentioning that it's impossible to be "near infinity".  A number is either infinity or it isn't.  It can't be near infinitely, 10^10000000000 is just as far from infinity as 1.

Have you looked up Grahams number? You should its fun.
And Grahams number is puny next to infinity.

I just commented to say something about grahams number, seriously go have a look" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">