Evidence trumps logic. We have evidence, you don't.
if you need to bypass logic to use your evidence, it is not evidence: and i have plenty of evidence, you're just repeatedly ignoring it. pathetic, really.
Regardless, you have not shown that evolution absolutely constrains technology, so you are also making a probability argument: evolution probably constrains technological development.
false. read again.
The problem is that we have evidence that space travel has happened
debunked as a consequence. are you still struggling with this?
if it is impossible to go to space, then so-called space travel is faked. this is a fact. what is wrong with you?!
we have given you many examples of feats achieved by technology and not by evolution
look at that, ignoring the fact i've responded to each of those examples in turn before in this thread, and happily using refuted arguments to exhaust rather than discuss. learn to read.
So I will continue asking what is fundamentally different between speed of flight and altitude that make supersonic flight possible eventhough evolution hasn't developed it yet?
hello again bj. i linked you spefically to a post which directly rebuts your bs and you don't even acknowledge it. tell me, why shoudl i talk to you when you never read a word i say?
If the universe is logical, what are its axioms and what are its rules of inference?
uh, logic? you know logic is a set of axioms and rules of inference, right? are you kidding me?
still waiting for someone to address the premises with more than an asserted "you're wrong!" even if your bs examples (shredded time and time again) were right, that would imply a fault in my reasoning. yet again, an argument everyone has ignored to ramble on with straw men:
given that evolution has far better resources and far more time to develop capabilities than humans