You're begging me to hate you. I normally take it easy on newbies, but forget that.
1. EVIDENCE, now. Otherwise false instantly, no argument.
2. I fail to see any proof or in fact any disproving
3. If it were that easy don't you think that we would've thought that? We aren't moving fast enough for the celestial bodies to appear to spin around. They do that at the poles, though.
4. Yes, they're going to do something they already did, spend more money that they could be investing in new things.
5. Yes, people can be in space with space suits. Magic, eh?
6. I do not care enough about your site to waste the bandwidth.
7. And? Who cares. Just because a paper is published is not magically changing reality.
8. Yes, I agree. There is no hell. But there is evidence to RE, and stupid ad hoc, idiotic, notions is all FE has.
I hope this crushed you, I'm happy to help people back to their senses.
Yeah, crushed indeed. The funny thing is you said, "But there is evidence to RE, and stupid ad hoc, idiotic, notions is all FE has." So, let me see if any of your points have a crushing effect.
1. You are kidding right? My video shows a)the lie of ISS, fast forwarding clearly seen meaning not traveling near 17,000 mph b)tons of faked photos all analyzed by a professional. The shadow on the ceiling? The light bulb Sun? The altered photos? The props being moved?
VERDICT: RE CLEARLY CRUSHED BY YOUR BELIEF IN NASA - you can't win this one, too much proof. Stop trying to call clear hoaxing science please, you look silly.
2. You fail to see any proof? I have been looking into this far too long to go away that easy. I feel a bet coming. Are you going to take the side of Lady liberty standing in the middle of the two cities holding up a bulge of water? Are you going to say water can have a bulge? It can curve? Now, do you need crayons for your first day in kindergarten?
VERDICT: ONLY A FOOL WOULD CLAIM WATER CAN BEND. Picture water in the shape of the letter n... " n " Is this possible? Of course not. It would spill and become ___ which is ummm, flat. That's FE 2 RE 0
3. I don't even understand your explanation of three. Go watch a "star timelapse" see the circles the stars make? Okay great. That is because we are spinning right Mr. Hates Me? Okay so now go outside and point your camera in the sky and spin in a circle, go inside and watch your movie, now cry yourself to sleep because
VERDICT: Duhhhh, the stars cannot make circles from a spinning Earth. FE 3 RE 0
4. Oh they don't like to do things they already have done huh. These are your true responses? If they would have gone back maybe they would have discovered water on the moon instead of letting a rover find it outta India. Buzz was too busy playing masonic loincloth I guess to notice the water! But you are right, NASA spends money wisely like the ISS taking the same photos satellites take. But that 150 billion has served humanity well... have you seen them flip a microphone? It spins! I swear! And they are growing vegetables up there.
VERDICT: NASA CAN'T GO TO THE MOON, so FE 4 RE 0
5. Oh now there is a new member of Apollo 11 outside the ship running away and you explain this with "yes, people can be in space with space suits. Magic, eh?" Good one. That isn't weird at all. It'd be like you finding a video of Jesus being raised to heaven by a crane and a Christian explaining it with, well yeah, cranes can lift people, magic huh?
VERDICT: Dumbest response yet award and FE 5 RE -1
6. Cool, default win.
VERDICT: Too lazy to attempt to explain 1000 inconsistencies so FE 6 RE-2
7. So, you intellectuals can challenge me daily with this, "Where is your degree" "Where is your peer reviewed paper?" but when I do the same, now peer reviewed papers don't mean stuff is true? Ummm, ad hoc, see definition. Please
VERDICT: Still out- it is only a theory - no pints awarded FE 6 RE -2
8. Has been summed up above, no point needed
VERDICT: Land slide win for FE....
Now, you must hate me so much more because THAT is how you crush!