Map

Would the following  be considered a proper "Flat Earth Question" ?
Question::
How many times does a "Round Earther" have to ask a "Flat Earther" a question before the "Flat Earther" answers a question from a "Round Earther"?

Q1:  Are any flat earthers currently working on the production of an "official" flat earth map?  If so, who are they?
Q2:  What is the expected time frame for the delivery of the map?  Days?  Weeks?  Or if longer, by how much?

iWitness is a busy man, with a lot of research and experimentation to complete in the short time we are all on this Earth.  Perhaps you should try to PM him with your questions.  I am sure you will get a prompt response.

Quote from: Googleotomy on April 01, 2015, 08:35:29 PM

Would the following  be considered a proper "Flat Earth Question" ?
Question::
How many times does a "Round Earther" have to ask a "Flat Earther" a question before the "Flat Earther" answers a question from a "Round Earther"?

It's becoming increasingly a waste of time asking questions of flat earthers on this alleged Q&A forum.  Any serious questions are invariably ignored by the majority of flat earthers—even by the moderators. It's actually becoming an information black hole [sic].

A week ago, I asked the following perfectly legitimate questions relating to flat earth and round earth mapping distance discrepancies:

Q1:  Would any flat earther be prepared to dispute the distances between major cities that I recorded (travelling around Australia)?
Q2:  What alternative FE data would they utilise to either prove or disprove my figures?
Q3:  If any FEs disagree with my figures, what cause(s) could they suggest for my alleged errors of measurement?

Today jroa—instead of answering my earlier questions directed to him...

Quote

Q1:  Are any flat earthers currently working on the production of an "official" flat earth map?  If so, who are they?
Q2:  What is the expected time frame for the delivery of the map?  Days?  Weeks?  Or if longer, by how much?

... is now apparently suggesting we PM flat earthers for some answers.

—Is this really the best the flat earthers can do on their own Q&A forum?

I have taken the suggestion and PM'd iWitness to see if I will get any answers to my questions.

Quote from: Googleotomy on April 03, 2015, 04:30:35 PM

I have taken the suggestion and PM'd iWitness to see if I will get any answers to my questions.

I note that iWitness hasn't been active on these forums since 24 March 2015 at 06:43:24 PM.

Maybe we've finally got rid of him and his irrelevant bible-bashing nonsense..... I live in hope.   

Meanwhile, we await the return of iWitness. A few answers to some questions, please.

Just found this map:



It's one of the most complete world maps I have found that shows most of Antarctica around the Flat Earth. Only problems I see with this map is the size of the Americas are much too big, and the main world mass should be larger and more centered.

But other than that, this is a great FLAT EARTH map.

Just found this map:



It's one of the most complete world maps I have found that shows most of Antarctica around the Flat Earth. Only problems I see with this map is the size of the Americas are much too big, and the main world mass should be larger and more centered.

But other than that, this is a great FLAT EARTH map.

Quote from: iWitness on April 12, 2015, 11:24:10 AM

Just found this map:



It's one of the most complete world maps I have found that shows most of Antarctica around the Flat Earth. Only problems I see with this map is the size of the Americas are much too big, and the main world mass should be larger and more centered.

But other than that, this is a great FLAT EARTH map.

Aside from the fact that Australia is part of antarctica, which it is demonstrably not.
And there is no antarctica on the edges of the map in the pacific ocean.

Other than that, yeah. It is a great Flat earth map. Pat yourself on the back.

Quote from: Scroto Gaggins on April 12, 2015, 10:14:28 PM

Quote from: iWitness on April 12, 2015, 11:24:10 AM

Just found this map:



It's one of the most complete world maps I have found that shows most of Antarctica around the Flat Earth. Only problems I see with this map is the size of the Americas are much too big, and the main world mass should be larger and more centered.

But other than that, this is a great FLAT EARTH map.

Aside from the fact that Australia is part of antarctica, which it is demonstrably not.
And there is no antarctica on the edges of the map in the pacific ocean.

Other than that, yeah. It is a great Flat earth map. Pat yourself on the back.

Such "Flat earth maps" were used for centuries to circumnavigate the globe! Isn't that marvelous? 

Quote from: iWitness on April 12, 2015, 11:24:10 AM

Just found this map:



It's one of the most complete world maps I have found that shows most of Antarctica around the Flat Earth. Only problems I see with this map is the size of the Americas are much too big, and the main world mass should be larger and more centered.

But other than that, this is a great FLAT EARTH map.

Aside from the fact that Australia is part of antarctica, which it is demonstrably not.
And there is no antarctica on the edges of the map in the pacific ocean.

Other than that, yeah. It is a great Flat earth map. Pat yourself on the back.

Don't even want to comment on the other maps.

Interesting how on this old map, Russia and Alaska both connect to Antarctica, and NOT the Bering straight. Just what I suspected, that traveling from Russia to Alaska over the Bering straight is IMPOSSIBLE. Which is why there will never be a land bridge or superhighway built.

What happened to the giant Antarctic landmass in the north that somehow disappeared from modern maps?

Quote from: Scroto Gaggins on April 12, 2015, 10:14:28 PM

Quote from: iWitness on April 12, 2015, 11:24:10 AM

What are you on about? Antarctica is in the south.

Just found this map:

Just found this map:



It's one of the most complete world maps I have found that shows most of Antarctica around the Flat Earth. Only problems I see with this map is the size of the Americas are much too big, and the main world mass should be larger and more centered.

But other than that, this is a great FLAT EARTH map.

Quote from: iWitness on April 12, 2015, 11:24:10 AM

Just found this map:

LOL... this is what's called, I believe, a "home goal".

This map is actually a Mercator projection of the spherical planet.  It's Latin title is Nova et Aucta Orbis Terrae Descriptio ad Usum Navigantium Emendate Accommodata which means "new and more complete representation of the terrestrial globe properly adapted for use in navigation".

We round earthers all thank you iWitness for (inadvertently?) helping to support our side of the debate.  Well done!  10/10.     

Quote from: ausGeoff on April 13, 2015, 11:27:11 AM

Quote from: iWitness on April 12, 2015, 11:24:10 AM

Just found this map:

LOL... this is what's called, I believe, a "home goal".

This map is actually a Mercator projection of the spherical planet.  It's Latin title is Nova et Aucta Orbis Terrae Descriptio ad Usum Navigantium Emendate Accommodata which means "new and more complete representation of the terrestrial globe properly adapted for use in navigation".

We round earthers all thank you iWitness for (inadvertently?) helping to support our side of the debate.  Well done!  10/10.     

Interesting however that navigation works when we project the round map to the square. But the original belief was flat. So basically, we had the flat earth, along comes your savior Copernicus Christ and his sun 3,000,000 miles away and the Earth goes Globetrotter followed by the need to project it back to a square for navigation. It appears to me their was a step in the middle that was not needed, without basis, without proof, and useless to everyone but intellectuals who will cry when their bubble pops.

Look the facts are simple....


Who is usually telling the truth?  Liars or people who tell the truth?  I know, it is a tough question.


So NASA lies, check. Governments lie, check. The people who shrunk the south and expanded the north placing the equator 75% down the map lie, check. Okay and they all believe what?  Oh magical ball Earth? 


Okay and what lies do flat Earth people tell? (Oh yeah, religion....  fuck I had something)


Way to go Christians... now the real shape of the world is right there with virgin births. 

Interesting however that navigation works when we project the round map to the square. But the original belief was flat. So basically, we had the flat earth, along comes your savior Copernicus Christ and his sun 3,000,000 miles away and the Earth goes Globetrotter followed by the need to project it back to a square for navigation. It appears to me their was a step in the middle that was not needed, without basis, without proof, and useless to everyone but intellectuals who will cry when their bubble pops.

Quote from: iWitness on April 12, 2015, 11:24:10 AM

Just found this map:

LOL... this is what's called, I believe, a "home goal".

This map is actually a Mercator projection of the spherical planet.  It's Latin title is Nova et Aucta Orbis Terrae Descriptio ad Usum Navigantium Emendate Accommodata which means "new and more complete representation of the terrestrial globe properly adapted for use in navigation".

We round earthers all thank you iWitness for (inadvertently?) helping to support our side of the debate.  Well done!  10/10.     

Interesting however that navigation works when we project the round map to the square.

But the original belief was flat.

So basically, we had the flat earth, along comes your savior Copernicus Christ and his sun 3,000,000 miles away and the Earth goes Globetrotter followed by the need to project it back to a square for navigation. It appears to me their was a step in the middle that was not needed, without basis, without proof, and useless to everyone but intellectuals who will cry when their bubble pops.

The Map clearly shows Antarctica going all the way around the world, and also the Bering straight does not exist.

You really think all the landmasses would fit on this:

It is commonly considered to have been a windmill built in the mid-17th century. However, the tower has received attention due to speculation that it is actually several centuries older and would then represent evidence of pre-Columbian trans-oceanic contact.

A letter group resembling the tetragrammaton YHWH, or "Yahweh," makes three appearances. The stone is controversial in that some claim the inscription is Pre-Columbian, and therefore proof of early Semitic contact with the Americas.[3]

While this map is not 100% perfect, it is still 100x better than what they have come up with since then. It's quite obvious from ancient sea expeditions and mapping, that Antarctica is a ring of ice around a flat earth with several islands in between. But for whatever reason, they have decided to lie about it.

It makes sense that the Americas is seriously distorted in size compared to Eurasia because this was new territory to these explorers. It truly appears as if the "Dark Ages" was a time when knowledge was hidden and suppressed because I'm sure there have been more accurate maps in ancient times.