the term is technobabble. for yet another example of that, 'cytoskeleton'.
It would be technobabble if my words had no meaning and are there just to sound impressive. Cytoskeleton is not technobabble as it is a real thing that totally makes sense in my sentence.
I'm trying to make this as simple as possible. It's not my problem if big words scare you.
you seem to be under the impression that we are surrounded by oxygen: those are the only grounds under which your arguments make sense.
You obviously don't understand my point. Lets see if I can simplify it.
Certain microbes can't stand oxygen. When exposed to the air, they die in the same way that they would die if exposed to oxygen. Coincidence?
there could well be a common cause between how well it copes with the normal, aetheric heat conduction, and the hydrogen peroxide case you suppose: the pressure of the aether inside it is the problem.
It's clear to all that you are just spouting random words.
i never claimed the aether has political opinions, i suggest you try to read.
Oh, so it dislikes Obama as a person? That's not ridiculous at all.
it's technobabble when you needlessly include technical terms to make yourself seem clever.
oxygen kills in the same way. it might be hyperconduction that kills them: oxygen is the best way to enhance the breathing process (which imparts heat, which we can tell from observation), despite the fact its a gas. gases, like liquids and solids, are thick, however, so they slow and prevent movement, and so heat conduction.
in pure aether, there's nothing to slow it down: and in the same way, oxygen encourages the process.
the aether dislikes specific traits. it is attracted to itself, i suspect it would also be attracted to or repelled by certain thoughts and impulses. obama is not the only one it dislikes, he is just a high profile example of someone who possesses those negative thoughts.
it is not political, i have heard similar dislike expressed towards republicans.