« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 [17] 18 19   Go Down

The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium

  • 547 Replies
  • 271111 Views
?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5039
  • Magic specialist
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #480 on: October 29, 2010, 10:15:17 AM »
Quote from: Hessy on October 29, 2010, 09:31:03 AM
Don't you think someone would notice ~~$15.7 million going to the top three NASA guys that should've gone to the actual space program?  That means not only would those three need to be involved (as well as countless others, really) but the people who do their finances.

Since no one can show that a conspiracy would not cost more than an actual space program, this is a moot point.
Logged
Quote from: Thork on April 02, 2012, 01:56:05 AM
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 17933
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #481 on: October 29, 2010, 03:17:13 PM »
Quote from: General Disarray on October 29, 2010, 10:15:17 AM
Quote from: Hessy on October 29, 2010, 09:31:03 AM
Don't you think someone would notice ~~$15.7 million going to the top three NASA guys that should've gone to the actual space program?  That means not only would those three need to be involved (as well as countless others, really) but the people who do their finances.

Since no one can show that a conspiracy would not cost more than an actual space program, this is a moot point.

So it costs more to pretend to go into space than to actually go into space?  ???
Logged
?

wecl0me12

  • 142
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #482 on: October 29, 2010, 03:31:50 PM »
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_astronauts_by_name
548 astronauts, 548,000,000 USD/year, and many more scientists. Now with space tourism, that is going to increase much more. a real spaceflight, is a 1 time cost of $1.7 billion.  (source:
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/kennedy/about/information/shuttle_faq.html#1 )
in just 4 years, a real spaceflight would cost less.

$548 million is just for the astronauts, faking Australia, guarding the ice wall, sky mirrors, programs to fake images, etc. all cost money.

so yes, it does cost more to fake a space flight than to actually have one.
Logged
round earther
Quote from:  topic#19384
Gravity as a force does not exist
Quote from: FAQ
Q: Why does g vary with altitude if the Earth simply accelerates up?

A: The celestial bodies have a slight gravitational pull.
*

Ski

  • Planar Moderator
  • 8738
  • Homines, dum docent, dispenguin.
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #483 on: October 29, 2010, 03:46:32 PM »
Quote from: wecl0me12 on October 29, 2010, 03:31:50 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_astronauts_by_name
548 astronauts, 548,000,000 USD/year, and many more scientists. Now with space tourism, that is going to increase much more. a real spaceflight, is a 1 time cost of $1.7 billion.  

I'm not sure how you arrived at your figure of a million a year. Seems arbitrary.


Quote
$548 million is just for the astronauts, faking Australia, guarding the ice wall, sky mirrors, programs to fake images, etc. all cost money.

I don't think you'll find anyone who believes conspirators do anything on your list other than "programs to fake images".
Logged
"Never think you can turn over any old falsehood without a terrible squirming of the horrid little population that dwells under it." -O.W. Holmes "Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne.."
?

wecl0me12

  • 142
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #484 on: October 29, 2010, 04:13:10 PM »
Quote from: Ski on October 29, 2010, 03:46:32 PM
Quote from: wecl0me12 on October 29, 2010, 03:31:50 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_astronauts_by_name
548 astronauts, 548,000,000 USD/year, and many more scientists. Now with space tourism, that is going to increase much more. a real spaceflight, is a 1 time cost of $1.7 billion.  

I'm not sure how you arrived at your figure of a million a year. Seems arbitrary.


Quote
$548 million is just for the astronauts, faking Australia, guarding the ice wall, sky mirrors, programs to fake images, etc. all cost money.

I don't think you'll find anyone who believes conspirators do anything on your list other than "programs to fake images".

1. OP: Basically, I'm going to assume that every single person on my list wants to get paid so that they won't talk about the conspiracy. They're going to want a lot of it, too, most likely. Probably enough so that they won't have to work for the rest of their lives? Well, how's about something like one million dollars per year, plus one million in advance. That's far better than most jobs can fetch, and all they have to do is shut up. Minus the top five or so, since they are the runners of the organization.

2.
ice wall guards
FAQ:

Q: "Why has no one taken a photo of the Earth that proves it is flat?"

A: Only those connected to the Conspiracy have access to heights from which the shape of the Earth can be discerned.  Also, nobody has been to the edge of the Earth and lived; conditions on the Ice Wall get increasingly treacherous the further you get out, and navigation methods become unreliable that far south.  It is also possible that the Conspiracy is guarding the edge to prevent people from getting too close to the truth.

sky mirrors:
Quote from: Parsifal on May 12, 2010, 01:15:02 PM
Quote from: Thevoiceofreason on May 12, 2010, 10:18:06 AM
Feature: Lighting of the Earth
Evidence: Midnight Sun- around the NH winter solstice, antarctica gets 24 hours of light
Source: http://www.worsleyschool.net/science/files/antarctica/page.html
Explanation in RET: the Earth is tilted 23.5 degrees, so antarctica being south-most, points to the sun always
Why FET isnotdoinitrite: take two opposite points on antartica on the FET map. take the points on that diameter. how could the all the points near the circumference see light, but not all of the points on the diameter?
Yet again, you have linked to a website that agrees with you but that doesn't actually prove anything. And yet again, there are several theories of how this might be integrated into FET, including my Sky Mirror hypothesis and Wilmore's alternative FE map.

australia:
Quote from: Hazbollah on September 07, 2010, 02:38:02 PM
Australia is a lie perpetuated by the conspiracy. It is in fact part of Africa.
Logged
round earther
Quote from:  topic#19384
Gravity as a force does not exist
Quote from: FAQ
Q: Why does g vary with altitude if the Earth simply accelerates up?

A: The celestial bodies have a slight gravitational pull.
*

Ski

  • Planar Moderator
  • 8738
  • Homines, dum docent, dispenguin.
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #485 on: October 29, 2010, 04:34:32 PM »
Quote from: wecl0me12 on October 29, 2010, 04:13:10 PM
1. OP: Basically, I'm going to assume that every single person on my list wants to get paid so that they won't talk about the conspiracy. They're going to want a lot of it, too, most likely. Probably enough so that they won't have to work for the rest of their lives? Well, how's about something like one million dollars per year, plus one million in advance. That's far better than most jobs can fetch, and all they have to do is shut up. Minus the top five or so, since they are the runners of the organization.

Since we're all assuming, I'm going to assume if I give you one or two million dollars in exchange for your integrity and promise you more to come, I can later keep you silent by threatening you and/or your family.


Quote
2.
ice wall guards
FAQ:

Q: "Why has no one taken a photo of the Earth that proves it is flat?"

A: ...  It is also possible that the Conspiracy is guarding the edge to prevent people from getting too close to the truth.

Also from the FAQ: "But even so there's no reason to assume the Ice Wall is guarded"


Sky mirrors (atleast as you are postulating) and Australia not existing are laughable and untenable beliefs held by noone on the forum.
Logged
"Never think you can turn over any old falsehood without a terrible squirming of the horrid little population that dwells under it." -O.W. Holmes "Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne.."
*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 42529
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #486 on: October 29, 2010, 04:39:37 PM »
Quote from: Tom Bishop on October 29, 2010, 03:17:13 PM
So it costs more to pretend to go into space than to actually go into space?  ??? 

Well, there are all those outer space sets that you have to build.  Camera crews, lighting, etc.  Have you seen the budgets of modern scifi movies lately?  Who says that CGI is making movies less expensive to make?
Logged
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5039
  • Magic specialist
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #487 on: October 29, 2010, 05:26:27 PM »
Quote from: wecl0me12 on October 29, 2010, 03:31:50 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_astronauts_by_name
548 astronauts, 548,000,000 USD/year, and many more scientists. Now with space tourism, that is going to increase much more. a real spaceflight, is a 1 time cost of $1.7 billion.  (source:
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/kennedy/about/information/shuttle_faq.html#1 )
in just 4 years, a real spaceflight would cost less.

$548 million is just for the astronauts, faking Australia, guarding the ice wall, sky mirrors, programs to fake images, etc. all cost money.

so yes, it does cost more to fake a space flight than to actually have one.

Not to mention the costs of actually doing the observable day-to-day operations that we can observe NASA doing, along with actually launching fake spaceships all the time.
Logged
Quote from: Thork on April 02, 2012, 01:56:05 AM
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5039
  • Magic specialist
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #488 on: October 29, 2010, 05:28:38 PM »
Quote from: Ski on October 29, 2010, 04:34:32 PM
Sky mirrors (atleast as you are postulating) and Australia not existing are laughable and untenable beliefs held by noone on the forum.


Perhaps you should tell that to the people on the forum who have repeatedly claimed those things.
Logged
Quote from: Thork on April 02, 2012, 01:56:05 AM
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
?

RoundEarthGuy

  • 245
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #489 on: October 29, 2010, 05:58:16 PM »
Quote from: General Disarray on October 29, 2010, 05:26:27 PM
Quote from: wecl0me12 on October 29, 2010, 03:31:50 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_astronauts_by_name
548 astronauts, 548,000,000 USD/year, and many more scientists. Now with space tourism, that is going to increase much more. a real spaceflight, is a 1 time cost of $1.7 billion.  (source:
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/kennedy/about/information/shuttle_faq.html#1 )
in just 4 years, a real spaceflight would cost less.

$548 million is just for the astronauts, faking Australia, guarding the ice wall, sky mirrors, programs to fake images, etc. all cost money.

so yes, it does cost more to fake a space flight than to actually have one.

Not to mention the costs of actually doing the observable day-to-day operations that we can observe NASA doing, along with actually launching fake spaceships all the time.

An even bigger problem that mounts on top of that is the engineers and scientists making the "fake spaceships".  If they're not in on the conspiracy, they'll think that they're supposed to make real ones and thus will demand real materials and funding to actually build a spaceship, not a plastic one.  Therefore, the conspirators would have to spend money on that, aka they'd have to buy the materials needed to build a REAL spaceship...to build a fake one.  Therefore, the entire point of the conspiracy would be moot.

If the scientists and engineers are in on it, then that's several thousand more people they'd have to bribe.
Logged
?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5039
  • Magic specialist
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #490 on: October 29, 2010, 06:02:37 PM »
There's also the scientists creating plausible fake data which is supposed to come from satellite telescopes and space stations and feeding it to the "real" scientists.
Logged
Quote from: Thork on April 02, 2012, 01:56:05 AM
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
*

Saddam Hussein

  • Official Member
  • 35374
  • Former President of Iraq
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #491 on: October 29, 2010, 09:10:25 PM »
Quote from: General Disarray on October 29, 2010, 05:28:38 PM
Quote from: Ski on October 29, 2010, 04:34:32 PM
Sky mirrors (atleast as you are postulating) and Australia not existing are laughable and untenable beliefs held by noone on the forum.


Perhaps you should tell that to the people on the forum who have repeatedly claimed those things.

What, you mean the trolls?  That has been said to them many times, but direct confrontations have never stopped trolling on this site before, and I doubt they're going to now.  There's only one way to kill a troll, and the only person who has the power to make it happen is the person who's currently feeding the troll.
Logged
?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5039
  • Magic specialist
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #492 on: October 29, 2010, 10:41:26 PM »
Quote from: Saddam Hussein on October 29, 2010, 09:10:25 PM
Quote from: General Disarray on October 29, 2010, 05:28:38 PM
Quote from: Ski on October 29, 2010, 04:34:32 PM
Sky mirrors (atleast as you are postulating) and Australia not existing are laughable and untenable beliefs held by noone on the forum.


Perhaps you should tell that to the people on the forum who have repeatedly claimed those things.

What, you mean the trolls?  That has been said to them many times, but direct confrontations have never stopped trolling on this site before, and I doubt they're going to now.  There's only one way to kill a troll, and the only person who has the power to make it happen is the person who's currently feeding the troll.

Moderators could help, but they choose to allow (some might say encourage) such behavior.
Logged
Quote from: Thork on April 02, 2012, 01:56:05 AM
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.
*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 17673
  • President of The Flat Earth Society
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #493 on: November 04, 2010, 06:53:34 PM »
Quote from: wecl0me12 on October 29, 2010, 04:13:10 PM
Quote from: Ski on October 29, 2010, 03:46:32 PM
Quote from: wecl0me12 on October 29, 2010, 03:31:50 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_astronauts_by_name
548 astronauts, 548,000,000 USD/year, and many more scientists. Now with space tourism, that is going to increase much more. a real spaceflight, is a 1 time cost of $1.7 billion.  

I'm not sure how you arrived at your figure of a million a year. Seems arbitrary.


Quote
$548 million is just for the astronauts, faking Australia, guarding the ice wall, sky mirrors, programs to fake images, etc. all cost money.

I don't think you'll find anyone who believes conspirators do anything on your list other than "programs to fake images".

1. OP: Basically, I'm going to assume that every single person on my list wants to get paid so that they won't talk about the conspiracy. They're going to want a lot of it, too, most likely. Probably enough so that they won't have to work for the rest of their lives? Well, how's about something like one million dollars per year, plus one million in advance. That's far better than most jobs can fetch, and all they have to do is shut up. Minus the top five or so, since they are the runners of the organization.

Or hows about "we'll kill your family in front of you and torture you until death if you talk; if you don't you'll live comfortably."

You seem to think that if there is a conspiracy they are hiring on Monster.com.  Those that would be in the conspiracy are there because they either want to be or have no option.
Logged
The illusion is shattered if we ask what goes on behind the scenes.
*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 42529
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #494 on: November 04, 2010, 07:16:24 PM »
Quote from: Username on November 04, 2010, 06:53:34 PM
Or hows about "we'll kill your family in front of you and torture you until death if you talk; if you don't you'll live comfortably."

Do you have any evidence to support this statement or is it just speculation?
Logged
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
*

Hessy

  • 1185
  • My alts: Edgeworth, any/all spambots
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #495 on: November 05, 2010, 09:54:24 AM »
To think that everyone in on the Conspiracy, whether threatened or bribed, would stay silent about the manner is ignorant.  No half-decent conspiracy covering up the true shape of the Earth would rely on threatened and bribed people to hold their lies together.
Logged
?

wecl0me12

  • 142
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #496 on: November 05, 2010, 02:32:48 PM »
Quote from: Username on November 04, 2010, 06:53:34 PM
Quote from: wecl0me12 on October 29, 2010, 04:13:10 PM
Quote from: Ski on October 29, 2010, 03:46:32 PM
Quote from: wecl0me12 on October 29, 2010, 03:31:50 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_astronauts_by_name
548 astronauts, 548,000,000 USD/year, and many more scientists. Now with space tourism, that is going to increase much more. a real spaceflight, is a 1 time cost of $1.7 billion.  

I'm not sure how you arrived at your figure of a million a year. Seems arbitrary.


Quote
$548 million is just for the astronauts, faking Australia, guarding the ice wall, sky mirrors, programs to fake images, etc. all cost money.

I don't think you'll find anyone who believes conspirators do anything on your list other than "programs to fake images".

1. OP: Basically, I'm going to assume that every single person on my list wants to get paid so that they won't talk about the conspiracy. They're going to want a lot of it, too, most likely. Probably enough so that they won't have to work for the rest of their lives? Well, how's about something like one million dollars per year, plus one million in advance. That's far better than most jobs can fetch, and all they have to do is shut up. Minus the top five or so, since they are the runners of the organization.

Or hows about "we'll kill your family in front of you and torture you until death if you talk; if you don't you'll live comfortably."

You seem to think that if there is a conspiracy they are hiring on Monster.com.  Those that would be in the conspiracy are there because they either want to be or have no option.
so there are five hundred astronauts all being threatened? they would all rebel.
Also, in Thomas Baron's case, the police ruled it as a suicide, why not a murder? if he really was murdered, the police's investigations would reveal this.
Unless the police and detectives are also in the conspiracy. The police have guns, and at least some would kill the top conspirators for threatening them.
You also have to prove that the conspiracy threatens people.
Logged
round earther
Quote from:  topic#19384
Gravity as a force does not exist
Quote from: FAQ
Q: Why does g vary with altitude if the Earth simply accelerates up?

A: The celestial bodies have a slight gravitational pull.
*

Death-T

  • 504
  • Conspiracy theories are my bread and butter.
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #497 on: November 06, 2010, 09:00:58 AM »
Quote from: Tom Bishop on October 29, 2010, 03:17:13 PM
Quote from: General Disarray on October 29, 2010, 10:15:17 AM
Quote from: Hessy on October 29, 2010, 09:31:03 AM
Don't you think someone would notice ~~$15.7 million going to the top three NASA guys that should've gone to the actual space program?  That means not only would those three need to be involved (as well as countless others, really) but the people who do their finances.

Since no one can show that a conspiracy would not cost more than an actual space program, this is a moot point.

So it costs more to pretend to go into space than to actually go into space?  ???

Depends on the context. If you mean to aid the conspiracy - yes. If you to take into account that almost everything you would need to actually go in space is still needed to fake it. Hell, it would even cost more considering you need to keep the 'truth' under wraps through the usage of intimidation, bribes, and other expenses. Not to mention the outrageous amounts of money they would need to hand out to make sure not a single one of their workers is actually willing to prove the existance of the conspiracy by providing proof. 
Logged
" Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. " - Albert Einstein

" We are imperfect.  We cannot expect perfect government. "  ~William Howard Taft
?

spindac

Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #498 on: November 07, 2010, 11:53:19 AM »
Why can't I find any mention of the Ariane Rocket or of the European Space Agency on this Forum...

Are the Governments of 10 European Countries, and the civilian companies that have payloads launched by Ariane, in the Conspiracy too ??

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariane_%28rocket_family%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Space_Agency

Or are these companies being lied to, that they have functioning satellites in orbit ....

Logged
?

Erland

  • 72
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #499 on: November 20, 2010, 01:18:01 PM »
Ok, I don't have the energy to read the entire 25-pages tread. I just wonder:

The conspiracy couldn't work if not most people believed that the earth is round. How did most people come to believe that?
Logged
*

Hessy

  • 1185
  • My alts: Edgeworth, any/all spambots
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #500 on: November 22, 2010, 09:31:15 AM »
Quote from: Erland on November 20, 2010, 01:18:01 PM
Ok, I don't have the energy to read the entire 25-pages tread. I just wonder:

The conspiracy couldn't work if not most people believed that the earth is round. How did most people come to believe that?

I imagine all the facts and repeatable observations in RET convinced most people that the Earth is round.
Logged
*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 17673
  • President of The Flat Earth Society
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #501 on: November 23, 2010, 10:18:32 AM »
Quote from: Hessy on November 22, 2010, 09:31:15 AM
Quote from: Erland on November 20, 2010, 01:18:01 PM
Ok, I don't have the energy to read the entire 25-pages tread. I just wonder:

The conspiracy couldn't work if not most people believed that the earth is round. How did most people come to believe that?

I imagine all the facts and repeatable observations in RET convinced most people that the Earth is round.
This is likely part of the issue.  The RE model is quite robust in its predictive abilities.  However, prediction does not imply truth, as can be evidence time and time again even within science and the foundations of science.
Logged
The illusion is shattered if we ask what goes on behind the scenes.
*

Hessy

  • 1185
  • My alts: Edgeworth, any/all spambots
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #502 on: November 29, 2010, 10:03:07 AM »
Quote from: John Davis on November 23, 2010, 10:18:32 AM
Quote from: Hessy on November 22, 2010, 09:31:15 AM
Quote from: Erland on November 20, 2010, 01:18:01 PM
Ok, I don't have the energy to read the entire 25-pages tread. I just wonder:

The conspiracy couldn't work if not most people believed that the earth is round. How did most people come to believe that?

I imagine all the facts and repeatable observations in RET convinced most people that the Earth is round.
This is likely part of the issue.  The RE model is quite robust in its predictive abilities.  However, prediction does not imply truth, as can be evidence time and time again even within science and the foundations of science.
Of course not.  But most people are surely more likely to follow a theory which they can recreate themselves, and ultimately reproduce the same results as everyone else.  Hence RET's mass following.
Logged
*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 42529
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #503 on: November 29, 2010, 01:26:24 PM »
Quote from: John Davis on November 23, 2010, 10:18:32 AM
The RE model is quite robust in its predictive abilities.  However, prediction does not imply truth, as can be evidence time and time again even within science and the foundations of science.

However, accurate predictions are usually a pretty good sign that you're on the right track.
Logged
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
?

Demouse

  • 323
  • Mods don't like my haiku
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #504 on: March 08, 2011, 03:01:47 PM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 18, 2006, 12:22:53 PM
Quote from: rr332211
Gravity makes perfect sense, and all the numbers fit.

Uh, oh, you said the magic phrase.  

Gravity makes perfect sense?  Can you explain what gravity is?  I would like to know how this magical 'force' works.

I cannot into quantum phisics.
Logged


____________________________________________

Oh Skycake.... Why are you so delicious?

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 42529
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #505 on: March 08, 2011, 07:04:57 PM »
Quote from: Demouse on March 08, 2011, 03:01:47 PM
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 18, 2006, 12:22:53 PM
Quote from: rr332211
Gravity makes perfect sense, and all the numbers fit.

Uh, oh, you said the magic phrase.  

Gravity makes perfect sense?  Can you explain what gravity is?  I would like to know how this magical 'force' works.

I cannot into quantum phisics.

Please do not bump a thread unless you have something productive to add to the discussion.
Logged
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
*

hoppy

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 11803
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #506 on: March 10, 2011, 06:17:08 PM »
Quote from: markjo on March 08, 2011, 07:04:57 PM
Quote from: Demouse on March 08, 2011, 03:01:47 PM
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 18, 2006, 12:22:53 PM
Quote from: rr332211
Gravity makes perfect sense, and all the numbers fit.

Uh, oh, you said the magic phrase.  

Gravity makes perfect sense?  Can you explain what gravity is?  I would like to know how this magical 'force' works.

I cannot into quantum phisics.

Please do not bump a thread unless you have something productive to add to the discussion.
Logged
God is real.                                         
http://www.scribd.com/doc/9665708/Flat-Earth-Bible-02-of-10-The-Flat-Earth
*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 27043
  • I'm the boss.
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #507 on: March 10, 2011, 07:48:45 PM »
Quote from: hoppy on March 10, 2011, 06:17:08 PM
Quote from: markjo on March 08, 2011, 07:04:57 PM
Quote from: Demouse on March 08, 2011, 03:01:47 PM
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 18, 2006, 12:22:53 PM
Quote from: rr332211
Gravity makes perfect sense, and all the numbers fit.

Uh, oh, you said the magic phrase.  

Gravity makes perfect sense?  Can you explain what gravity is?  I would like to know how this magical 'force' works.

I cannot into quantum phisics.

Please do not bump a thread unless you have something productive to add to the discussion.

hoppy, consider this a warning.  Any more shenanigans and it's a ban.
Logged
Quote from: wise on August 21, 2018, 11:47:45 PM
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?
*

hoppy

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 11803
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #508 on: March 11, 2011, 07:25:34 AM »
Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on March 10, 2011, 07:48:45 PM
Quote from: hoppy on March 10, 2011, 06:17:08 PM
Quote from: markjo on March 08, 2011, 07:04:57 PM
Quote from: Demouse on March 08, 2011, 03:01:47 PM
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 18, 2006, 12:22:53 PM
Quote from: rr332211
Gravity makes perfect sense, and all the numbers fit.

Uh, oh, you said the magic phrase.  

Gravity makes perfect sense?  Can you explain what gravity is?  I would like to know how this magical 'force' works.

I cannot into quantum phisics.

Please do not bump a thread unless you have something productive to add to the discussion.

hoppy, consider this a warning.  Any more shenanigans and it's a ban.
  Please do not threaten me.. I plan to post startling new evidence within the next 2 weeks. It will be conclusive evidence for either RE or FE. Hopefully the ban will be over by then.
Logged
God is real.                                         
http://www.scribd.com/doc/9665708/Flat-Earth-Bible-02-of-10-The-Flat-Earth
?

Kryyon

  • 1
Re: The Conclusive Categorical Conspiracy Compendium
« Reply #509 on: June 24, 2011, 06:49:15 AM »
I was reading the first post of this topic and I could not believe what I read...

You seriously think the top 3 people of NASA can just steal those millions? There is a reason they get a lot of money from the US Government, because they spend it! Millions go to the salaries of engineers, the costs of materials, fuel etc. How would they fake that?

I am currently studying to become an aerospace engineer, and I can tell you that there is no way that all the engineers and scientists from NASA can be fooled by computer simulated images made by 6 (!!!) people. Sure the general public can be fooled by them, there are enough idiots on this earth (Google: Creationism), but to think that every scientist on the earth is either in on the conspiracy or unaware of the fact that the earth is flat is preposterous. You don't seriously think that do you?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 [17] 18 19   Go Up
« previous next »