Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m

  • 280 Replies
  • 269651 Views
*

cikljamas

  • 2466
  • +1/-2
  • Ex nihilo nihil fit
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #30 on: February 27, 2015, 08:11:36 AM »




« Last Edit: February 27, 2015, 08:51:26 AM by cikljamas »
"I can't breathe" George Floyd RIP

*

Mainframes

  • 2088
  • +0/-0
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #31 on: February 27, 2015, 09:09:38 AM »






It's determined by economics. Given the choice no-one would fly that route ut there simply is very little demand to fly to Montevideo and even less from Capetown. A central European hub is the only place that flies to Montevideo direct so therefore you have to travel to Europe from South Africa first.

Unless of course you are rich enough to charter a private flight.
Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by ignorance or stupidity.

?

Alpha2Omega

  • 4107
  • +1/-1
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #32 on: February 27, 2015, 10:48:10 AM »
What would make even more sense would be the Capetown - Johannesburg - Rio - Montevideo itinerary. It takes about half as long, even with two stops instead of one. J'burg - Rio leg is 10h 15m.

Did you search for a "direct" flight and got the one through Paris? Learning the difference between direct and nonstop flights might make it look more like you know what you're talking about.

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

*

Mikey T.

  • 3546
  • +0/-1
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #33 on: February 27, 2015, 01:14:50 PM »
WTH happened to that last map cik posted looks like Salvador Dali got ahold of it.

*

cikljamas

  • 2466
  • +1/-2
  • Ex nihilo nihil fit
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #34 on: February 27, 2015, 02:04:23 PM »
99 % of all air traffic in the world goes through these airports. All these airports are placed above the equator:







« Last Edit: February 27, 2015, 02:08:18 PM by cikljamas »
"I can't breathe" George Floyd RIP

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #35 on: February 27, 2015, 02:06:28 PM »
And?
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

kman

  • 990
  • +0/-0
  • Pastafarian
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #36 on: February 27, 2015, 02:08:19 PM »
many of these people who live above the equator travel towards places which are placed below equator (for many reasons).

Such as...? Most commerce and travel goes between places like New York and Beijing, not places like New York and Auckland, new zealend.
Quote from: Excelsior John
[USA TODAY and NPR] are probaley just a bunch of flippin wite sapremist websites you RASCIST
Quote from: modestman
i don't understand what you are saying=therfore you are liar

?

Saros

  • 403
  • +0/-0
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #37 on: February 27, 2015, 02:13:22 PM »
...

As I said, I know that it is odd that there are so few direct flights (as your links confirm), but some flights do seem to exist.

Why don't you simply do a google search. Most flights don't go through Paris at all. You can find an option even through Japan if you want, but it doesn't mean it is recommended to buy that one. There are always many ways to reach your destination, it is up to the customer whether they would prefer the layover to be Paris or Sao Paolo or Tokyo.  The nonstop flights take around 17-20 hours with two stops. For example, Capetown - Johannesburg, Johannesburg-Sao Paolo/Rio de Janeiro then Montevideo.

*

cikljamas

  • 2466
  • +1/-2
  • Ex nihilo nihil fit
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #38 on: February 27, 2015, 02:17:46 PM »
And?

There is still 12 % of all people in the world (about 800 millions) who live below equator, but most of the flights between places which are situated below equator are still directed through these airports which are above the equator. How come?
"I can't breathe" George Floyd RIP

?

Saros

  • 403
  • +0/-0
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #39 on: February 27, 2015, 02:18:22 PM »
99 % of all air traffic in the world goes through these airports. All these airports are placed above the equator:


Cikljamas, are you trolling now? Of course, the air traffic would go through those airports. After all, 90% of the biggest cities are above the equator. How does this prove flat Earth is beyond me.

*

Lemmiwinks

  • 2161
  • +0/-0
  • President of the Non-Conformist Zetetic Council
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #40 on: February 27, 2015, 02:25:12 PM »
WTH happened to that last map cik posted looks like Salvador Dali got ahold of it.

He will never answer this question.
I have 13 [academic qualifications] actually. I'll leave it up to you to guess which, or simply call me a  liar. Either is fine.

Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur

?

Saros

  • 403
  • +0/-0
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #41 on: February 27, 2015, 02:28:26 PM »
And?

There is still 12 % of all people in the world (about 800 millions) who live below equator, but most of the flights between places which are situated below equator are still directed through these airports which are above the equator. How come?

That is just not true.

Sydney-Johannesburg - nonstop flights - 6 times per week - 14 hours - Qantas 63
Johannesburg - Sao Paolo - nonstop flights - at least one flight per day - 10 hours
South African 222 or South African 224
Auckland, NZ to Sao Paolo, Brazil through Santiago, Chile - 17 hours - LAN


So what are you saying again?

It seems to me you just can't search for the best connections. You do realize that what you found are not nonstop flights? You can find similar super long connections through any major airport, but you can also find nonstop flights. It is not a conspiracy, it is totally normal. If someone wants to fly to Paris and then to Sao Paolo, they can do that. If they want to fly directly to Sao Paolo they can do that too. Absolutely meaningless debate.


*

cikljamas

  • 2466
  • +1/-2
  • Ex nihilo nihil fit
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #42 on: February 27, 2015, 02:45:38 PM »
And?

There is still 12 % of all people in the world (about 800 millions) who live below equator, but most of the flights between places which are situated below equator are still directed through these airports which are above the equator. How come?

That is just not true.

Sydney-Johannesburg - nonstop flights - 6 times per week - 14 hours - Qantas 63
Johannesburg - Sao Paolo - nonstop flights - at least one flight per day - 10 hours
South African 222 or South African 224
Auckland, NZ to Sao Paolo, Brazil through Santiago, Chile - 17 hours - LAN


So what are you saying again?

It seems to me you just can't search for the best connections. You do realize that what you found are not nonstop flights? You can find similar super long connections through any major airport, but you can also find nonstop flights. It is not a conspiracy, it is totally normal. If someone wants to fly to Paris and then to Sao Paolo, they can do that. If they want to fly directly to Sao Paolo they can do that too. Absolutely meaningless debate.

It seems that this guy also can't search for the best connections : " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

Three questions for you:

1. What do you think of what has been said in this video?
2. If these flights exist and if these flight times are correct what would you conclude out of this?
3. Do you still believe that Zibn Rahman's flat earth map is worthy of wasting your precious time?
"I can't breathe" George Floyd RIP

*

cikljamas

  • 2466
  • +1/-2
  • Ex nihilo nihil fit
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #43 on: February 27, 2015, 03:19:31 PM »
Acenci, the earth is flat. Whenever a slightest doubt begins to bother you, just start to read my GLOBAL CONSPIRACY thread, in this thread you will find many cures for your doubts.

As for these flights, don't you know what is at stake here?

Apollo missions
Space Shuttle program
International Space Station
Whole bunch of satellites which don't exist but they are still orbiting the earth
Russian alleged Soyouz space missions
Gagarin, the first man who had been in earth's orbit
Chinese space program
Etc...

How difficult task would be for these professional liars to cover up true data regarding these flights below equator also?

How come that NASA shills are available 24 hours a day for answering to all possible questions that someone could come up with?

How come that NASA's main site is named Flat Earth Society?
"I can't breathe" George Floyd RIP

?

Saros

  • 403
  • +0/-0
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #44 on: February 27, 2015, 03:20:25 PM »
And?

There is still 12 % of all people in the world (about 800 millions) who live below equator, but most of the flights between places which are situated below equator are still directed through these airports which are above the equator. How come?

That is just not true.

Sydney-Johannesburg - nonstop flights - 6 times per week - 14 hours - Qantas 63
Johannesburg - Sao Paolo - nonstop flights - at least one flight per day - 10 hours
South African 222 or South African 224
Auckland, NZ to Sao Paolo, Brazil through Santiago, Chile - 17 hours - LAN


So what are you saying again?

It seems to me you just can't search for the best connections. You do realize that what you found are not nonstop flights? You can find similar super long connections through any major airport, but you can also find nonstop flights. It is not a conspiracy, it is totally normal. If someone wants to fly to Paris and then to Sao Paolo, they can do that. If they want to fly directly to Sao Paolo they can do that too. Absolutely meaningless debate.

It seems that this guy also can't search for the best connections : " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

Three questions for you:

1. What do you think of what has been said in this video?
2. If these flights exist and if these flight times are correct what would you conclude out of this?
3. Do you still believe that Zibn Rahman's flat earth map is worthy of wasting your precious time?

One can waste their time on whatever they want. Wasting time here is not much better either. Obviously, if I am on the Internet I am wasting my time by default. Otherwise, I will be doing something more important. I don't believe in any entertainment videos(at least not uncritically), although I might find them interesting.

About the video link you posted. I watched it. The guy is full of it!  That is nonsense. He just talks very well(yet too much), but he is also lying like crazy. Of course he might not get nonstop flights if he tries to book for specific dates. Try with flexible dates and you will have them. He is just incompetent at booking flights or heavily trying to manipulate the gullible viewers. I gave you a list of real nonstop flights and you totally ignored it. What you're doing is absolutely meaningless, because you're certainly wasting everyone's time and it is not even funny.
Here is the flight which supposedly doesn't exist.


?

Saros

  • 403
  • +0/-0
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #45 on: February 27, 2015, 03:28:34 PM »


Here is also another "impossible" flight. Auckland, NZ to Santiago, Chile - NONSTOP for 13h10m
Please before believing in complete nonsense next time do your homework and check for yourself.

*

Scroto Gaggins

  • 671
  • +0/-0
  • Hobbiton represent
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #46 on: February 27, 2015, 03:49:08 PM »
99 % of all air traffic in the world goes through these airports. All these airports are placed above the equator:



Im pretty sure tokyo has got no 'i' in it, and dallas has two 'l's.
Also, saudi arabia and thailand aren't cities, dumbass.
They are taking the hobbits to Isengard.

*

cikljamas

  • 2466
  • +1/-2
  • Ex nihilo nihil fit
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #47 on: February 27, 2015, 03:49:30 PM »
Saros,

How come that you have skipped this question:

2. If these flights exist and if these flight times are correct what would you conclude out of this?

Allow me to ask you one more question:

Are you still unable to understand my ZIGZAG argument?
"I can't breathe" George Floyd RIP

*

cikljamas

  • 2466
  • +1/-2
  • Ex nihilo nihil fit
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #48 on: February 27, 2015, 03:57:09 PM »
Scrotto Gaggins, dumbass,

You take food on your ass-hole, and your mouth is full of shit! It should be other way around, don't you think so?
"I can't breathe" George Floyd RIP

*

Scroto Gaggins

  • 671
  • +0/-0
  • Hobbiton represent
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #49 on: February 27, 2015, 03:59:40 PM »
Scrotto Gaggins, dumbass,

You take food on your ass-hole, and your mouth is full of shit! It should be other way around, don't you think so?

Yes, my anus is hungry. But you still cant spell correctly.
They are taking the hobbits to Isengard.

?

Saros

  • 403
  • +0/-0
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #50 on: February 27, 2015, 04:03:38 PM »
Saros,

How come that you have skipped this question:

2. If these flights exist and if these flight times are correct what would you conclude out of this?

Allow me to ask you one more question:

Are you still unable to understand my ZIGZAG argument?

I would conclude you and acenci are totally naive to even doubt that they don't exist. Did you see the screenshots at all? You were claiming all flights go through Paris or whatever.
I understand the zigzag argument, but it is wrong. I mean, come on, why do you think you're the only one who thinks it is real? How is this relevant to this topic though? You guys are very inconsistent and when people point out your mistakes you still believe you're correct. Well, that is ridiculous. A person can be wrong, that is normal, deal with it.

*

Lemmiwinks

  • 2161
  • +0/-0
  • President of the Non-Conformist Zetetic Council
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #51 on: February 27, 2015, 04:05:21 PM »
Scrotto Gaggins, dumbass,

You take food on your ass-hole, and your mouth is full of shit! It should be other way around, don't you think so?

Quoted for posterity sake.
I have 13 [academic qualifications] actually. I'll leave it up to you to guess which, or simply call me a  liar. Either is fine.

Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur

*

cikljamas

  • 2466
  • +1/-2
  • Ex nihilo nihil fit
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #52 on: February 27, 2015, 04:08:23 PM »
Acenci, the earth is flat. Whenever a slightest doubt begins to bother you, just start to read my GLOBAL CONSPIRACY thread, in this thread you will find many cures for your doubts.

As for these flights, don't you know what is at stake here?

Apollo missions
Space Shuttle program
International Space Station
Whole bunch of satellites which don't exist but they are still orbiting the earth
Russian alleged Soyouz space missions
Gagarin, the first man who had been in earth's orbit
Chinese space program
Etc...

How difficult task would be for these professional liars to cover up true data regarding these flights below equator also?

How come that NASA shills are available 24 hours a day for answering to all possible questions that someone could come up with?

How come that NASA's main site is named Flat Earth Society?

Ok, so I keep my belief in flat earth and I add to this belief these two:

1) the map is correct and the flight is faked
2) I need to investigate on how exactly they are faking these few southern hemisphere flights and if there are real passengers or not

Thanks Acenci for your loyalty!

A real proofs in favor of flat earth are available in my GLOBAL CONSPIRACY thread. There (in my thread) are many proofs in favor of immobile and flat earth, so, i am perfectly calm and relaxed concernig the final outcome of this issue. Whatever comes out as the final truth regarding these flights, it cannot and will not disprove the fact that the Earth is at rest and that the surface of the Earth is generally flat!
"I can't breathe" George Floyd RIP

?

Saros

  • 403
  • +0/-0
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #53 on: February 27, 2015, 04:08:36 PM »
Acenci, the earth is flat. Whenever a slightest doubt begins to bother you, just start to read my GLOBAL CONSPIRACY thread, in this thread you will find many cures for your doubts.

As for these flights, don't you know what is at stake here?

Apollo missions
Space Shuttle program
International Space Station
Whole bunch of satellites which don't exist but they are still orbiting the earth
Russian alleged Soyouz space missions
Gagarin, the first man who had been in earth's orbit
Chinese space program
Etc...

How difficult task would be for these professional liars to cover up true data regarding these flights below equator also?

How come that NASA shills are available 24 hours a day for answering to all possible questions that someone could come up with?

How come that NASA's main site is named Flat Earth Society?

Ok, so I keep my belief in flat earth and I add to this belief these two:

1) the map is correct and the flight is faked
2) I need to investigate on how exactly they are faking these few southern hemisphere flights and if there are real passengers or not

That was the most bizarre thing I have read here so far. How are the flights faked? Are you trolling? Anyone can buy a ticket for those flights. The flat Earth map is meaningless. Deal with it.

*

cikljamas

  • 2466
  • +1/-2
  • Ex nihilo nihil fit
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #54 on: February 27, 2015, 04:14:10 PM »
Saros,

So, you are still unable to understand my ZIGZAG argument?

Well, this is really sad!

Go ahead, fight for them (RET), and you can spit to your "Elbrus" argument, also, although it is nice FET argument, and always will be...

Flat earth map is meaningless, but Zib Rahman's idiotic flat earth map is not meaningless?

It seems that you have lost your mind my dear friend!
« Last Edit: February 27, 2015, 04:17:45 PM by cikljamas »
"I can't breathe" George Floyd RIP

?

Saros

  • 403
  • +0/-0
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #55 on: February 27, 2015, 04:14:31 PM »
By the way, I am certain you guys are trolls big time. You just get some weird satisfaction from bullshitting and making the others debate with you. You can't change your mind about stuff every day when it is convenient for you and pretend you're serious. First, you claim there aren't any nonstop flights, then it turns out there are, then you don't admit you were totally wrong and instead focus on some other bullshit. Great. That just proves after all this website is for kicks! Role-playing fun site.

?

Saros

  • 403
  • +0/-0
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #56 on: February 27, 2015, 04:22:59 PM »
Saros,

So, you are still unable to understand my ZIGZAG argument?

Well, this is really sad!

Go ahead, fight for them (RET), and you can spit to your "Elbrus" argument, also, although it is nice FET argument, and always will be...

Yeah, whatever. I am not fighting for any RE'ers, I am fighting for the truth which is THERE ARE nonstop flights in the southern hemisphere from Australia and New Zealand  to South America and from South Africa to South America. Period. You can't simply bullshit all the time and expect people to agree with you and also forget you screwed up 5 minutes ago and then keep your credibility. That is just pathetic. If you can't prove something it is normal to at least say that you're not sure instead of pretending you're a genius and have discovered something no one has ever noticed, plus offending people. Alright, pretend, but when you see you might be wrong why being stubborn and act like you're still right?

*

Mikey T.

  • 3546
  • +0/-1
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #57 on: February 27, 2015, 05:22:50 PM »
Saros,

So, you are still unable to understand my ZIGZAG argument?

Well, this is really sad!

Go ahead, fight for them (RET), and you can spit to your "Elbrus" argument, also, although it is nice FET argument, and always will be...

Flat earth map is meaningless, but Zib Rahman's idiotic flat earth map is not meaningless?

It seems that you have lost your mind my dear friend!

HURRAY!!! Zig zag argument returns.  I am so proud of you cik.  Stick to your guns my man. 

*

Lemmiwinks

  • 2161
  • +0/-0
  • President of the Non-Conformist Zetetic Council
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #58 on: February 27, 2015, 05:32:04 PM »
Saros,

So, you are still unable to understand my ZIGZAG argument?

Well, this is really sad!

Go ahead, fight for them (RET), and you can spit to your "Elbrus" argument, also, although it is nice FET argument, and always will be...

Flat earth map is meaningless, but Zib Rahman's idiotic flat earth map is not meaningless?

It seems that you have lost your mind my dear friend!

HURRAY!!! Zig zag argument returns.  I am so proud of you cik.  Stick to your guns my man.

Honestly I am surprised Alpha didn't feel a disturbance in the force. Where ever he is sitting or doing just looks off into the distance.

"ZigZag has reared its ugly head. I must go, I am needed elsewhere."
I have 13 [academic qualifications] actually. I'll leave it up to you to guess which, or simply call me a  liar. Either is fine.

Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur

*

Mainframes

  • 2088
  • +0/-0
Re: Sydney(Australia) to Santiago(Chile): direct flight, 12hrs 30m
« Reply #59 on: February 27, 2015, 10:11:32 PM »
For an in depth analysis of th zig-zag arguement please see my profile pic......
Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by ignorance or stupidity.