You seem to be making out that the train itself murdered the critic. How about explaining how he was killed by that train. You know: like, was he walking along a rail track? was his car caught on a level crossing. You know: things like that.
Well, his car was struck by a train. Killed his wife and stepdaughter also.
Are you implying that because it happened at a crossing, foul play was involved?
Do you think it's possible?
It never cease to amuse me—or amaze me—how often obvious irony or paradox goes right over
sceptimatic's head LOL. I've never come across such a non-lateral thinker [
sic] on all my years spent on forums. He reads absolutely everything from a solely literal viewpoint.
And what makes it even funnier is that nine times out of ten, he totally misses the basic thrust of the comment.
Keep up the good work
sceptimatic—we all enjoy a good laugh at someone else's expense.
