Don't think you can outwit me on this.
What are you trying to acheive with this weirdly aggressive attitude? I'm not trying to "outwit you", it's not personal. I'm simply pointing out an error in your statement
The statement that you were using the word "theory" in a more specific sense than Jroa and myself were is
not in error. It is 100% accurate.
I don't have an aggressive attitude, I just have no time for people trying to win an argument through twisting of words. It doesn't matter which side of the debate you're on, I'll still call you out on it.
To use the strict scientific definition, FET is not a theory because there is bugger all to support it. To use the common layman's definition of theory, as in an idea that may or may not be true, it is.