The flat Earth model cannot explain lunar eclipses

  • 156 Replies
  • 57921 Views
*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Planar Moderator
  • 52371
  • +98/-95
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: The flat Earth model cannot explain lunar eclipses
« Reply #150 on: May 23, 2016, 11:28:10 AM »
Well, I did polyphasic sleeping for a while. But I'm not sure that's what you are referring to. Must have been James?

Oh yeah, it was you. I thought it was an experiment, but now I see it is a way of sleeping that is supposed to be more natural.
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: The flat Earth model cannot explain lunar eclipses
« Reply #151 on: May 23, 2016, 11:34:25 AM »
Well, I did polyphasic sleeping for a while. But I'm not sure that's what you are referring to. Must have been James?

Oh yeah, it was you. I thought it was an experiment, but now I see it is a way of sleeping that is supposed to be more natural.

I could be mistaken, but I think mikeman was doing some sleep experiments about a year ago.  I think he was sleeping something like 1 or 2 hours at a time throughout the day or something. 

*

JimmyTheCrab

  • 10340
  • +0/-5
Re: The flat Earth model cannot explain lunar eclipses
« Reply #152 on: May 23, 2016, 12:07:34 PM »
I tried that.  My boss wasn't too happy.
Quote from: mikeman7918
a single photon can pass through two sluts

Quote from: Chicken Fried Clucker
if Donald Trump stuck his penis in me after trying on clothes I would have that date and time burned in my head.

?

jrr777

  • 7
  • +0/-0
Re: The flat Earth model cannot explain lunar eclipses
« Reply #153 on: May 27, 2016, 01:38:09 PM »
The FES hasn't been pushing anything. Most of you angry globularists tend to think there's some flat earth cabal out there corrupting the innocent, but you come here of your own will.
Are you kidding?
The FES pushes the idea that to believe the earth is a globe is to be weak minded and a slave to the "Conspirators". The FES has always had to, by definition, push the flatness of the earth because the idea has not been readily accepted because there's not enough proof to either officiate the FE model or to overturn the RE model. I once saw somebody running through a Tom Bishop post on a piece of visual evidence and there were over a dozen times when he said simply "The photo looks flat because you are looking at a flat plane," or in other words "Well it's flat because it is," and that's something I've seen in many other threads. How in the world is that not literally pushing FE?

There's pushing and there's proving. If you prove it and make the claim that's science. If you skip the proof and go straight to the claim that's pushing the claim. If your claim is disproven but you continue to preach it as fact that's pushing the claim. I've been lurking here for a while now and got tired of seeing FEers continually skip the proof and replace it with character attacks, say RE is impossible because of something they don't understand like why a rotating globe wouldn't throw everybody into space, completely ignore the fundamental principles of geometry that they require to prove the earth is flat, et cetera.

That's why I came here. Of my own free will, yes. I came here because I saw so many people here believing the earth is flat because of fundamentally flawed proofs and believing it was not round because they did not understand the proofs accepted by literally everybody else, and that made me angry and sad. That in turn led me to create an account to help my fellow "angry globularists" point out the obvious that others can't seem to notice.

No, there is just pushing.  For neither can be proven.  I adhere to the word of God.  He tells us that, "the world is established it cannot be moved."  The heliocentric model says, all the earth does is move.  So I guess when it comes to earth, people must decide if they are with God or not.  Does the heliocentric model explain how it all began.  Know, it merely presents logical theories, however nothing that is proof. 

Side with God, and nothing else matters.

?

MisterMane

  • 1
  • +0/-0
Re: The flat Earth model cannot explain lunar eclipses
« Reply #154 on: June 01, 2016, 04:33:52 AM »
Wouldn't the FE model work if the sun and moon rotated around at different heights? Was it assumed the sun and moon were the same size and height from the earth?

?

Kami

  • 1164
  • +2/-0
Re: The flat Earth model cannot explain lunar eclipses
« Reply #155 on: June 01, 2016, 04:38:54 AM »
No, there is just pushing.  For neither can be proven.  I adhere to the word of God.  He tells us that, "the world is established it cannot be moved."  The heliocentric model says, all the earth does is move.  So I guess when it comes to earth, people must decide if they are with God or not.  Does the heliocentric model explain how it all began.  Know, it merely presents logical theories, however nothing that is proof. 

Side with God, and nothing else matters.
Personally, I prefer logical theories over the bible. I will not tell you to abandon your religion, but be careful not to take everything in the bible litearly. I mean, even in genesis there are two differen stories of how the earth was created, so the bible can not be correct everywhere, and was never meant to be.

*

GlaringEye

  • 358
  • +1/-0
Re: The flat Earth model cannot explain lunar eclipses
« Reply #156 on: June 01, 2016, 06:10:40 AM »
Even the Pope says to take the bible with a grain of salt