Are you doubting my academic prowess? Do you have any basis for this outlandish assertion?
Personally, I've never in my life met an individual who possesses
six PhDs. For this reason alone, I find it extremely difficult to accept an anonymous person on a web forum claiming that very distinction could be truthful. Obviously it comes down to your word against mine that you're misrepresenting your academic qualifications, and makes for an ultimately futile debate.
Although a couple of warning bells sounded when reading your claims:
• You repeatedly use the word "degree" instead of the word "doctorate", which is the
worldwide academic term for
all PhDs according to UNESCO in its International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED).
• There is no such doctorate as "General Engineering".
• To write a successful thesis that's engineering- or science-based, one has to accept the principles and practices of the spherical earth geometry.
• Taking psychology "classes" as a minor in engineering doesn't grant you a PhD in psychology.
• You didn't state in what specific field your philosophy PhD was earned.
• Additionally, all PhD candidates must submit a thesis or dissertation often consisting of a body of original academic research, which is in principle worthy of publication in a peer-reviewed context. You've not listed any for us to check. Why not?
• It seems you simply wouldn't have been able to complete six PhDs considering the time scale involved. Typically in the USA, the first phase for a PhD consists of coursework in the candidate's field of study and requires from
one to three years to complete, and depending on the specific field of study, completion of a PhD program usually takes between
four to eight years of study after the Bachelor's Degree. So at a minimum, any/all PhDs require
five years of study and research. Can you confirm that you've spent thirty years obtaining your six (x5yrs) doctorates?
All this sort of information is more than relevant to your claims in having knowledge and access to research that "proves" the existence of the flat earth ice wall, and/or that the continent of Antarctica does not exist. If you're going to use a personal
argumentum ab auctoritate (an argument from authority) to support your flat earth claims, then you must prove that authority unequivocally. Just saying something doesn't make it so or make it true.