# I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge

• 14383 Replies
• 2003107 Views

#### Heiwa

• 10394
• I have been around a long time.
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14100 on: February 22, 2022, 10:30:49 PM »
To bot or not bot is the question.

I thought you were human.

I am. I play tennis at 10 am. Weather here is very good. Abt 20°C in the sun. How are you getting along with your application for €1M?

#### Bullwinkle

• The Elder Ones
• 21053
• Standard Idiot
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14101 on: February 23, 2022, 12:40:12 AM »

#### Heiwa

• 10394
• I have been around a long time.
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14102 on: February 23, 2022, 11:08:19 AM »

#### Stash

• Ethical Stash
• 13398
• I am car!
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14103 on: February 23, 2022, 11:52:12 AM »
My favorite parts from the bot are:

1) The bot kicks off its own “simplified” fuel calculations with, "Evidently it changes when fuel is consumed - but I keep it constant…”. Absolutely hilarious. Calculations based upon no change in mass due to fuel consumption pretty much blows up the bot’s entire premise right out of the starting gate.

2) Astrodynamics professionals try and explain that no, the bot’s “simple” equations are incorrect.  "There are no "my" equations; there are only the proper equations.  Your "simplifications" based on your obviously limited knowledge of astrodynamics do not suffice.  I've given you the hint:  you must consider the natural logarithm of the ratio of start and end masses.” Again, hilarious. Just making up its own calculations with no connection to reality.

3) Lastly, the bot is so stupid it can’t even tell the difference between

2400^2 - 1500^2 = 3,510,000

And this

(2400-1500)^2 = 810,000

All of this crazy, incorrect data is what the bot uses to “judge” entries to some non-challenge. It’s like being the judge of a spelling bee and telling a contestant they lost because they spelled a word according to the dictionary and not according to the judge's “simplified” spelling. Pure insanity.

#### Heiwa

• 10394
• I have been around a long time.
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14104 on: February 23, 2022, 04:08:13 PM »
My favorite parts from the bot are:

1) The bot kicks off its own “simplified” fuel calculations with, "Evidently it changes when fuel is consumed - but I keep it constant…”. Absolutely hilarious. Calculations based upon no change in mass due to fuel consumption pretty much blows up the bot’s entire premise right out of the starting gate.

2) Astrodynamics professionals try and explain that no, the bot’s “simple” equations are incorrect.  "There are no "my" equations; there are only the proper equations.  Your "simplifications" based on your obviously limited knowledge of astrodynamics do not suffice.  I've given you the hint:  you must consider the natural logarithm of the ratio of start and end masses.” Again, hilarious. Just making up its own calculations with no connection to reality.

3) Lastly, the bot is so stupid it can’t even tell the difference between

2400^2 - 1500^2 = 3,510,000

And this

(2400-1500)^2 = 810,000

All of this crazy, incorrect data is what the bot uses to “judge” entries to some non-challenge. It’s like being the judge of a spelling bee and telling a contestant they lost because they spelled a word according to the dictionary and not according to the judge's “simplified” spelling. Pure insanity.
Thanks for bringing the thread back to topic - manned space flight fuel consumption. I pay you €1M if you can calculate the fuel consumed for a return flight from Earth to the Moon, Mars and an Assteroid. I look forward to your calculations and style for transfer of the prize money.

#### Stash

• Ethical Stash
• 13398
• I am car!
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14105 on: February 23, 2022, 04:58:35 PM »
My favorite parts from the bot are:

1) The bot kicks off its own “simplified” fuel calculations with, "Evidently it changes when fuel is consumed - but I keep it constant…”. Absolutely hilarious. Calculations based upon no change in mass due to fuel consumption pretty much blows up the bot’s entire premise right out of the starting gate.

2) Astrodynamics professionals try and explain that no, the bot’s “simple” equations are incorrect.  "There are no "my" equations; there are only the proper equations.  Your "simplifications" based on your obviously limited knowledge of astrodynamics do not suffice.  I've given you the hint:  you must consider the natural logarithm of the ratio of start and end masses.” Again, hilarious. Just making up its own calculations with no connection to reality.

3) Lastly, the bot is so stupid it can’t even tell the difference between

2400^2 - 1500^2 = 3,510,000

And this

(2400-1500)^2 = 810,000

All of this crazy, incorrect data is what the bot uses to “judge” entries to some non-challenge. It’s like being the judge of a spelling bee and telling a contestant they lost because they spelled a word according to the dictionary and not according to the judge's “simplified” spelling. Pure insanity.
Thanks for bringing the thread back to topic - manned space flight fuel consumption. I pay you €1M if you can calculate the fuel consumed for a return flight from Earth to the Moon, Mars and an Assteroid. I look forward to your calculations and style for transfer of the prize money.

The bot would actually have to start with the correct calculations in order to judge. Considering that the bot is an idiot and didn't even start with the correct ones, there is no challenge.

?

#### frenat

• 3752
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14106 on: February 23, 2022, 05:03:51 PM »
My favorite parts from the bot are:

1) The bot kicks off its own “simplified” fuel calculations with, "Evidently it changes when fuel is consumed - but I keep it constant…”. Absolutely hilarious. Calculations based upon no change in mass due to fuel consumption pretty much blows up the bot’s entire premise right out of the starting gate.

2) Astrodynamics professionals try and explain that no, the bot’s “simple” equations are incorrect.  "There are no "my" equations; there are only the proper equations.  Your "simplifications" based on your obviously limited knowledge of astrodynamics do not suffice.  I've given you the hint:  you must consider the natural logarithm of the ratio of start and end masses.” Again, hilarious. Just making up its own calculations with no connection to reality.

3) Lastly, the bot is so stupid it can’t even tell the difference between

2400^2 - 1500^2 = 3,510,000

And this

(2400-1500)^2 = 810,000

All of this crazy, incorrect data is what the bot uses to “judge” entries to some non-challenge. It’s like being the judge of a spelling bee and telling a contestant they lost because they spelled a word according to the dictionary and not according to the judge's “simplified” spelling. Pure insanity.
Thanks for bringing the thread back to topic - manned space flight fuel consumption. I pay you €1M if you can calculate the fuel consumed for a return flight from Earth to the Moon, Mars and an Assteroid. I look forward to your calculations and style for transfer of the prize money.

The bot would actually have to start with the correct calculations in order to judge. Considering that the bot is an idiot and didn't even start with the correct ones, there is no challenge.
The bot didn't even read the post it replied to. It thanked you for bringing the thread back to topic but didn't realize the topic was its own failings.

#### Bullwinkle

• The Elder Ones
• 21053
• Standard Idiot
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14107 on: February 23, 2022, 05:17:03 PM »

How are you getting along with your application for €1M?

We broke up.

#### Heiwa

• 10394
• I have been around a long time.
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14108 on: February 23, 2022, 07:13:55 PM »
My favorite parts from the bot are:

1) The bot kicks off its own “simplified” fuel calculations with, "Evidently it changes when fuel is consumed - but I keep it constant…”. Absolutely hilarious. Calculations based upon no change in mass due to fuel consumption pretty much blows up the bot’s entire premise right out of the starting gate.

2) Astrodynamics professionals try and explain that no, the bot’s “simple” equations are incorrect.  "There are no "my" equations; there are only the proper equations.  Your "simplifications" based on your obviously limited knowledge of astrodynamics do not suffice.  I've given you the hint:  you must consider the natural logarithm of the ratio of start and end masses.” Again, hilarious. Just making up its own calculations with no connection to reality.

3) Lastly, the bot is so stupid it can’t even tell the difference between

2400^2 - 1500^2 = 3,510,000

And this

(2400-1500)^2 = 810,000

All of this crazy, incorrect data is what the bot uses to “judge” entries to some non-challenge. It’s like being the judge of a spelling bee and telling a contestant they lost because they spelled a word according to the dictionary and not according to the judge's “simplified” spelling. Pure insanity.
Thanks for bringing the thread back to topic - manned space flight fuel consumption. I pay you €1M if you can calculate the fuel consumed for a return flight from Earth to the Moon, Mars and an Assteroid. I look forward to your calculations and style for transfer of the prize money.

The bot would actually have to start with the correct calculations in order to judge. Considering that the bot is an idiot and didn't even start with the correct ones, there is no challenge.
You sound like a loser of the Challenge insulting the judge.

#### Stash

• Ethical Stash
• 13398
• I am car!
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14109 on: February 23, 2022, 09:31:14 PM »
My favorite parts from the bot are:

1) The bot kicks off its own “simplified” fuel calculations with, "Evidently it changes when fuel is consumed - but I keep it constant…”. Absolutely hilarious. Calculations based upon no change in mass due to fuel consumption pretty much blows up the bot’s entire premise right out of the starting gate.

2) Astrodynamics professionals try and explain that no, the bot’s “simple” equations are incorrect.  "There are no "my" equations; there are only the proper equations.  Your "simplifications" based on your obviously limited knowledge of astrodynamics do not suffice.  I've given you the hint:  you must consider the natural logarithm of the ratio of start and end masses.” Again, hilarious. Just making up its own calculations with no connection to reality.

3) Lastly, the bot is so stupid it can’t even tell the difference between

2400^2 - 1500^2 = 3,510,000

And this

(2400-1500)^2 = 810,000

All of this crazy, incorrect data is what the bot uses to “judge” entries to some non-challenge. It’s like being the judge of a spelling bee and telling a contestant they lost because they spelled a word according to the dictionary and not according to the judge's “simplified” spelling. Pure insanity.
Thanks for bringing the thread back to topic - manned space flight fuel consumption. I pay you €1M if you can calculate the fuel consumed for a return flight from Earth to the Moon, Mars and an Assteroid. I look forward to your calculations and style for transfer of the prize money.

The bot would actually have to start with the correct calculations in order to judge. Considering that the bot is an idiot and didn't even start with the correct ones, there is no challenge.
You sound like a loser of the Challenge insulting the judge.

I'm insulting a bot.

The bot doesn't seem to understand that it's using its own made up incorrect calculations. Literally saying 2+2=5. If anyone doesn't use the bot's incorrect calculations then the judge-bot will deem it a loss. That's not a challenge. The bot can't start with a wrong calculations and expect someone using the right calculations to win.
The challenge is not a challenge. It's based on a false made-up premise from the get-go.

As evidenced by the bot's inability to use the correct math:

1) The bot kicks off its own “simplified” fuel calculations with, "Evidently it changes when fuel is consumed - but I keep it constant”. Absolutely hilarious. Calculations based upon no change in mass due to fuel consumption pretty much blows up the bot’s entire premise right out of the starting gate.

2) Astrodynamics professionals try and explain that no, the bot’s “simple” equations are incorrect.  "There are no "my" equations; there are only the proper equations.  Your "simplifications" based on your obviously limited knowledge of astrodynamics do not suffice.  I've given you the hint:  you must consider the natural logarithm of the ratio of start and end masses.” Again, hilarious. Just making up its own calculations with no connection to reality.

3) Lastly, the bot is so stupid it can’t even tell the difference between

2400^2 - 1500^2 = 3,510,000

And this

(2400-1500)^2 = 810,000

This challenge is invalid. Period.

#### Heiwa

• 10394
• I have been around a long time.
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14110 on: February 23, 2022, 10:18:08 PM »
My favorite parts from the bot are:

1) The bot kicks off its own “simplified” fuel calculations with, "Evidently it changes when fuel is consumed - but I keep it constant…”. Absolutely hilarious. Calculations based upon no change in mass due to fuel consumption pretty much blows up the bot’s entire premise right out of the starting gate.

2) Astrodynamics professionals try and explain that no, the bot’s “simple” equations are incorrect.  "There are no "my" equations; there are only the proper equations.  Your "simplifications" based on your obviously limited knowledge of astrodynamics do not suffice.  I've given you the hint:  you must consider the natural logarithm of the ratio of start and end masses.” Again, hilarious. Just making up its own calculations with no connection to reality.

3) Lastly, the bot is so stupid it can’t even tell the difference between

2400^2 - 1500^2 = 3,510,000

And this

(2400-1500)^2 = 810,000

All of this crazy, incorrect data is what the bot uses to “judge” entries to some non-challenge. It’s like being the judge of a spelling bee and telling a contestant they lost because they spelled a word according to the dictionary and not according to the judge's “simplified” spelling. Pure insanity.
Thanks for bringing the thread back to topic - manned space flight fuel consumption. I pay you €1M if you can calculate the fuel consumed for a return flight from Earth to the Moon, Mars and an Assteroid. I look forward to your calculations and style for transfer of the prize money.

The bot would actually have to start with the correct calculations in order to judge. Considering that the bot is an idiot and didn't even start with the correct ones, there is no challenge.
You sound like a loser of the Challenge insulting the judge.

I'm insulting a bot.

The bot doesn't seem to understand that it's using its own made up incorrect calculations. Literally saying 2+2=5. If anyone doesn't use the bot's incorrect calculations then the judge-bot will deem it a loss. That's not a challenge. The bot can't start with a wrong calculations and expect someone using the right calculations to win.
The challenge is not a challenge. It's based on a false made-up premise from the get-go.

As evidenced by the bot's inability to use the correct math:

1) The bot kicks off its own “simplified” fuel calculations with, "Evidently it changes when fuel is consumed - but I keep it constant”. Absolutely hilarious. Calculations based upon no change in mass due to fuel consumption pretty much blows up the bot’s entire premise right out of the starting gate.

2) Astrodynamics professionals try and explain that no, the bot’s “simple” equations are incorrect.  "There are no "my" equations; there are only the proper equations.  Your "simplifications" based on your obviously limited knowledge of astrodynamics do not suffice.  I've given you the hint:  you must consider the natural logarithm of the ratio of start and end masses.” Again, hilarious. Just making up its own calculations with no connection to reality.

3) Lastly, the bot is so stupid it can’t even tell the difference between

2400^2 - 1500^2 = 3,510,000

And this

(2400-1500)^2 = 810,000

This challenge is invalid. Period.
You still sound like a loser of the Challenge insulting the judge.

#### Stash

• Ethical Stash
• 13398
• I am car!
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14111 on: February 24, 2022, 12:55:26 AM »
My favorite parts from the bot are:

1) The bot kicks off its own “simplified” fuel calculations with, "Evidently it changes when fuel is consumed - but I keep it constant…”. Absolutely hilarious. Calculations based upon no change in mass due to fuel consumption pretty much blows up the bot’s entire premise right out of the starting gate.

2) Astrodynamics professionals try and explain that no, the bot’s “simple” equations are incorrect.  "There are no "my" equations; there are only the proper equations.  Your "simplifications" based on your obviously limited knowledge of astrodynamics do not suffice.  I've given you the hint:  you must consider the natural logarithm of the ratio of start and end masses.” Again, hilarious. Just making up its own calculations with no connection to reality.

3) Lastly, the bot is so stupid it can’t even tell the difference between

2400^2 - 1500^2 = 3,510,000

And this

(2400-1500)^2 = 810,000

All of this crazy, incorrect data is what the bot uses to “judge” entries to some non-challenge. It’s like being the judge of a spelling bee and telling a contestant they lost because they spelled a word according to the dictionary and not according to the judge's “simplified” spelling. Pure insanity.
Thanks for bringing the thread back to topic - manned space flight fuel consumption. I pay you €1M if you can calculate the fuel consumed for a return flight from Earth to the Moon, Mars and an Assteroid. I look forward to your calculations and style for transfer of the prize money.

The bot would actually have to start with the correct calculations in order to judge. Considering that the bot is an idiot and didn't even start with the correct ones, there is no challenge.
You sound like a loser of the Challenge insulting the judge.

I'm insulting a bot.

The bot doesn't seem to understand that it's using its own made up incorrect calculations. Literally saying 2+2=5. If anyone doesn't use the bot's incorrect calculations then the judge-bot will deem it a loss. That's not a challenge. The bot can't start with a wrong calculations and expect someone using the right calculations to win.
The challenge is not a challenge. It's based on a false made-up premise from the get-go.

As evidenced by the bot's inability to use the correct math:

1) The bot kicks off its own “simplified” fuel calculations with, "Evidently it changes when fuel is consumed - but I keep it constant”. Absolutely hilarious. Calculations based upon no change in mass due to fuel consumption pretty much blows up the bot’s entire premise right out of the starting gate.

2) Astrodynamics professionals try and explain that no, the bot’s “simple” equations are incorrect.  "There are no "my" equations; there are only the proper equations.  Your "simplifications" based on your obviously limited knowledge of astrodynamics do not suffice.  I've given you the hint:  you must consider the natural logarithm of the ratio of start and end masses.” Again, hilarious. Just making up its own calculations with no connection to reality.

3) Lastly, the bot is so stupid it can’t even tell the difference between

2400^2 - 1500^2 = 3,510,000

And this

(2400-1500)^2 = 810,000

This challenge is invalid. Period.
You still sound like a loser of the Challenge insulting the judge.

As expected, still just a bot response. The bot is an idiot. There's nothing to lose as the bot is using an incorrect made-up calculation. As referenced above. No one can lose a challenge that isn't a challenge at all because the starting premise is wrong. The bot doesn't even know that depleting mass MUST be factored in. And the bot can't even perform basic middle school math.

The bot got this wrong:

3) Lastly, the bot is so stupid it can’t even tell the difference between

2400^2 - 1500^2 = 3,510,000

And this

(2400-1500)^2 = 810,000

The "challenge" is moot. There is nothing to lose as there is no challenge. Maybe it's time to update the bot so it isn't so stupid.

#### Heiwa

• 10394
• I have been around a long time.
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14112 on: February 24, 2022, 03:02:02 AM »

My favorite parts from the bot are:

1) The bot kicks off its own “simplified” fuel calculations with, "Evidently it changes when fuel is consumed - but I keep it constant…”. Absolutely hilarious. Calculations based upon no change in mass due to fuel consumption pretty much blows up the bot’s entire premise right out of the starting gate.

2) Astrodynamics professionals try and explain that no, the bot’s “simple” equations are incorrect.  "There are no "my" equations; there are only the proper equations.  Your "simplifications" based on your obviously limited knowledge of astrodynamics do not suffice.  I've given you the hint:  you must consider the natural logarithm of the ratio of start and end masses.” Again, hilarious. Just making up its own calculations with no connection to reality.

3) Lastly, the bot is so stupid it can’t even tell the difference between

2400^2 - 1500^2 = 3,510,000

And this

(2400-1500)^2 = 810,000

All of this crazy, incorrect data is what the bot uses to “judge” entries to some non-challenge. It’s like being the judge of a spelling bee and telling a contestant they lost because they spelled a word according to the dictionary and not according to the judge's “simplified” spelling. Pure insanity.
Thanks for bringing the thread back to topic - manned space flight fuel consumption. I pay you €1M if you can calculate the fuel consumed for a return flight from Earth to the Moon, Mars and an Assteroid. I look forward to your calculations and style for transfer of the prize money.
[/quote]

The bot would actually have to start with the correct calculations in order to judge. Considering that the bot is an idiot and didn't even start with the correct ones, there is no challenge.
[/quote]
You sound like a loser of the Challenge insulting the judge.
[/quote]

I'm insulting a bot.

The bot doesn't seem to understand that it's using its own made up incorrect calculations. Literally saying 2+2=5. If anyone doesn't use the bot's incorrect calculations then the judge-bot will deem it a loss. That's not a challenge. The bot can't start with a wrong calculations and expect someone using the right calculations to win.
The challenge is not a challenge. It's based on a false made-up premise from the get-go.

As evidenced by the bot's inability to use the correct math:

1) The bot kicks off its own “simplified” fuel calculations with, "Evidently it changes when fuel is consumed - but I keep it constant”. Absolutely hilarious. Calculations based upon no change in mass due to fuel consumption pretty much blows up the bot’s entire premise right out of the starting gate.

2) Astrodynamics professionals try and explain that no, the bot’s “simple” equations are incorrect.  "There are no "my" equations; there are only the proper equations.  Your "simplifications" based on your obviously limited knowledge of astrodynamics do not suffice.  I've given you the hint:  you must consider the natural logarithm of the ratio of start and end masses.” Again, hilarious. Just making up its own calculations with no connection to reality.

3) Lastly, the bot is so stupid it can’t even tell the difference between

2400^2 - 1500^2 = 3,510,000

And this

(2400-1500)^2 = 810,000

This challenge is invalid. Period.
[/quote]
You still sound like a loser of the Challenge insulting the judge.
[/quote]

As expected, still just a bot response. The bot is an idiot. There's nothing to lose as the bot is using an incorrect made-up calculation. As referenced above. No one can lose a challenge that isn't a challenge at all because the starting premise is wrong. The bot doesn't even know that depleting mass MUST be factored in. And the bot can't even perform basic middle school math.

The bot got this wrong:

3) Lastly, the bot is so stupid it can’t even tell the difference between

2400^2 - 1500^2 = 3,510,000

And this

(2400-1500)^2 = 810,000

The "challenge" is moot. There is nothing to lose as there is no challenge. Maybe it's time to update the bot so it isn't so stupid.
[/quote]
You still sound like a loser of the Challenge insulting the judge.

?

#### frenat

• 3752
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14113 on: February 24, 2022, 03:37:39 AM »
My favorite parts from the bot are:

1) The bot kicks off its own “simplified” fuel calculations with, "Evidently it changes when fuel is consumed - but I keep it constant…”. Absolutely hilarious. Calculations based upon no change in mass due to fuel consumption pretty much blows up the bot’s entire premise right out of the starting gate.

2) Astrodynamics professionals try and explain that no, the bot’s “simple” equations are incorrect.  "There are no "my" equations; there are only the proper equations.  Your "simplifications" based on your obviously limited knowledge of astrodynamics do not suffice.  I've given you the hint:  you must consider the natural logarithm of the ratio of start and end masses.” Again, hilarious. Just making up its own calculations with no connection to reality.

3) Lastly, the bot is so stupid it can’t even tell the difference between

2400^2 - 1500^2 = 3,510,000

And this

(2400-1500)^2 = 810,000

All of this crazy, incorrect data is what the bot uses to “judge” entries to some non-challenge. It’s like being the judge of a spelling bee and telling a contestant they lost because they spelled a word according to the dictionary and not according to the judge's “simplified” spelling. Pure insanity.
Thanks for bringing the thread back to topic - manned space flight fuel consumption. I pay you €1M if you can calculate the fuel consumed for a return flight from Earth to the Moon, Mars and an Assteroid. I look forward to your calculations and style for transfer of the prize money.

The bot would actually have to start with the correct calculations in order to judge. Considering that the bot is an idiot and didn't even start with the correct ones, there is no challenge.
You sound like a loser of the Challenge insulting the judge.
Pointing out the FACT that the judge/bot had the calculations wrong is not an insult. Just a FACT.

#### Heiwa

• 10394
• I have been around a long time.
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14114 on: February 24, 2022, 05:01:25 AM »

Pointing out the FACT that the judge/bot had the calculations wrong is not an insult. Just a FACT.
You still sound like a loser of the Challenge insulting the judge.

?

#### frenat

• 3752
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14115 on: February 24, 2022, 07:30:21 AM »

Pointing out the FACT that the judge/bot had the calculations wrong is not an insult. Just a FACT.
You still sound like a loser of the Challenge insulting the judge.

Not the same person and still not an insult. This makes sound even more like a bot.

Prove you're a real person or go away. Bet you won't even try

?

#### Themightykabool

• 10469
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14116 on: February 24, 2022, 07:39:53 AM »
feb 24 and aaaaallls well

#### boydster

• Assistant to the Regional Manager
• Planar Moderator
• 17757
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14117 on: February 24, 2022, 08:52:06 AM »
Stash cracked the code...

#### Wolvaccine

• EXTRA SPICY MODE
• 25833
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14118 on: February 24, 2022, 02:42:55 PM »
The "challenge" is moot. There is nothing to lose as there is no challenge. Maybe it's time to update the bot so it isn't so stupid.

Maybe it's time to just ban the bot. The mods delete bots all the time. Why keep this one?

Quote from: sokarul
what website did you use to buy your wife? Did you choose Chinese over Russian because she can't open her eyes to see you?

What animal relates to your wife?

#### boydster

• Assistant to the Regional Manager
• Planar Moderator
• 17757
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14119 on: February 24, 2022, 04:53:17 PM »
He has a very popular thread

#### Heiwa

• 10394
• I have been around a long time.
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14120 on: February 24, 2022, 08:50:06 PM »
The "challenge" is moot. There is nothing to lose as there is no challenge. Maybe it's time to update the bot so it isn't so stupid.

Maybe it's time to just ban the bot. The mods delete bots all the time. Why keep this one?
Well, maybe it isn't a bot! And the topic is fascinating. How  much fuel is required to fly to the Moon, Mars and an assteroid? It seems nobody has the answer.

#### Stash

• Ethical Stash
• 13398
• I am car!
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14121 on: February 24, 2022, 11:59:08 PM »
The "challenge" is moot. There is nothing to lose as there is no challenge. Maybe it's time to update the bot so it isn't so stupid.

Maybe it's time to just ban the bot. The mods delete bots all the time. Why keep this one?
Well, maybe it isn't a bot! And the topic is fascinating. How  much fuel is required to fly to the Moon, Mars and an assteroid? It seems nobody has the answer.

Plenty of folks have the answer. You, however, do not. As it's been shown that your calculations are made-up by you and aren't even close to the correct ones.

1) The Heiwabot kicks off its own “simplified” fuel calculations with, "Evidently it changes when fuel is consumed - but I keep it constant…”. Absolutely hilarious. Calculations based upon no change in mass due to fuel consumption pretty much blows up the bot’s entire premise right out of the starting gate.

2) Astrodynamics professionals try and explain that no, the bot’s “simple” equations are incorrect.  "There are no "my" equations; there are only the proper equations.  Your "simplifications" based on your obviously limited knowledge of astrodynamics do not suffice.  I've given you the hint:  you must consider the natural logarithm of the ratio of start and end masses.” Again, hilarious. Just making up its own calculations with no connection to reality.

3) Lastly, the Heiwabot is so stupid it can’t even tell the difference between

2400^2 - 1500^2 = 3,510,000

And this

(2400-1500)^2 = 810,000

All of this crazy, incorrect data is what the bot uses to “judge” entries to some non-challenge. It’s like being the judge of a spelling bee and telling a contestant they lost because they spelled a word according to the dictionary and not according to the judge's “simplified” spelling. Pure insanity.

#### Wolvaccine

• EXTRA SPICY MODE
• 25833
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14122 on: February 25, 2022, 12:47:48 AM »
The "challenge" is moot. There is nothing to lose as there is no challenge. Maybe it's time to update the bot so it isn't so stupid.

Maybe it's time to just ban the bot. The mods delete bots all the time. Why keep this one?
Well, maybe it isn't a bot! And the topic is fascinating. How  much fuel is required to fly to the Moon, Mars and an assteroid? It seems nobody has the answer.

Well you never asked what kind of fuel..... It would take about 10 grams of antimatter to get to Mars. Another 10 to get back. So, say you loaded up a spaceship with 1kg of antimatter. It should be more than enough to not only get to Mars, but go for a jaunt around every planet in the solar system. It should also only take a matter of months, not many years to do so.

Now I'm pretty sure if we can load a Saturn V rocket with millions of litres of kerosene and liquid oxygen (combined), we can fit 1kg of antimatter somewhere

Quote from: sokarul
what website did you use to buy your wife? Did you choose Chinese over Russian because she can't open her eyes to see you?

What animal relates to your wife?

#### Heiwa

• 10394
• I have been around a long time.
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14123 on: February 25, 2022, 12:58:29 AM »
The "challenge" is moot. There is nothing to lose as there is no challenge. Maybe it's time to update the bot so it isn't so stupid.

Maybe it's time to just ban the bot. The mods delete bots all the time. Why keep this one?
Well, maybe it isn't a bot! And the topic is fascinating. How  much fuel is required to fly to the Moon, Mars and an assteroid? It seems nobody has the answer.

Well you never asked what kind of fuel..... It would take about 10 grams of antimatter to get to Mars. Another 10 to get back. So, say you loaded up a spaceship with 1kg of antimatter. It should be more than enough to not only get to Mars, but go for a jaunt around every planet in the solar system. It should also only take a matter of months, not many years to do so.

Now I'm pretty sure if we can load a Saturn V rocket with millions of litres of kerosene and liquid oxygen (combined), we can fit 1kg of antimatter somewhere
Fuel or energy? My Challenge is also how to get it off the ground from Earth. Antimatter? What a joke.

#### Wolvaccine

• EXTRA SPICY MODE
• 25833
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14124 on: February 25, 2022, 01:28:11 AM »
The "challenge" is moot. There is nothing to lose as there is no challenge. Maybe it's time to update the bot so it isn't so stupid.

Maybe it's time to just ban the bot. The mods delete bots all the time. Why keep this one?
Well, maybe it isn't a bot! And the topic is fascinating. How  much fuel is required to fly to the Moon, Mars and an assteroid? It seems nobody has the answer.

Well you never asked what kind of fuel..... It would take about 10 grams of antimatter to get to Mars. Another 10 to get back. So, say you loaded up a spaceship with 1kg of antimatter. It should be more than enough to not only get to Mars, but go for a jaunt around every planet in the solar system. It should also only take a matter of months, not many years to do so.

Now I'm pretty sure if we can load a Saturn V rocket with millions of litres of kerosene and liquid oxygen (combined), we can fit 1kg of antimatter somewhere
Fuel or energy? My Challenge is also how to get it off the ground from Earth. Antimatter? What a joke.

Why is antimatter a joke? The science is sound

Quote from: sokarul
what website did you use to buy your wife? Did you choose Chinese over Russian because she can't open her eyes to see you?

What animal relates to your wife?

#### Heiwa

• 10394
• I have been around a long time.
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14125 on: February 25, 2022, 04:36:59 AM »
The "challenge" is moot. There is nothing to lose as there is no challenge. Maybe it's time to update the bot so it isn't so stupid.

Maybe it's time to just ban the bot. The mods delete bots all the time. Why keep this one?
Well, maybe it isn't a bot! And the topic is fascinating. How  much fuel is required to fly to the Moon, Mars and an assteroid? It seems nobody has the answer.

Well you never asked what kind of fuel..... It would take about 10 grams of antimatter to get to Mars. Another 10 to get back. So, say you loaded up a spaceship with 1kg of antimatter. It should be more than enough to not only get to Mars, but go for a jaunt around every planet in the solar system. It should also only take a matter of months, not many years to do so.

Now I'm pretty sure if we can load a Saturn V rocket with millions of litres of kerosene and liquid oxygen (combined), we can fit 1kg of antimatter somewhere
Fuel or energy? My Challenge is also how to get it off the ground from Earth. Antimatter? What a joke.

Why is antimatter a joke? The science is sound
No, according science antimatter doesn't exist.

#### Wolvaccine

• EXTRA SPICY MODE
• 25833
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14126 on: February 25, 2022, 04:38:38 AM »
The "challenge" is moot. There is nothing to lose as there is no challenge. Maybe it's time to update the bot so it isn't so stupid.

Maybe it's time to just ban the bot. The mods delete bots all the time. Why keep this one?
Well, maybe it isn't a bot! And the topic is fascinating. How  much fuel is required to fly to the Moon, Mars and an assteroid? It seems nobody has the answer.

Well you never asked what kind of fuel..... It would take about 10 grams of antimatter to get to Mars. Another 10 to get back. So, say you loaded up a spaceship with 1kg of antimatter. It should be more than enough to not only get to Mars, but go for a jaunt around every planet in the solar system. It should also only take a matter of months, not many years to do so.

Now I'm pretty sure if we can load a Saturn V rocket with millions of litres of kerosene and liquid oxygen (combined), we can fit 1kg of antimatter somewhere
Fuel or energy? My Challenge is also how to get it off the ground from Earth. Antimatter? What a joke.

Why is antimatter a joke? The science is sound
No, according science antimatter doesn't exist.

Where is your source for that load of shit?

Quote from: sokarul
what website did you use to buy your wife? Did you choose Chinese over Russian because she can't open her eyes to see you?

What animal relates to your wife?

#### Heiwa

• 10394
• I have been around a long time.
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14127 on: February 25, 2022, 04:39:57 AM »
The "challenge" is moot. There is nothing to lose as there is no challenge. Maybe it's time to update the bot so it isn't so stupid.

Maybe it's time to just ban the bot. The mods delete bots all the time. Why keep this one?
Well, maybe it isn't a bot! And the topic is fascinating. How  much fuel is required to fly to the Moon, Mars and an assteroid? It seems nobody has the answer.

Well you never asked what kind of fuel..... It would take about 10 grams of antimatter to get to Mars. Another 10 to get back. So, say you loaded up a spaceship with 1kg of antimatter. It should be more than enough to not only get to Mars, but go for a jaunt around every planet in the solar system. It should also only take a matter of months, not many years to do so.

Now I'm pretty sure if we can load a Saturn V rocket with millions of litres of kerosene and liquid oxygen (combined), we can fit 1kg of antimatter somewhere
Fuel or energy? My Challenge is also how to get it off the ground from Earth. Antimatter? What a joke.

Why is antimatter a joke? The science is sound
No, according science antimatter doesn't exist.

Where is your source for that load of shit?
Wikipedia.

#### Wolvaccine

• EXTRA SPICY MODE
• 25833
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14128 on: February 25, 2022, 04:57:11 AM »
The "challenge" is moot. There is nothing to lose as there is no challenge. Maybe it's time to update the bot so it isn't so stupid.

Maybe it's time to just ban the bot. The mods delete bots all the time. Why keep this one?
Well, maybe it isn't a bot! And the topic is fascinating. How  much fuel is required to fly to the Moon, Mars and an assteroid? It seems nobody has the answer.

Well you never asked what kind of fuel..... It would take about 10 grams of antimatter to get to Mars. Another 10 to get back. So, say you loaded up a spaceship with 1kg of antimatter. It should be more than enough to not only get to Mars, but go for a jaunt around every planet in the solar system. It should also only take a matter of months, not many years to do so.

Now I'm pretty sure if we can load a Saturn V rocket with millions of litres of kerosene and liquid oxygen (combined), we can fit 1kg of antimatter somewhere
Fuel or energy? My Challenge is also how to get it off the ground from Earth. Antimatter? What a joke.

Why is antimatter a joke? The science is sound
No, according science antimatter doesn't exist.

Where is your source for that load of shit?
Wikipedia.

Nothing in the wikipedia article about antimatter supports your claims that antimatter doesn't exist.

Try again

Quote from: sokarul
what website did you use to buy your wife? Did you choose Chinese over Russian because she can't open her eyes to see you?

What animal relates to your wife?

#### Heiwa

• 10394
• I have been around a long time.
##### Re: I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge
« Reply #14129 on: February 25, 2022, 06:14:22 AM »
The "challenge" is moot. There is nothing to lose as there is no challenge. Maybe it's time to update the bot so it isn't so stupid.

Maybe it's time to just ban the bot. The mods delete bots all the time. Why keep this one?
Well, maybe it isn't a bot! And the topic is fascinating. How  much fuel is required to fly to the Moon, Mars and an assteroid? It seems nobody has the answer.

Well you never asked what kind of fuel..... It would take about 10 grams of antimatter to get to Mars. Another 10 to get back. So, say you loaded up a spaceship with 1kg of antimatter. It should be more than enough to not only get to Mars, but go for a jaunt around every planet in the solar system. It should also only take a matter of months, not many years to do so.

Now I'm pretty sure if we can load a Saturn V rocket with millions of litres of kerosene and liquid oxygen (combined), we can fit 1kg of antimatter somewhere
Fuel or energy? My Challenge is also how to get it off the ground from Earth. Antimatter? What a joke.

Why is antimatter a joke? The science is sound
No, according science antimatter doesn't exist.

Where is your source for that load of shit?
Wikipedia.

Nothing in the wikipedia article about antimatter supports your claims that antimatter doesn't exist.

Try again
I thought you suggested that antimatter as fuel/energy could fly you to the Moon to win my €1M Challenge.