I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge

It's terrible that someone as bright as you is forced to live in government housing for the poor people who are also bad at physics.  I didn't know until a few posts ago how destitute your situation really is.  And that you were too proud to admit you didn't have the money.

So I tell you what I'm going to do.  I'll do the €1B challenge for realzies this time.  With that money you can get out of the poor house and into a nice apartment, no more cat food for you every night!

All you have to do is prove to me that man never went to the moon and you're now a billion pounds richer.  All your semi homeless meth addicted crack whores are going to be so jealous of you!

Sorry, I do not live in some government (?) housing. I live in a private building owned by me and others. I own the biggest appartment on the top with a roof garden since 1980. Very nice place. Great view of the Mediterranen sea below.

You have misunderstood my Challenge - you shall just describe a manned spacetrip to the Moon/Mars and fuel used, etc, + how the toilet works. I don't care about your challenge.

Re "All your semi homeless meth addicted crack whores are going to be so jealous of you!" - are you allright? You sound sick!

The Moon and Mars are useless if you want to protect humanity from extinction. Alpha Centauri is the ultimate goal.

Allow me to explain,

My design for an other-solarsystem-worthy space ship is an 8x2 mile long cast cylinder designed to carry an ecological biome to another world in order to aid in the latter stages of terraformation.

It's secondary purpose is to act as a lynchpin weapons platform which hypothetically could annihilate an entire planet's fleet of military spacecraft and weapons platforms with its innumerable arsenal of extremely high-yield gigaton and teraton nuclear weapons, along with casaba howiter laser weapons that could vaporize distant solid targets from tens of thousands of miles away instantaneously; should the colony which constructed it feel existentially threatened.

It utilizes nuclear pulse propulsion by way of fusion bombs which when ejected emit a conically shaped thermonuclear detonation that impacts against a massive nanocarbon-coated (or just refined graphite) ablation plate of tungsten and titanium which absorbs the kinetic energy of the aforementioned blast through a system of shocks in order to afford the ship forward thrust... which theoretically overtime should allow for acceleration towards an upper maximum velocity of 0.25C; or 46,500 miles per second. Potentially greater if anti-matter catalyzed bomblets were developed in tandem with significant modifications being made to the ship's structure, fuselage and various component systems in order to endure such power output and stresses during relativistic travel approaching or exceeding 0.50C.

Anti-matter catalyzed bomblets  have practically the same explosive properties as a thermonuclear explosion, except that the device which would be ejected from the rear of the ablation plate could be many many times smaller, which equates to greatly extended pulse magazine capacity.

Feel free to ask questions.
 

Allow me to address your next concern, HEIWA, that I might not be impartial enough to judge your entries.  Consider this:

A.  I'm obviously smarter than you.  Which is not to say that I'm a super genius, it's just that when you believe in a moon landing conspiracy...

B.  In this thread.  I have lied far less times than you have.  I can't even begin to count the lies I've seen in the first ten pages.  I just stopped counting.  Therefore I am vastly more honest.

C.  I actually have the money.  But I'm well aware that there's no way you could even count to a billion.  But I'm not going to short you here if you win and I'll actually fork over the entire thing.

So there you go.  Honest.

WooHoo!!  We did it!  200 pages!

Hm, moon landing conspiracy? What are you talking about? Topic is my Challenge to describe space trips to Moon/Mars including landings, etc, but it is not a conspiracy. It is fun.

I am a well known person questioning past historic events - http://heiwaco.com . Some examples:

The ATOMIC BOMBS 1945. I consider them simple propaganda to scare you. I explain also why! The ATOMIC BOMBS do not work. But how do I know it? Study my website about Wismut AG. Wismut produced the uranium to Stalin ... but it never happened. Just propaganda.

The JURI GAGARIN 1961 space trip orbiting Earth. I consider Juri communist propaganda. I explain also why! He could never re-enter!

The 911 WTC collapses "live on TV" 2001. I consider them simple propaganda to impress you. I explain also why! Weak tops of structures cannot destroy the strong bottoms keeping them up.

The M/S ESTONIA visor loss 1994. I consider it just a government invention to hide a real crime. I explain also why! Take your time and study it.

One reason why I do above is to help children understand what is going on. Children ask me about a-bombs, space travel, structural collapses and accidents at sea, etc, and I tell them what I think about it. They love it. It is not what other people tell them.

I also question the FUSION ON EARTH plant just being built no far from me (North of Aix en Provence). They are building a monstrous building saying they will start fusion inside it in a couple of years ... and cool it with water from a small canal nearby. What a joke. Fusion is only possible inside the Sun at the centre of our Solar system.

Considering the stakes I would vote to at least keep the thread afloat long enough allowing the OP a chance to verify and win his claim. If someone else happens to step in with a winning claim, well...?

With all do respect good sir he attempted in the first quarter of this thread many moons ago. He gave up when he realized the contest was rigged, there was no money, and a complete waste of time.

Many other people have attempted to reason with the person posting up this "challenge" (and I use the term loosely). All have come to the same conclusion of the challenge being a fraud and the organizer being a liar and a crank. Not too mention, the said prize does not even exist unless you would like monopoly money...and even then you may not receive it.

If this were an actual contest, with actual rules, with actual funds, and people just have not been able to win it due entirely of its complexity and difficulty level ...I would completely agree with you.


Yet you have a user that is abusing this site to spam is own internet site, abusing this site for his own egoistical gain, and abusing this site while verbally abusing it's members without any foundation. To me I would believe the mods and admin of this site would find this to be grounds of banning such a member at the maximum...at the minimum to put a stop to such a damaging thread.

Also from a back end point of view, this thread may be viewed as a asset to the site because of it high view and post level. However, it is all negative attention. Would you want someone to come here and see such a lying parasite get such attention?

This site already promotes a non mainstream theory and world outlook, so there is not room for such a damaging person at this stage of the theory. People like this remove all credibility from theories even if there is water behind it....I believe this too is something the people responsible for this site would not desire.

So please, I ask you to review your decision and subsequent position in this matter...I feel that with such a review, there is enough evidence to support my conclusion along with anyone else who has battled in this thread position to lock the thread.

One reason why I do above is to help children understand what is going on. Children ask me about a-bombs, space travel, structural collapses and accidents at sea, etc, and I tell them what I think about it. They love it. It is not what other people tell them.

Sure, Aesop and Hans Christian Andersen found that children, and even many adults, just love fairy stories!


Seems much like the "I can't understand the Globe, so the earth must be flat" that we seem to get from many Flat Earthers.

I am afraid that neither has any validity at all.

The Moon and Mars are useless if you want to protect humanity from extinction. Alpha Centauri is the ultimate goal.

Allow me to explain,

My design for an other-solarsystem-worthy space ship is an 8x2 mile long cast cylinder designed to carry an ecological biome to another world in order to aid in the latter stages of terraformation.

It's secondary purpose is to act as a lynchpin weapons platform which hypothetically could annihilate an entire planet's fleet of military spacecraft and weapons platforms with its innumerable arsenal of extremely high-yield gigaton and teraton nuclear weapons, along with casaba howiter laser weapons that could vaporize distant solid targets from tens of thousands of miles away instantaneously; should the colony which constructed it feel existentially threatened.

It utilizes nuclear pulse propulsion by way of fusion bombs which when ejected emit a conically shaped thermonuclear detonation that impacts against a massive nanocarbon-coated (or just refined graphite) ablation plate of tungsten and titanium which absorbs the kinetic energy of the aforementioned blast through a system of shocks in order to afford the ship forward thrust... which theoretically overtime should allow for acceleration towards an upper maximum velocity of 0.25C; or 46,500 miles per second. Potentially greater if anti-matter catalyzed bomblets were developed in tandem with significant modifications being made to the ship's structure, fuselage and various component systems in order to endure such power output and stresses during relativistic travel approaching or exceeding 0.50C.

Anti-matter catalyzed bomblets  have practically the same explosive properties as a thermonuclear explosion, except that the device which would be ejected from the rear of the ablation plate could be many many times smaller, which equates to greatly extended pulse magazine capacity.

Feel free to ask questions.

Very interesting design....however there is a flaw I fear. The reliance of said propulsion system on concussive force.

With an atmosphere this is a feasible design...in a vacuum not so much. On earth most of the destructive power from a nuclear device comes from the concussive backlash of the atmosphere responding to such a massive amount of heat in such a small amount of time (then of course the fall out afterwards but leaving this out).

In a vacuum this would not exist.... detonate a nuclear device in space and you will have a really really hot area for a minute...a very bright flash of light...then all will be well again.

Very interesting concept though....

Considering the stakes I would vote to at least keep the thread afloat long enough allowing the OP a chance to verify and win his claim. If someone else happens to step in with a winning claim, well...?

Evidently you haven't been reading this thread.  Anders has made it abundantly clear that his "challenge" is a farce and that he has no intention of ever declaring a winner.

Quote from: gotham on October 02, 2016, 03:19:16 AM

Considering the stakes I would vote to at least keep the thread afloat long enough allowing the OP a chance to verify and win his claim. If someone else happens to step in with a winning claim, well...?

Evidently you haven't been reading this thread.  Anders has made it abundantly clear that his "challenge" is a farce and that he has no intention of ever declaring a winner.

Just the first of many replies that will agree with my post#5976 on this thread.

If you could please reevaluate all evidence and available information that determined your position. I really think you will find our opinion validated.

Please end this cancerous tumor here...YOU have the power!!

Quote from: gotham on October 02, 2016, 03:19:16 AM

Considering the stakes I would vote to at least keep the thread afloat long enough allowing the OP a chance to verify and win his claim. If someone else happens to step in with a winning claim, well...?

Evidently you haven't been reading this thread.  Anders has made it abundantly clear that his "challenge" is a farce and that he has no intention of ever declaring a winner.

Hm, have I? Many posters call me an idiot, etc, but I try to reply to all serious posts. The Challenge is fun because you need to apply rocket science to win it ... and everybody knows rocket science is a farce, hoax, pseudoscience, etc, etc. promoted by well paid (€9000/months for life) shills of many nationalities as proven by this thread.

My main occupation seems to declare them losers all the time. It is quite fun.

Quote from: markjo on October 02, 2016, 09:52:16 AM

Quote from: gotham on October 02, 2016, 03:19:16 AM

Considering the stakes I would vote to at least keep the thread afloat long enough allowing the OP a chance to verify and win his claim. If someone else happens to step in with a winning claim, well...?

Evidently you haven't been reading this thread.  Anders has made it abundantly clear that his "challenge" is a farce and that he has no intention of ever declaring a winner.

Hm, have I? Many posters call me an idiot, etc, but I try to reply to all serious posts. The Challenge is fun because you need to apply rocket science to win it ... and everybody knows rocket science is a farce, hoax, pseudoscience, etc, etc. promoted by well paid (€9000/months for life) shills of many nationalities as proven by this thread.

My main occupation seems to declare them losers all the time. It is quite fun.

Have you contacted Airbus to discuss your beliefs?

ManyAll posters call me an idiot

Helping you with your typo bud....no thank you is needed.

Very interesting design....however there is a flaw I fear. The reliance of said propulsion system on concussive force.

With an atmosphere this is a feasible design...in a vacuum not so much. On earth most of the destructive power from a nuclear device comes from the concussive backlash of the atmosphere responding to such a massive amount of heat in such a small amount of time (then of course the fall out afterwards but leaving this out).

In a vacuum this would not exist.... detonate a nuclear device in space and you will have a really really hot area for a minute...a very bright flash of light...then all will be well again.

Very interesting concept though....

Put simply, no, no, no, that is entirely wrong.

The nuclear pulse propulsion concept doesn't necessarily rely on the concussive wave of an exploding nuclear device, but rather the shaped directed charge of particles resultant from that explosion which will be hitting the ablation plate at several hundred thousand miles per hour upon detonation.

Cumulatively, this translates to a massive transferal of kinetic energy from the pushed ablation plate into the shocks which are subsequently compressed as the craft is moved forward.

The same concept applies to rockets in a vacuum, newton's third law. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. In other words the force of the rocket pushes itself. Whether or not that takes place in an atmosphere or in a vacuum is completely irrelevant. Hence why objects bear the same mass on within a micro-gravity/zero-gravity environment upon impact with other objects as they would with on earth. Gravity just mediates the severity of such an impact's force when falling, but velocity in space performs the same action.

Though the concept of Project Orion wouldn't and likely never would be 100% efficient (if even 80-90% efficient), the mechanism by which it would attain its maximum potential velocity relative to the speed of light is by an order of magnitude MUCH more efficient than rockets today are in reaching hypersonic velocities either in the atmosphere or in vacuum.

The key is in energy density. Chemical fuels simply do not and never will have that potential... aside of nuclear salt water rockets or hydrogen fusion propulsion designs, but neither of those latter achieve propulsion by combustion, but rather through sustaining fission or fusion which are entirely different from chemical processes.


Our very in-depth conversations on technology and space are awesome... it really enriches me, and I appreciate that.

I think you will like reading the following articles. However unfortunate it may be that their funding was cut a long time ago. It could have given a Saturn-type rocket the push it needed to reach mars in a fraction of the time than possible with chemical engines.

American
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NERVA <- Tested, completed all tasks and was a success.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Rover <- Used NERVA engine.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Timberwind <- Was suppose to be a refined version of NERVA, no test engines were build.

Russian
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RD-0410

Quote from: Heiwa on October 01, 2016, 11:39:29 AM

Just ask my stock broker about the money.

Certainly. Please provide a name and address and I will write to them. You can PM me if you like.

Also, be sure to tell your stockbroker that you are happy to allow disclosure of your stock holdings.

The above post of mine yesterday was serious. So...

Many posters call me an idiot, etc, but I try to reply to all serious posts.

Please post or PM me the name and address of your stockbroker so that I can ask them about the money, as per your suggestion.

Quote from: Copper Knickers on October 01, 2016, 02:14:09 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on October 01, 2016, 11:39:29 AM

Just ask my stock broker about the money.

Certainly. Please provide a name and address and I will write to them. You can PM me if you like.

Also, be sure to tell your stockbroker that you are happy to allow disclosure of your stock holdings.

The above post of mine yesterday was serious. So...

Quote from: Heiwa on October 02, 2016, 11:22:24 AM

Many posters call me an idiot, etc, but I try to reply to all serious posts.

Please post or PM me the name and address of your stockbroker so that I can ask them about the money, as per your suggestion.

Sorry, your post is miles off topic. Topic here is simple rocket science, e.g. how to apply a force (N) to your manned spacecraft (with a certain mass (kg)) in orbit around Earth to fly off in the right direction to arrive at the Moon and planet Mars.

If you can answer that simple question and tell me the energy/fuel required, you are one the way to win my Challenge. But you cannot! You are a loser.

You think rocket science is science but it is pseudoscience. You suffer from cognitive dissonance of serious dimensions. 

Isn't it funny? You are sick ... and not really aware of it.

Heiwa, if you have to resort to name calling then you've already lost the argument.

Quote from: Copper Knickers on October 02, 2016, 02:23:24 PM

Quote from: Copper Knickers on October 01, 2016, 02:14:09 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on October 01, 2016, 11:39:29 AM

Just ask my stock broker about the money.

Certainly. Please provide a name and address and I will write to them. You can PM me if you like.

Also, be sure to tell your stockbroker that you are happy to allow disclosure of your stock holdings.

The above post of mine yesterday was serious. So...

Quote from: Heiwa on October 02, 2016, 11:22:24 AM

Many posters call me an idiot, etc, but I try to reply to all serious posts.

Please post or PM me the name and address of your stockbroker so that I can ask them about the money, as per your suggestion.

Sorry, your post is miles off topic. Topic here is simple rocket science, e.g. how to apply a force (N) to your manned spacecraft (with a certain mass (kg)) in orbit around Earth to fly off in the right direction to arrive at the Moon and planet Mars.

If you can answer that simple question and tell me the energy/fuel required, you are one the way to win my Challenge. But you cannot! You are a loser.

You think rocket science is science but it is pseudoscience. You suffer from cognitive dissonance of serious dimensions. 

Isn't it funny? You are sick ... and not really aware of it.

Holy shit.....I just....cannot stand these asinine post anymore....I just died a little bit more on the inside. Something more must be done to stop this...

Heiwa, if you have to resort to name calling then you've already lost the argument.

Not really! I play medical doctor and diagnose a serious illness (cd) that plenty twerps suffer from today.

My Challenge is clear. Explain a manned trip to the Moon! And plenty people get upset because it has already been done 1969 and need not be explained 2016, they believe.

I know it wasn't done 1969. What was done was a big propaganda show of something looking like a manned trip to the Moon. It wasn't badly done.

Same with the a-bombs 1945. Of course the Japanese towns were destroyed by bombing but not by a-bombs. In war propaganda is very easy to use to fool people.

Same with the 911 WTC destructions 2001. Of course the towers were destroyed but not by young Arabs landing planes in the weak top floors.

Same with the M/S Estonia sinking 1994. The ship sank due to leakage/sabotage and the authorities thought that they could blame it on the visor.

I explain all these strange stories at my website - http://heiwaco.com . I find them fascinating.

I've been to my doctor, and I don't have cognitive dissonance, or any major mental illness of any kind.

I've been to my doctor, and I don't have cognitive dissonance, or any major mental illness of any kind.

Sorry, you have made >24 posts/day since joining here 18 July 2016 and most of them indicate you are sick. Did you mention them to your doctor?

Nope. I allowed him to do actual tests on me.because he is an actual doctor.

Nope. I allowed him to do actual tests on me.because he is an actual doctor.

Your doctor tested you to confirm that you are sane? How much did it cost? How you got it in writing? I know it is OT but I am curious. The young person starting this thread finally agreed he was mentally ill suffering from some symdrome, poor sod.

Quote from: origamiscienceguy on October 02, 2016, 06:00:36 PM

Nope. I allowed him to do actual tests on me.because he is an actual doctor.

Your doctor tested you to confirm that you are sane? How much did it cost? How you got it in writing? I know it is OT but I am curious. The young person starting this thread finally agreed he was mentally ill suffering from some symdrome, poor sod.

Doesn't mean he didn't win your "challenge". Suffering from a syndrome does not prevent someone from being correct. You claim to be sane but many of the things you've written here and on your site are completely wrong. That said, your inability to see that might suggest something about your mental state to a psychiatrist.

I've got Bipolar, Heiwa, I can still see through your BS, now go make fun of mental illness some more to make yourself feel better about the mess of a life you made for yourself.

200 pages guys, come on, I mean come on.

I don't know anything about mental diseases, but I know that my doctor who can talk to me knows more about it than you.

I don't know anything about mental diseases, but I know that my doctor who can talk to me knows more about it than you.

But did you really ask your doctor to check that you were sane and not suffering from cognitive dissonance?
Cognitive dissonance refers to a situation involving conflicting attitudes, beliefs or behaviors. This produces a feeling of discomfort leading to an alteration in one of the attitudes, beliefs or behaviors to reduce the discomfort and restore balance etc.
For example, when people believe in human space travel (behavior) and they know that cosmic radiation kills the person (cognition).
One way to reduce the dissonance is to reduce the importance of the cognitions (i.e. beliefs, attitudes) or better verify your beliefs. There is nor reason to attack me in various ways. I am just a friendly guy trying to help.

I know that you're too stupid to realize this, and you are too stubborn to comprehend what people are trying to say to you, but nobody here takes you seriously. Nothing you say has any weight. You're a proven liar, a fraud, a thief, and above all, an idiot. The only way that you can convince yourself that you are smart is to convince yourself that everybody in the world.is mentally ill except for you.

I know that you're too stupid to realize this, and you are too stubborn to comprehend what people are trying to say to you, but nobody here takes you seriously. Nothing you say has any weight. You're a proven liar, a fraud, a thief, and above all, an idiot. The only way that you can convince yourself that you are smart is to convince yourself that everybody in the world.is mentally ill except for you.

Yes, I know people consider me stupid, etc, etc.
But no, I am not a liar, fraud, thief and idiot.
I have a great and fun life and no problems of any kind - social, health, economical, etc.
I am in great shape. Like my mother who is 97.
OK, her legs are a little weak. I will see her mid-October when we will empty a bottle of Chateau du Tailhas, POMEROL, 2013, together with some good food. They say it, the wine, is good.
It is a Bordeaux. A bottle of a grand vin Bordeaux a day keeps the doctor away, as they say.
You are definetly sick. 

6000 posts ... and no Winner of my Challenge.

I wonder why!

BECAUSE IT'S BEEN RIGGED BY A LYING CROOK WHO CAN'T EVEN GET THE BASICS RIGHT

How's that?

Quote from: Heiwa on October 03, 2016, 08:37:05 AM

6000 posts ... and no Winner of my Challenge.

I wonder why!

BECAUSE IT'S BEEN RIGGED BY A LYING CROOK WHO CAN'T EVEN GET THE BASICS RIGHT

How's that?

No. I didn't start the thread about the Challenge. And the Challenge is real. Like me! Registered voter, taxpayer, popular citizen, home owner, rich, good looking, sporty, healthy, etc, etc.

But I agree - rocket science is not my turf. Like all pseudosciences.