If you think I am going to spend hundreds of hours planning and designing missions to the Moon and Mars, it is not going to happen. Simply because the information how space travel is done is readily available, it has been done and is available online, the formulas conform with the current understanding of physics that have been consistently proven, and I do not think your challenge is legitimate.
If you prove you have the funds and appoint an unbiased judge then I will reconsider.
The Challenge is just to provide the information in the rules at http://heiwaco.com/chall.htm .
I know of course that information how space travel is done is readily available and available online and that some formulas conform with the current understanding of physics have been proven, etc, etc. The Challenge is not to tell me that. I know how Arianespace sends up satellites. That is easy.
The Challenge is to use that information and, e.g. calculate the fuel used to leave Earth for Moon and Mars with humans aboard. I assume you need a bigger spacecraft going to Mars, which require more fuel. According my calculations you do not get off the ground and if you get off the ground you really need a big amount of fuel to leave Earth orbit, say 250 000 kg, for a minimal space craft with no facilities.
Some people believe that I, an educated, successful engineer living comfortably in a big appartement do not believe in space travel. That is incorrect. What I do not believe in is human space travel, i.e. sending humans up into space. It is a 100% kamikaze trip as you cannot return, re-enter and land.
As nobody has won my Challenge since many years, it seems I am right.
OK, NASA faked it 1969 but it was at the request of corrupt politicians and military fools. It seems they are still running the show.
The Saturn V carried people to space.
I demonstrated using information you use to claim it was a hoax:
TWR
Amount of propellant needed to get to lunar orbit and back.
The velocity change the Saturn V was capable of.
The amount of propellant burned per second and the resulting velocity change.
Thrust(indirectly, being an engineer you should be able to have noticed that rather easily, it is also found easily with a internet search, it is even answered on your site)
The above took gravity, mass and air pressure into account.
Using your model:
Navigating and orientating spacecraft is possible since satellites can be maneuvered and placed in the orbits they need to be in.
The calculations I used are correct since I used the same ones used to get satellites into orbit.
So I showed you using information you provide and use and your site that the Saturn V was capable of doing what we were told it did.
Why not just show us your calculations for the Saturn V's TWR, velocity change it was capable of that you have done?
The only calculation I have seen from you regarding stuff like this ignored the energy added to the system by the rocket exhaust. The other was jut adding the total mass of the fuel and then basically said it was a lot and therefore evidence that the Saturn V was fake.
Going to claim this is off topic? You are the one who continues to bring the above topics up. Like saying the Saturn V could not get off the pad and no one can or has been able to tell you the amount of propellant needed.