It's the babyhighspeed heiwa challenge needed to make sure it was all in bold so you knew it was a challenge apparently. Maybe I am just itching for a Vegas trip, though I feel this has higher odds than any casino game.
I hate it when trolls prevent actual knowledge from expanding. Only crap thing is if he is telling the truth. That means have to still put up with him AND lose something valuable .least we would know his ramblings are truthful. Then maybe I can hit him up for the rest of the funding of this rocket I am trying to finish and put up so we can see the earth lol.
I have got to agree with you. I am not bothered people questioning things and investigating what they are told to see if it is true. It does bother me when during that investigation they ignore the stuff that says they are wrong, make false claims to bolster their view, and then make an effort to spread their disinformation to the public.
It is the reason I post in forums like these. My hope someone on the verge going down a similar path as Heiwa will be swayed and realize Heiwa has a very limited understanding of the subject matter and can not provide evidence.
I am pretty confident nothing I can do that will change Heiwa's mind on the matter. He has demonstrated that here and in other forums by ignoring the glaring flaws in his calculations and physics models that has been pointed out. His response when they are usually is one or a combination of ad hominem, incredulity and dismissal.
If he is a troll then he does not realize or care his actions may convince others he is right and take them down the rabbit hole many conspiracy theorist go into.
If he is sincere then I am a little more understanding and he really needs to look up and consider who is suffering from cognitive dissonance. He gives a warning to people about it on his web site and they may not want to continue reading. Funny how he is the one that shows the signs of it.
@Heiwa:
1. Two different sets of physics involved for manned and unmanned spacecraft.
2. Drag and lift do not exist if something went to space.
3. Highly elliptical orbits only result in crashing back to Earth if the orbit would result in an encounter with the moon.
4. Your model say gravity can alter the velocity of something, yet gravity assist are impossible.
5. Calculations used to get a satellite in orbit can not be used for any other spacecraft especially ones with people on board.
6. The Earth, moon and sun have the equal or close to the same amount of gravitational influence between the Earth and moon.
7. Points of reference can not be used in space.
8. Telemetry used for satellites can not be used to navigate anything going to the moon or beyond. Angles can not be measured in space.
9. The energy added by rocket exhaust is not important to consider and does not need to be included in formulas.
10. It is impossible to navigate in 3-d space when things like planes and submarines do it.
11. NASA does not make information available to you, yet myself and others find it relatively easily using a search engine.
12. Things almost instantaneous vaporize when entering the atmosphere yet meteors have hit the Earth if they happen to enter at the right angles. They also are likely traveling at much higher speeds than required to orbit the Earth. One reason they can make it to the surface is ablation which you claim does not work.
13. Blast furnaces can reach temperatures of around 1,800 °C and built to withstand it, yet nothing can be done to withstand the heat of reentry.