I know a lot about impacts and collisions and dynamic and static structural analysis.
No you don't. You simply misrepresent yourself as a qualified structural and/or mechanical engineer on an
ad hoc basis dependent on the given scenario. You also say—arrogantly but irrelevantly—many times on your sites: "
I am just a very friendly, healthy, intelligent and generous person trying to clear up confusion" that's allegedly aimed at you by your detractors. Simply being friendly or healthy or generous does not make your alleged engineering qualifications any more credible Björkman. More likely it makes it look as though you're desperate for people to believe in the bovine excrement you plaster all over your worthless sites. "
Oh... Anders is a nice friendly guy; he must be telling the truth".
The impacts and collisions take time and there are always local structural damages in the interface in the collision/impact zone. I even got an oil tanker design approved by the United Nations based on study of impacts/collisions.
Nope.
Major misrepresentation of the "facts" here Björkman. I quote a transcript from the U.S. House of Representatives, Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, dated 25 June 1998:
"Mr. GILCHREST [
Chairman of the subcommittee]: Is there any other alternative technologies out there that IMO [
UN International Maritime Organization] has looked into?
Admiral NORTH [
Assistant & Commandant for Marine Safety & Environmental Protection US Coast Guard]: IMO currently accepts double hull, mid-deck, and so-called
Coulombi Egg designs, but again, they give more credit, so to speak, to median outflow and
don't hold their performance standard to a pure zero outflow criteria like we do.
Mr. GILCHREST: Do you think that there will ever come a time when we might find some alternative technology that will prove at least
as good or safer than double hulls?
Admiral NORTH: The Coast Guard would be happy to look at any design that
claims to provide the same kind of zero outflow performance that we see double-hulls providing.
Admiral NORTH: There is
nothing presently that we have found that matches the double-hull for the probability of zero outflow. We have looked at a number of designs; we did a report to Congress, currently in clearance that talks about some of those. There have been other designs brought up that were not considered in that report and we have yet to find one that matches the double-hull from that perspective in terms of probability of zero outflow.
Admiral NORTH: For zero outflow,
the double-hull is the best we have seen, to date."
—As a result, The US Coast Guard would not allow this design of vessel to enter US waters, and thus
no ships of this design have ever been constructed. It's just another part in the many of Björkman's fairy stories that have virtually zero basis in fact. And it should be noted that Björkman has been unsuccessfully trying to "sell" this Coulombi Egg design for more than
23 years!