I won Heiwa's €1,000,000 challenge

Quote from: Rama Set on January 27, 2015, 12:13:10 PM

Heiwa is not a FEer

Maybe not, but his knowledge of geophysics and astrophysics, and the mechanics of tidal forces is so lacking he may as well be a FE'r for all practical purposes.  If you read the nonsensical rubbish and outright lies he posts HERE on his less-than-popular sites, you'd see why any self-respecting RE'r would be embarrassed to mention his name in public as being (supposedly) a round earther.   
   

Preaching to the choir Geoffro. Read other posts sometime.

Quote from: Rama Set on January 28, 2015, 01:08:57 PM

Preaching to the choir Geoffro. Read other posts sometime.

Yeah... I know mate.   

It just seems worth it to me to repeat over and again how nonsensical Björkman and his site's contents are, as too many people—particularly FEs—seem prepared to grant him a modicum of credibility, rather than calling him out for the clown he is.

Except I'm not deluded, and realize that they're automated visits - which explains why nobody spends more than a minute or two on your popular dive.

Quote from: ausGeoff on January 28, 2015, 03:23:04 PM

Quote from: Rama Set on January 28, 2015, 01:08:57 PM

Preaching to the choir Geoffro. Read other posts sometime.

Yeah... I know mate.   

It just seems worth it to me to repeat over and again how nonsensical Björkman and his site's contents are, as too many people—particularly FEs—seem prepared to grant him a modicum of credibility, rather than calling him out for the clown he is.

According reliable statistics my site had 546 visitors/day the past 30 days and it appears most visitors are very happy. I have recieved only two impolite, anonymous mails from unhappy visitors past 30 days. It seems very few visitors are coming from FE forum though.

Most popular subpage is http://heiwaco.com/news8.htm about the M/S Costa Concordia incidents 13/14 January 2012 and the trial of the innocent Master, whose ship acidentally contacted something hidden below the surface of the sea one evening and the next day capsized and sank due to being unseaworthy.
 
The criminal court at Grosseto/Italy is a circus, where plenty clowns can be seen.

Quote from: Arith on January 29, 2015, 04:11:51 AM

Except I'm not deluded, and realize that they're automated visits - which explains why nobody spends more than a minute or two on your popular dive.

The robot is programmed to spend an automited minute or two on my popular dive? Why would anyone do this?

A Web crawler is an Internet bot that systematically browses the World Wide Web, typically for the purpose of Web indexing. A Web crawler may also be called a Web spider,[1] an ant, an automatic indexer,[2] or (in the FOAF software context) a Web scutter.[3]

Web search engines and some other sites use Web crawling or spidering software to update their web content or indexes of others sites' web content. Web crawlers can copy all the pages they visit for later processing by a search engine that indexes the downloaded pages so that users can search them much more quickly.

Crawlers can validate hyperlinks and HTML code. They can also be used for web scraping (see also data-driven programming).

Quote from: Heiwa on January 29, 2015, 05:27:50 AM

Quote from: Arith on January 29, 2015, 04:11:51 AM

Except I'm not deluded, and realize that they're automated visits - which explains why nobody spends more than a minute or two on your popular dive.

The robot is programmed to spend an automited minute or two on my popular dive? Why would anyone do this?

Quote from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_crawler

A Web crawler is an Internet bot that systematically browses the World Wide Web, typically for the purpose of Web indexing. A Web crawler may also be called a Web spider,[1] an ant, an automatic indexer,[2] or (in the FOAF software context) a Web scutter.[3]

Web search engines and some other sites use Web crawling or spidering software to update their web content or indexes of others sites' web content. Web crawlers can copy all the pages they visit for later processing by a search engine that indexes the downloaded pages so that users can search them much more quickly.

Crawlers can validate hyperlinks and HTML code. They can also be used for web scraping (see also data-driven programming).

Quote from: markjo on January 29, 2015, 10:53:56 AM

Quote from: Heiwa on January 29, 2015, 05:27:50 AM

Quote from: Arith on January 29, 2015, 04:11:51 AM

Except I'm not deluded, and realize that they're automated visits - which explains why nobody spends more than a minute or two on your popular dive.

The robot is programmed to spend an automited minute or two on my popular dive? Why would anyone do this?

Quote from: /wiki/Web_crawler

A Web crawler is an Internet bot that systematically browses the World Wide Web, typically for the purpose of Web indexing. A Web crawler may also be called a Web spider,[1] an ant, an automatic indexer,[2] or (in the FOAF software context) a Web scutter.[3]

Web search engines and some other sites use Web crawling or spidering software to update their web content or indexes of others sites' web content. Web crawlers can copy all the pages they visit for later processing by a search engine that indexes the downloaded pages so that users can search them much more quickly.

Crawlers can validate hyperlinks and HTML code. They can also be used for web scraping (see also data-driven programming).

The search engines visit my site to assist their clients - to find me. To down load and record a page takes less than a second. I can program the statistics application to ignore these search engines visits, etc.  No big deal.  But 50% of my visitors find me anyway. My good reputation is all over the www. It has been suggested to put ads on the pages and earn money but it will disturb the attention of the visitors. I like my clean, good loooking pages with correct and valuable info.

Plenty useless clowns are jealous and wet their pants about it. Terrible, isn't?

BTW - noone has won my Challenge yet. Send in your application with full info.

Quote from: markjo on January 29, 2015, 10:53:56 AM

Quote from: Heiwa on January 29, 2015, 05:27:50 AM

Quote from: Arith on January 29, 2015, 04:11:51 AM

Except I'm not deluded, and realize that they're automated visits - which explains why nobody spends more than a minute or two on your popular dive.

The robot is programmed to spend an automited minute or two on my popular dive? Why would anyone do this?

Quote from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_crawler

A Web crawler is an Internet bot that systematically browses the World Wide Web, typically for the purpose of Web indexing. A Web crawler may also be called a Web spider,[1] an ant, an automatic indexer,[2] or (in the FOAF software context) a Web scutter.[3]

Web search engines and some other sites use Web crawling or spidering software to update their web content or indexes of others sites' web content. Web crawlers can copy all the pages they visit for later processing by a search engine that indexes the downloaded pages so that users can search them much more quickly.

Crawlers can validate hyperlinks and HTML code. They can also be used for web scraping (see also data-driven programming).

The search engines visit my site to assist their clients - to find me. To down load and record a page takes less than a second. I can program the statistics application to ignore these search engines visits, etc.  No big deal.  But 50% of my visitors find me anyway. My good reputation is all over the www. It has been suggested to put ads on the pages and earn money but it will disturb the attention of the visitors. I like my clean, good loooking pages with correct and valuable info.

Plenty useless clowns are jealous and wet their pants about it. Terrible, isn't?

BTW - noone has won my Challenge yet. Send in your application with full info.

Heiwa - where is the evidence for your "good reputation"? You aren't known anywhere on the web except for on a few conspiracy forums, and even amongst those you're either banned and/or exposed as a pathalogical liar with little grasp of the subjects you discuss.
I've seen few uglier looking websites than yours, and no matter how many times you call it "popular" you aren't fooling anyone. Then again, maybe you aren't as deluded as you would have us believe, and you're just baiting. In which case, great trolling.

Quote from: Mastermind on January 29, 2015, 04:00:26 PM

Heiwa - where is the evidence for your "good reputation"? You aren't known anywhere on the web except for on a few conspiracy forums, and even amongst those you're either banned and/or exposed as a pathalogical liar with little grasp of the subjects you discuss.
I've seen few uglier looking websites than yours, and no matter how many times you call it "popular" you aren't fooling anyone. Then again, maybe you aren't as deluded as you would have us believe, and you're just baiting. In which case, great trolling.

Hm, you are just jealous, blind and a halfwit. Nobody has shown anything wrong with the info I publish. Try yourself! Copy/paste anything from my site and show it is a lie! You cannot.

According reliable statistics my site had 546 visitors/day the past 30 days and it appears most visitors are very happy. I have received only two impolite, anonymous mails from unhappy visitors past 30 days. It seems very few visitors are coming from FE forum though.

Quote from: markjo on January 29, 2015, 10:53:56 AM

Quote from: Heiwa on January 29, 2015, 05:27:50 AM

Quote from: Arith on January 29, 2015, 04:11:51 AM

Except I'm not deluded, and realize that they're automated visits - which explains why nobody spends more than a minute or two on your popular dive.

The robot is programmed to spend an automited minute or two on my popular dive? Why would anyone do this?

Quote from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_crawler

A Web crawler is an Internet bot that systematically browses the World Wide Web, typically for the purpose of Web indexing. A Web crawler may also be called a Web spider,[1] an ant, an automatic indexer,[2] or (in the FOAF software context) a Web scutter.[3]

Web search engines and some other sites use Web crawling or spidering software to update their web content or indexes of others sites' web content. Web crawlers can copy all the pages they visit for later processing by a search engine that indexes the downloaded pages so that users can search them much more quickly.

Crawlers can validate hyperlinks and HTML code. They can also be used for web scraping (see also data-driven programming).

The search engines visit my site to assist their clients - to find me. To down load and record a page takes less than a second. I can program the statistics application to ignore these search engines visits, etc.  No big deal.  But 50% of my visitors find me anyway. My good reputation is all over the www. It has been suggested to put ads on the pages and earn money but it will disturb the attention of the visitors. I like my clean, good loooking pages with correct and valuable info.

Plenty useless clowns are jealous and wet their pants about it. Terrible, isn't?

BTW - noone has won my Challenge yet. Send in your application with full info.

Mr. bjorkman uses the same tactic as propaganda in totalitarian countries. He thinks that if he yells loudly enough, and says everything with complete conviction, people will eventually believe him.

Quote from: kman on January 30, 2015, 06:17:39 AM

Mr. bjorkman uses the same tactic as propaganda in totalitarian countries. He thinks that if he yells loudly enough, and says everything with complete conviction, people will eventually believe him.

Weirdly, that just what mainstream science does. They corner the market in bull crap.
You people attack Heiwa's site because it scares you. I don't agree with everything Heiwa says but his site is very informative and gives food for thought for anyone that takes their time to look at it.

This site is simply an attack site for you people. You have no interest in finding the truth about anything other than what has already been ingrained into you by pre/post school indoctrination.

Why don't some of you take a time out and actually look at alternatives, instead of sticking to your given subjects. You might find it more interesting if you can use your logical brains and common sense for a while.

Quote from: kman on January 30, 2015, 06:17:39 AM

Mr. bjorkman uses the same tactic as propaganda in totalitarian countries. He thinks that if he yells loudly enough, and says everything with complete conviction, people will eventually believe him.

Weirdly, that just what mainstream science does. They corner the market in bull crap.
You people attack Heiwa's site because it scares you. I don't agree with everything Heiwa says but his site is very informative and gives food for thought for anyone that takes their time to look at it.

This site is simply an attack site for you people. You have no interest in finding the truth about anything other than what has already been ingrained into you by pre/post school indoctrination.

Why don't some of you take a time out and actually look at alternatives, instead of sticking to your given subjects. You might find it more interesting if you can use your logical brains and common sense for a while.

Scepti, Anders is a lot like you in that he's long on criticizing the mainstream but short on providing evidence that supports his own opinions.

Quote from: kman on January 30, 2015, 06:17:39 AM

Mr. bjorkman uses the same tactic as propaganda in totalitarian countries. He thinks that if he yells loudly enough, and says everything with complete conviction, people will eventually believe him.

Weirdly, that just what mainstream science does. They corner the market in bull crap.
You people attack Heiwa's site because it scares you. I don't agree with everything Heiwa says but his site is very informative and gives food for thought for anyone that takes their time to look at it.

This site is simply an attack site for you people. You have no interest in finding the truth about anything other than what has already been ingrained into you by pre/post school indoctrination.

Why don't some of you take a time out and actually look at alternatives, instead of sticking to your given subjects. You might find it more interesting if you can use your logical brains and common sense for a while.

@Heiwa

I see your email est en Français, donc tu dois pouvoir lit ce phrase facilement! T' habites là, mais je pense que tu es un menteur avec votre faux argents, questions-réponses, et bravade. Je là habite et je ce veux t'exposer!

^^ this part hasn't been translated correctly by iTranslate, Google, Bab, or Babylon Translate let's see how fake you might be, down to the email. If you really lived in France though, this shouldn't be terrible to read!^^

Now for my English portion!

Heiwa, your nuke section is entirely invalid as I, as a nuclear engineer, have expertise enough to discredit your Lyssenko claims. Not only that, since I may be lying due to this being the internet, but seismology, the evolution of plant and fauna, detectable radiation, measurable EMF disruption, and Japanese testimony describing a massive cloud all discredit you.

Not only this, but the US didn't create an atom bomb to display technological superiourity over Russia, but did it for Germany and to force an end to conflict with Japan. Your Lysenko (you made a typo) argument doesn't even hold water as there's no evidence the family controlled the collective knowledge of multiple nations.

Quote from: kman on January 30, 2015, 06:17:39 AM

Mr. bjorkman uses the same tactic as propaganda in totalitarian countries. He thinks that if he yells loudly enough, and says everything with complete conviction, people will eventually believe him.

Weirdly, that just what mainstream science does. They corner the market in bull crap.

You people attack Heiwa's site because it scares you.

I don't agree with everything Heiwa says...

This site is simply an attack site for you people. You have no interest in finding the truth about anything other than what has already been ingrained into you by pre/post school indoctrination.

you are a nuke engineer!?  I don't believe it. Prove it!

I am just a friendly, honest guy.

I like correct info.

Quote from: Orifiel on January 30, 2015, 08:32:15 AM

@Heiwa

I see your email est en Français, donc tu dois pouvoir lit ce phrase facilement! T' habites là, mais je pense que tu es un menteur avec votre faux argents, questions-réponses, et bravade. Je là habite et je ce veux t'exposer!

^^ this part hasn't been translated correctly by iTranslate, Google, Bab, or Babylon Translate let's see how fake you might be, down to the email. If you really lived in France though, this shouldn't be terrible to read!^^

Now for my English portion!

Heiwa, your nuke section is entirely invalid as I, as a nuclear engineer, have expertise enough to discredit your Lyssenko claims. Not only that, since I may be lying due to this being the internet, but seismology, the evolution of plant and fauna, detectable radiation, measurable EMF disruption, and Japanese testimony describing a massive cloud all discredit you.

Not only this, but the US didn't create an atom bomb to display technological superiourity over Russia, but did it for Germany and to force an end to conflict with Japan. Your Lysenko (you made a typo) argument doesn't even hold water as there's no evidence the family controlled the collective knowledge of multiple nations.

Bon nuit.

you are a nuke engineer!?  I don't believe it. Prove it! Then prove that I do not exist, that I lie, that I am not ... anything. Why should I lie? Why?

This thread is getting stranger and stranger with more nuts and wits joining. I am just a friendly, honest guy. Somebody here linked to my popular web site. I publish there what I have found and think is correct. If you do not agree, just explain what you think is wrong.

Forget me! Focus on what you think is right and why my info is wrong. I will change my info/understanding, if it is wrong. No big deal for me. I like correct info. Only way to achieve it, is to discuss it. The info.

Quote from: Orifiel on January 30, 2015, 08:32:15 AM

@Heiwa

I see your email est en Français, donc tu dois pouvoir lit ce phrase facilement! T' habites là, mais je pense que tu es un menteur avec votre faux argents, questions-réponses, et bravade. Je là habite et je ce veux t'exposer!

^^ this part hasn't been translated correctly by iTranslate, Google, Bab, or Babylon Translate let's see how fake you might be, down to the email. If you really lived in France though, this shouldn't be terrible to read!^^

Now for my English portion!

Heiwa, your nuke section is entirely invalid as I, as a nuclear engineer, have expertise enough to discredit your Lyssenko claims. Not only that, since I may be lying due to this being the internet, but seismology, the evolution of plant and fauna, detectable radiation, measurable EMF disruption, and Japanese testimony describing a massive cloud all discredit you.

Not only this, but the US didn't create an atom bomb to display technological superiourity over Russia, but did it for Germany and to force an end to conflict with Japan. Your Lysenko (you made a typo) argument doesn't even hold water as there's no evidence the family controlled the collective knowledge of multiple nations.

Bon nuit.

you are a nuke engineer!?  I don't believe it. Prove it! Then prove that I do not exist, that I lie, that I am not ... anything. Why should I lie? Why?

This thread is getting stranger and stranger with more nuts and wits joining. I am just a friendly, honest guy. Somebody here linked to my popular web site. I publish there what I have found and think is correct. If you do not agree, just explain what you think is wrong.

Forget me! Focus on what you think is right and why my info is wrong. I will change my info/understanding, if it is wrong. No big deal for me. I like correct info. Only way to achieve it, is to discuss it. The info.

Quote from: Heiwa on January 30, 2015, 02:04:54 PM

Quote from: Orifiel on January 30, 2015, 08:32:15 AM

@Heiwa

I see your email est en Français, donc tu dois pouvoir lit ce phrase facilement! T' habites là, mais je pense que tu es un menteur avec votre faux argents, questions-réponses, et bravade. Je là habite et je ce veux t'exposer!

^^ this part hasn't been translated correctly by iTranslate, Google, Bab, or Babylon Translate let's see how fake you might be, down to the email. If you really lived in France though, this shouldn't be terrible to read!^^

Now for my English portion!

Heiwa, your nuke section is entirely invalid as I, as a nuclear engineer, have expertise enough to discredit your Lyssenko claims. Not only that, since I may be lying due to this being the internet, but seismology, the evolution of plant and fauna, detectable radiation, measurable EMF disruption, and Japanese testimony describing a massive cloud all discredit you.

Not only this, but the US didn't create an atom bomb to display technological superiourity over Russia, but did it for Germany and to force an end to conflict with Japan. Your Lysenko (you made a typo) argument doesn't even hold water as there's no evidence the family controlled the collective knowledge of multiple nations.

Bon nuit.

you are a nuke engineer!?  I don't believe it. Prove it! Then prove that I do not exist, that I lie, that I am not ... anything. Why should I lie? Why?

This thread is getting stranger and stranger with more nuts and wits joining. I am just a friendly, honest guy. Somebody here linked to my popular web site. I publish there what I have found and think is correct. If you do not agree, just explain what you think is wrong.

Forget me! Focus on what you think is right and why my info is wrong. I will change my info/understanding, if it is wrong. No big deal for me. I like correct info. Only way to achieve it, is to discuss it. The info.

You didn't answer the French part in a way that made sense with what I said...and it's BONNE NUIT not bon nuit, so I assume your French email isn't representative of where you really live.

It doesn't matter if you believe my engineering background though, as recorded seismic activity during that period recorded a significant disturbance that correlated with the period of supposed detonation. Not only that, but atmospheric Geiger counters (basically) detected increases in radiation to confirm suspicions

Quote from: Orifiel on January 30, 2015, 06:36:54 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on January 30, 2015, 02:04:54 PM

Bon nuit.

you are a nuke engineer!?  I don't believe it. Prove it! Then prove that I do not exist, that I lie, that I am not ... anything. Why should I lie? Why?

This thread is getting stranger and stranger with more nuts and wits joining. I am just a friendly, honest guy. Somebody here linked to my popular web site. I publish there what I have found and think is correct. If you do not agree, just explain what you think is wrong.

Forget me! Focus on what you think is right and why my info is wrong. I will change my info/understanding, if it is wrong. No big deal for me. I like correct info. Only way to achieve it, is to discuss it. The info.

You didn't answer the French part in a way that made sense with what I said...and it's BONNE NUIT not bon nuit, so I assume your French email isn't representative of where you really live.

It doesn't matter if you believe my engineering background though, as recorded seismic activity during that period recorded a significant disturbance that correlated with the period of supposed detonation. Not only that, but atmospheric Geiger counters (basically) detected increases in radiation to confirm suspicions

You are supposed to expose me as a liar. Go ahead and try.
So there was seismic disturbance when an atomic bomb explosed. So IT is your evidence that atomic bombs work. Not very impressive. Or planes collecting radioactive dust in the sky after detonations found radioactivity. Hm, easy to fake.
So why all these funny propaganda films from the 1950's about atomic bomb explosions? Why not show the real thing?
I think my findings at http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm are sufficient to demonstrate that atomic bombs do not work. Aren't you happy? Or do you LOVE atomic bombs (and that they produce seismmic effects?).
Anyway, try to find anything wrong with my web page.
And do no suggest that I lie.