GLOBAL CONSPIRACY

  • 1592 Replies
  • 598905 Views
*

Mikey T.

  • 3546
  • +0/-1
Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1380 on: March 30, 2015, 05:08:29 PM »
...
If the Earth rotated and if the Sun were 92 000 000 miles away, we wouldn't notice ZIGZAG phenomena from ANYWHERE on the Earth, ...
So your whole argument is invalid, got it.

Finally!

Now if we could just get him to recognize that an observer who is rotating will see distant objects move across his field of view, he'll have it!

It's just astonishing that he goes to a lot of trouble setting up experiments to "prove" some irrelevant detail, then goes to more trouble describing a misinterpretation of what he sees, when he could just stand in one place and turn around and see all objects, far and near, move across his field of vision.


He will never admit this.  He will say you are misquoting him.  I am awestruck as to why he still hangs on to this zig zag idea.  I guess he just cannot handle being shown he is wrong about anything.  Seems pretty closed minded to me.  Way to think for yourself there.

?

earth is a stage

  • 150
  • +0/-0
  • etheric
Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1381 on: March 30, 2015, 07:24:25 PM »
Mike, I think the 0.00001% are smarter than the average person. (or at least more knowledgeable in their area of expertise)  This interesting video, shows how the .00001% can control everything, and that includes Nasa!

#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
« Last Edit: March 30, 2015, 07:27:52 PM by earth is a stage »

*

Mikey T.

  • 3546
  • +0/-1
Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1382 on: March 30, 2015, 07:57:08 PM »
Trust me, I'm not the average person.  I'm no better than anyone else, but I'm most definitely not average.  The nice gentleman who puts me in the straight jacket at night told me so.

Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1383 on: March 30, 2015, 08:33:47 PM »
You make a very interesting point Charles.  Our world stands on the brink of a Rothschild's nightmare!  Something really, REALLY bad is going to happen this century. (It seems to me)  I am wondering if Putin may take the Ruble onto the Gold Standard? (If he hasn't already been replaced by a double) Surely we could be close to Nuclear War.
Well jfk tried to bringing a note of worth back in to circulation , to end the privetly owned fedaral reserve & debt notes & debt slavery. Or at least have the intrest put back in to the country, its citizens prosperity & well being , Cost him his life. Putin will probably end the same way .
When it comes to Jane's standards .I'm lower then an old stove she has in her garage.
Shannon Noll and Natalie Bassingthwaighte - Don't…:

?

Alpha2Omega

  • 4107
  • +1/-1
Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1384 on: March 30, 2015, 08:52:27 PM »
Mike, I think the 0.00001% are smarter than the average person. (or at least more knowledgeable in their area of expertise)  This interesting video, shows how the .00001% can control everything, and that includes Nasa!

#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
Wouldn't the 50% be smarter than the average person. Do you know what 'average' means?
"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

*

cikljamas

  • 2466
  • +1/-2
  • Ex nihilo nihil fit
Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1385 on: March 30, 2015, 09:15:20 PM »
Sokarul, it seems that you even believe Moon landings really had occurred, ha?

Enjoy watching my new video : Flat Earth - Apollo lies : " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
"I can't breathe" George Floyd RIP

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1386 on: March 30, 2015, 09:26:22 PM »
I was too busy watching the sun set without getting smaller to watch that video.
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

cikljamas

  • 2466
  • +1/-2
  • Ex nihilo nihil fit
Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1387 on: March 30, 2015, 09:38:43 PM »
I was too busy watching the sun set without getting smaller to watch that video.



How do you manage to watch the sun set keeping you head in the send?
« Last Edit: March 30, 2015, 09:42:37 PM by cikljamas »
"I can't breathe" George Floyd RIP

*

mikeman7918

  • 5431
  • +0/-0
  • Round Earther
Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1388 on: March 30, 2015, 10:03:11 PM »
I was too busy watching the sun set without getting smaller to watch that video.



How do you manage to watch the sun set keeping you head in the send?

How do you manage to remain ignorant enough to believe FET even though the Sun sets?
I am having a video war with Jeranism.
See the thread about it here.

*

dephelis

  • 479
  • +0/-0
  • Sine scientia ars nihil est.
Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1389 on: March 31, 2015, 12:50:36 AM »
I was too busy watching the sun set without getting smaller to watch that video.



How do you manage to watch the sun set keeping you head in the send?

Sokarul isn't the one who ran away from this thread http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=62793.msg1659190#msg1659190.

How is life as an ostrich?

*

cikljamas

  • 2466
  • +1/-2
  • Ex nihilo nihil fit
Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1390 on: March 31, 2015, 06:28:22 AM »
The Moon is a globe, they say:

Model of a Lunar Globe:



Where did i get this photo?

Here (Secretive 'NGA' Satellite Mapping Agency) : https://www.nga.mil/About/History/Apollo%2011/Pages/default.aspx

Interesting theory:

Flight 4U9525: Pentagon Contractor Worked for Secretive 'NGA' Satellite Mapping Agency : " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
"I can't breathe" George Floyd RIP

?

Alpha2Omega

  • 4107
  • +1/-1
Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1391 on: March 31, 2015, 08:23:56 AM »
The Moon is a globe, they say:

Model of a Lunar Globe:

http://i.imgur.com/M8DkUWE.jpg

Where did i get this photo?

Here (Secretive 'NGA' Satellite Mapping Agency) : https://www.nga.mil/About/History/Apollo%2011/Pages/default.aspx

Interesting theory:

Flight 4U9525: Pentagon Contractor Worked for Secretive 'NGA' Satellite Mapping Agency : <youtube link>
The Moon is a globe. It's been mapped. OK. Do you have a point?

What is in the video you linked that would make it worth watching? Your teaser is hardly compelling.
"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

*

cikljamas

  • 2466
  • +1/-2
  • Ex nihilo nihil fit
Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1392 on: March 31, 2015, 02:20:40 PM »
HELIOCENTRICITY IS DEAD: http://www.sanibelcaptivafishing.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Sun-rising-moon-setting-Captiva-nice-photo-2.jpg

http://www.energeticforum.com/254554-post297.html

Why is this agency more secretive than NSA, CIA, FBI altogether?

Beside many other things, they certainly know the real shape of the Earth! Don't they?

This agency is more secretive than NSA, CIA, FBI altogether : " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

A few interesting comments below this video:

-America using the excuse of fighting terrorism that they are behind ton invade ppl's privacy and break just about every law

-We've had high level CIA and NSA whistle-blowers but we've never had a high level Pentagon whistle-blower (only Private Chelsea Manning). Shows you who really pulls the strings. The Pentagon probably whacks them at the first sign of disobedience without batting an eyelash.

-Bin Laden died over 10 years ago from a lung disease...

-'Catching Osama Bin Laden'? Lol. Great liars, too! Google needs to change its motto.
« Last Edit: March 31, 2015, 02:30:00 PM by cikljamas »
"I can't breathe" George Floyd RIP

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1393 on: March 31, 2015, 02:36:31 PM »
I was too busy watching the sun set without getting smaller to watch that video.



How do you manage to watch the sun set keeping you head in the send?
It doesn't work the way you think it works.
HELIOCENTRICITY IS DEAD: http://www.sanibelcaptivafishing.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Sun-rising-moon-setting-Captiva-nice-photo-2.jpg
blah blah blah

The moon set in the east? That would make world headlines. Next time actually look at the picture before you post it. It's not the moon in that picture.
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

?

Alpha2Omega

  • 4107
  • +1/-1
Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1394 on: March 31, 2015, 03:12:53 PM »
HELIOCENTRICITY IS DEAD:
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">AGAIN?

But that trick never works!

Quote
http://www.sanibelcaptivafishing.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Sun-rising-moon-setting-Captiva-nice-photo-2.jpg
Is that even the Moon? It doesn't look like it. How can we know? Is whatever it is rising, or setting? How can we know? What direction are we looking? How can we know?

Quote
<another energeticforum link>

Why is this agency more secretive than NSA, CIA, FBI altogether?
They work with classified data. It says so on their website you linked to in your previous post. I don't know about "more secretive" than those other agencies. They have a website, after all (you linked to it, remember?) Apparently they make classified maps; maybe nobody really cares all that much what they're doing (unlike CIA and NSA), so they "fly under the radar".

Quote
Beside many other things, they certainly know the real shape of the Earth! Don't they?
I'm certain they do. So do about 99.999% of the world's population. That's hardly classified information.
 
Quote
This agency is more secretive than NSA, CIA, FBI altogether : <youtube video>

A few interesting comments below this video:

-America using the excuse of fighting terrorism that they are behind ton invade ppl's privacy and break just about every law

-We've had high level CIA and NSA whistle-blowers but we've never had a high level Pentagon whistle-blower [ ::) ] (only Private Chelsea Manning) [ ::) ]. Shows you who really pulls the strings. The Pentagon probably whacks them at the first sign of disobedience without batting an eyelash.

-Bin Laden died over 10 years ago from a lung disease...

-'Catching Osama Bin Laden'? Lol. Great liars, too! Google needs to change its motto.
Well, if it says that stuff in a youtube video it just has to be true. ::) But what do any of these "revelations" have to do with the shape of the Earth? Of course other youtube videos show the ISS orbiting above an obviously spherical earth, so those have to be the truth too, right?

[Edit] Typo.
« Last Edit: March 31, 2015, 03:15:41 PM by Alpha2Omega »
"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

*

cikljamas

  • 2466
  • +1/-2
  • Ex nihilo nihil fit
"I can't breathe" George Floyd RIP

*

mikeman7918

  • 5431
  • +0/-0
  • Round Earther
Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1396 on: March 31, 2015, 04:12:08 PM »
Did you see this : http://www.energeticforum.com/254554-post297.html

One another photography of that type : http://zaslike.com/files/56q9h77mm39wpv9ulgr.jpg

One another interesting photography : http://www.zaslike.com/files/bkns9zgj088i0snnz0x.jpg

Oops..They get caught....moon and sun together (again) : http://www.panoramio.com/photo/73023528

And again, and again, and again :

http://www.zaslike.com/files/n3jd58guwnj0m9ym81p3.jpg
http://www.zaslike.com/files/8hcbtpe7jebm9c03w546.jpg
http://www.zaslike.com/files/x24sgeg76osfczxxwwwu.jpg
http://www.zaslike.com/files/1f4qesfxbjh3orxv7f5q.jpg
http://www.zaslike.com/files/u2dr44l1jnfer2vmgbhr.jpg

Look at this picture : http://www.reporterherald.com/portlet/article/html/imageDisplay.jsp?contentItemRelationshipId=5860137

Sun is on the horizon, and the upper half of the Moon is eclipsed, what eclipsed the Moon? The Earth?

I say they they are fake.  I am not just saying that because it goes against what I believe, I have a legitimate reason to believe it:

Here is one of your images:


I thought the Sun and Moon appeared to be the same size in the sky, and they both look like they are the same brightness.

Here is another image:


This one looks real at first glance, but the give away has to do with brightness.  Look at the ground in that image and you will notice that it is very dark, you can also see the Sun well enough to make out a disk so clearly this was a short exposure photograph.  Yet the Moon looks nice and bright as if it were taken with a longer exposure at night.  Have you ever seen the Moon in the day?  It's almost overpowered by the brightness of the Sky.  So how does the Moon look so bright in such a short exposure photograph?  Answer: Photoshop.  You can even see a black outline around the Moon where it was cut out of another image and pasted into this one.
I am having a video war with Jeranism.
See the thread about it here.

*

Mikey T.

  • 3546
  • +0/-1
Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1397 on: March 31, 2015, 04:21:46 PM »
Hey mike look at the first image with the two suns.  Check the foreground buildings and the background buildings.  Look at the placement of the sun in respect to both sets of buildings and suns.  Its a picture that is overlaid with a blown up copy of itself, or a zoomed out one, can't decide on which is the lower level of the overlay, but the closer sun looks like it had the cloud covering removed via photoshop. 
But cik never posts fake images... no way.  We must have two suns.

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1398 on: March 31, 2015, 04:24:28 PM »
...

One another photography of that type : http://zaslike.com/files/56q9h77mm39wpv9ulgr.jpg

One another interesting photography : http://www.zaslike.com/files/bkns9zgj088i0snnz0x.jpg
...
You do realize those are long exposures right? You can tell by how much of the dark part of the moon can be seen. Thanks for the round earth pictures.
Also like mikeman said, you probably shouldn't post fake pictures as evidence.
When is the next time the moon and sun can be seen so close together?
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

Mikey T.

  • 3546
  • +0/-1
Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1399 on: March 31, 2015, 04:37:13 PM »
Also the two sun one was a fake photo used on a Nibiru disaster website.  Yep the world ended in 2012.  The other one Mike showed from there is ripped off from Dan Heller photography, they just cropped out the watermark.

Some of the others are sun flare reflections on the camera lenses. 
ZIG ZAG is dead.

?

Alpha2Omega

  • 4107
  • +1/-1
Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1400 on: March 31, 2015, 04:56:09 PM »
Did you see this : http://www.energeticforum.com/254554-post297.html
No. Can you describe in general terms what it says? In the past, all the energeticforum links you have given have been to posts by you that are at least as erroneous as the ones you post here, so an utter waste of time.

Quote
One another photography of that type :

<Apparently links to pictures of sun and/or moon... see comments by others.>

Look at this picture : http://www.reporterherald.com/portlet/article/html/imageDisplay.jsp?contentItemRelationshipId=5860137

Sun is on the horizon, and the upper half of the Moon is eclipsed, what eclipsed the Moon? The Earth?
Why do you say the Sun is on the horizon? Given the lack of distinct shadows as well as the position of earth's shadow on the Moon (yes, that is what's eclipsing the Moon), the Sun is obviously below the horizon. This is a long exposure in twilight soon after sunset and the Moon is emerging from totality as it's rising. This is exactly as you'd expect for this eclipse from Colorado. It's a cool picture. What revelation do you think it's supposed to convey?
"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

*

Mikey T.

  • 3546
  • +0/-1
Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1401 on: March 31, 2015, 05:11:53 PM »
The funny thing is he doesn't know what it means, someone else probably posted something and he fell hook line and sinker, again. 

*

29silhouette

  • 3374
  • +0/-0
Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1402 on: March 31, 2015, 07:16:39 PM »

29silhouette,

If your were right
I am.

(if your argument would make sense)
It does to anyone smart enough to understand it.

 then the Sun would look as if it's an immovable spot in the sky, and it would be so for any observer no matter where he would be placed at the surface of the Earth.
As long as one can track it until the horizon gets in the way at sunset.

If the Earth rotated and if the Sun were 92 000 000 miles away, we wouldn't notice ZIGZAG phenomena from ANYWHERE on the Earth
Wow... That's what we've been telling you for quite some time.

but we wouldn't notice a huge (180 degree) displacement of the Sun (from East to West) in the way it happens in our reality, also!!!
If we rotate from west to east, then the sun rises in the east and sets in the west, so I'm not sure what the issue is.

If the Earth rotated and if the Sun were somewhere between a few thousands and 100 000 km away from the Earth we would notice ZIGZAG phenomena from anywhere on the Earth, except if we were standing at the poles. At the poles the Sun would look as if it's an immovable spot in the sky!
And since we don't notice your zigzag phenomena...

The point is that the Sun is very, very close to the Earth, instead of being so insanely far away as HC ludicrous theory claims that it is.
Then why does it look like it's far away?

If the Earth rotated between 5am-7am and between 5pm-7pm you would move BACK (5pm-7pm) and FORWARD (5am-7am) with respect to the Sun, and between 11am-1pm, and between 11pm-1am you would move LATERALLY with respect to the Sun, that is to say, you would move LEFT TO RIGHT (11pm-1am), and RIGHT TO LEFT (11am-1pm).
Indeed.

The degrees of Sun's displacement in these periods would be drastically different if the Earth rotated!!!
If I understand what you're trying to say... no, it wouldn't.

If the Earth rotated you would have to slightly adjust (every few minutes or so) spatial orientation of your telescope from RIGHT TO LEFT (between 6am-6pm), and from LEFT TO RIGHT (between 6pm-6am). Right?
No. 

But it doesn't happen in reality!!!
Correct.

In reality you adjust spatial orientation of your telescope ALWAYS (24 hours during one Polar Day or one Polar Night) in the SAME direction! Right?
Yes.  This is the result of the sun being 92,000,000 miles away and Earth being a rotating sphere.  You can verify all this with a simple desktop globe.

Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1403 on: April 01, 2015, 12:25:44 AM »
Did you see this : http://www.energeticforum.com/254554-post297.html

One another photography of that type : http://zaslike.com/files/56q9h77mm39wpv9ulgr.jpg

One another interesting photography : http://www.zaslike.com/files/bkns9zgj088i0snnz0x.jpg

Oops..They get caught....moon and sun together (again) : http://www.panoramio.com/photo/73023528

And again, and again, and again :

http://www.zaslike.com/files/n3jd58guwnj0m9ym81p3.jpg
http://www.zaslike.com/files/8hcbtpe7jebm9c03w546.jpg
http://www.zaslike.com/files/x24sgeg76osfczxxwwwu.jpg
http://www.zaslike.com/files/1f4qesfxbjh3orxv7f5q.jpg
http://www.zaslike.com/files/u2dr44l1jnfer2vmgbhr.jpg

Look at this picture : http://www.reporterherald.com/portlet/article/html/imageDisplay.jsp?contentItemRelationshipId=5860137

Sun is on the horizon, and the upper half of the Moon is eclipsed, what eclipsed the Moon? The Earth?

I say they they are fake.  I am not just saying that because it goes against what I believe, I have a legitimate reason to believe it:

Here is one of your images:


I thought the Sun and Moon appeared to be the same size in the sky, and they both look like they are the same brightness.

Here is another image:


This one looks real at first glance, but the give away has to do with brightness.  Look at the ground in that image and you will notice that it is very dark, you can also see the Sun well enough to make out a disk so clearly this was a short exposure photograph.  Yet the Moon looks nice and bright as if it were taken with a longer exposure at night.  Have you ever seen the Moon in the day?  It's almost overpowered by the brightness of the Sky.  So how does the Moon look so bright in such a short exposure photograph?  Answer: Photoshop.  You can even see a black outline around the Moon where it was cut out of another image and pasted into this one.
I cant speak for those photos ,but I can tell you first hand iv seen the sun rise regularly with the moon visible in that positioning . The moon is so often seen in the sky most days with the sun . Young  children  who are in bed before dark fall , dont associate the moon with night time anymore , but instead with day time.
« Last Edit: April 01, 2015, 12:28:16 AM by charles bloomington »
When it comes to Jane's standards .I'm lower then an old stove she has in her garage.
Shannon Noll and Natalie Bassingthwaighte - Don't…:

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1404 on: April 01, 2015, 07:33:28 AM »
Thank you captain obvious. The moon can be seen during the day depending on it's phase. It's just never seen that close to the sun.
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

mikeman7918

  • 5431
  • +0/-0
  • Round Earther
Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1405 on: April 01, 2015, 07:38:59 AM »
I cant speak for those photos ,but I can tell you first hand iv seen the sun rise regularly with the moon visible in that positioning . The moon is so often seen in the sky most days with the sun . Young  children  who are in bed before dark fall , dont associate the moon with night time anymore , but instead with day time.

I said that a full Moon right next to the Sun is impossible, I am not saying that the Moon is never visable in the day, it's usually just a crescent phase when it's visable in the day though.

Thank you captain obvious. The moon can be seen during the day depending on it's phase. It's just never seen that close to the sun.

No, it's just never visable with that phase that close to the Sun.
I am having a video war with Jeranism.
See the thread about it here.

*

cikljamas

  • 2466
  • +1/-2
  • Ex nihilo nihil fit
Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1406 on: April 01, 2015, 08:25:48 AM »
Did you see this : http://www.energeticforum.com/254554-post297.html
No. Can you describe in general terms what it says? In the past, all the energeticforum links you have given have been to posts by you that are at least as erroneous as the ones you post here, so an utter waste of time.

Quote
One another photography of that type :

<Apparently links to pictures of sun and/or moon... see comments by others.>

Look at this picture : http://www.reporterherald.com/portlet/article/html/imageDisplay.jsp?contentItemRelationshipId=5860137

Sun is on the horizon, and the upper half of the Moon is eclipsed, what eclipsed the Moon? The Earth?
Why do you say the Sun is on the horizon? Given the lack of distinct shadows as well as the position of earth's shadow on the Moon (yes, that is what's eclipsing the Moon), the Sun is obviously below the horizon. This is a long exposure in twilight soon after sunset and the Moon is emerging from totality as it's rising. This is exactly as you'd expect for this eclipse from Colorado. It's a cool picture. What revelation do you think it's supposed to convey?

Regarding your first question: Just click on the link : http://www.energeticforum.com/254554-post297.html

As for our "mysterious" Lunar eclipse, let's see it here:



Now, draw me a diagram, and show me how this could be (geometrically possible) on the round Earth?
« Last Edit: April 01, 2015, 08:29:07 AM by cikljamas »
"I can't breathe" George Floyd RIP

*

mikeman7918

  • 5431
  • +0/-0
  • Round Earther
Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1407 on: April 01, 2015, 08:30:29 AM »
As for our "mysterious" Lunar eclipse, let's see it here:



Now, draw me a diagram, and show me how this could be (geometrically possible) on the round Earth?

That is clearly an eclipse and the lack of shadows on the ground suggest that the Sun has just set or is about to rise.  I will draw you a diagram when I get home to my computer.
I am having a video war with Jeranism.
See the thread about it here.

?

earth is a stage

  • 150
  • +0/-0
  • etheric
Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1408 on: April 01, 2015, 09:44:23 AM »
Kansas, flat as a pancake. Not convex, not concave!  I would like to see a serious experiment done, somehow involving an entire continant.
« Last Edit: April 01, 2015, 09:48:46 AM by earth is a stage »

*

mikeman7918

  • 5431
  • +0/-0
  • Round Earther
Re: GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
« Reply #1409 on: April 01, 2015, 09:51:24 AM »
Kansas, flat as a pancake. Not convex, not concave!

That measurement takes curvature into account and it was taken with satellites which supposedly don't exist.

Do you see how easy flat earther claims are to debunk?  I wonder why that is (not really).
I am having a video war with Jeranism.
See the thread about it here.