Firstly, i destroyed them at page 14 - post # 274 :
www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=62346.msg1645003#msg1645003Secondly, i have showed them what they really know about the real distances between "celestial bodies" :
www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=62346.msg1651347#msg1651347Thirdly, i have taught them how utterly destructive impact to heliocentric theory has EOT problem ("Equation of time" problem) :
www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=62346.msg1652537#msg1652537 ...
www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=62346.msg1652537#msg1652537Fourthly, i gave them a lesson about the curvature of the Earth :
www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=62346.msg1653202#msg1653202 ...
www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=62199.msg1640860#msg1640860Then we resumed our discussion on "ZIGZAG argument" which i had started 30 pages back :
www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=62346.msg1653970#msg1653970www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=62346.msg1654399#msg1654399www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=62346.msg1655872#msg1655872Then, i gave them a little summarisation :
www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=62346.1020#.VP-THfIraRsThen, Rory Cooper made (and published yesterday) his video animation of my ZIGZAG argument :
www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=62346.msg1668698#msg1668698Then they completely freaked out :
www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=62346.msg1668839#msg1668839So yes, Flat Earth Society is definetely the controlled opposition!!!
But this can't help them:
They will never recover from this (ZIGZAG argument)...This is what i mean :
www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=62998.msg1667023#msg1667023 ...
www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=62346.msg1660101#msg1660101 ...
www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=62346.msg1645003#msg1645003When we say "Flat Earth concept", what do we really want to designate by these words? With these phrase (FE concept) we want to emphasise that all celestial lights (not bodies) are placed and circle ABOVE us (not AROUND us). That is the essence of that (FE) concept, and that is the fact which i have proven with a little help of my "Day and Night-Tilt" arguments with which you could have acquainted yourself watching these two videos of mine: 1.
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">2.
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">...Next question is something completely different (independent issue) and cannot be used (in any way) as a reason for disputing the essence of FE concept : "What is the exact shape of the surface of the Earth?" True answer to this question has yet to be given :
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=62998.msg1667151#msg1667151 http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=62950.msg1666724#msg1666724One of
Alpha2Omega's comments on these words (link above) was:
"Care to divulge where you heard that "9000 nmi?" It's clearly balderdash."I was already too sick (i had a flu) to participate in this discussion (at that time), so i skipped that question, but had i been in the mood to participate more actively in that discussion this would have been my answer:
I would say that this 9000 nmi must have been (in this old days (150 years ago)) a commonplace-well established fact among sailors! That is why i suppose
Rowbotham states this factual-number (without giving any additional reference or citation) 'just like that', as though it is completely unnecessary to corroborate this information with any other credible source or calling upon any other authority.
Brand new interview with
Mark Sargent :
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">P.S. For those who still can't grasp ZIGZAG argument, here is Rory's video-animation, once more - just for you :
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Enjoy the truth!