« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Sinking effect, not a question trying to prove FE false

  • 42 Replies
  • 6081 Views
?

BOGWarrior89

  • 3793
  • +0/-0
  • We are as one.
Sinking effect, not a question trying to prove FE false
« Reply #30 on: November 08, 2006, 11:14:32 AM »
Quote from: "TheEngineer"
Static friction and static equilibrium are not the same thing.


They are similar, however.
Logged
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Sinking effect, not a question trying to prove FE false
« Reply #31 on: November 08, 2006, 11:17:30 AM »
How so?
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
?

BOGWarrior89

  • 3793
  • +0/-0
  • We are as one.
Sinking effect, not a question trying to prove FE false
« Reply #32 on: November 08, 2006, 11:21:37 AM »
Quote from: "TheEngineer"
How so?


I'm not doing this again.
Logged
?

BOGWarrior89

  • 3793
  • +0/-0
  • We are as one.
Sinking effect, not a question trying to prove FE false
« Reply #33 on: November 08, 2006, 11:22:56 AM »
Quote from: "Erasmus"
For efficiency I think it best to assume that the default response to any of BOGWarrior's posts is stunned incredulity, followed by "Anyway, where were we?"

Quote from: "TheEngineer"
That sounds like a very good plan of action.


What happened to this plan of action?
Logged
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Sinking effect, not a question trying to prove FE false
« Reply #34 on: November 08, 2006, 11:23:08 AM »
Ok, then, I'll just let you know that they are not similar.
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
?

BOGWarrior89

  • 3793
  • +0/-0
  • We are as one.
Sinking effect, not a question trying to prove FE false
« Reply #35 on: November 08, 2006, 11:24:05 AM »
Quote from: "TheEngineer"
Ok, then, I'll just let you know that they are not similar.


Only in your point of view.
Logged
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Sinking effect, not a question trying to prove FE false
« Reply #36 on: November 08, 2006, 11:27:49 AM »
In the point of view of physics, which I thought you were studying.
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
?

Erasmus

  • The Elder Ones
  • 4242
  • +0/-0
Sinking effect, not a question trying to prove FE false
« Reply #37 on: November 08, 2006, 11:59:16 AM »
::display of stunned incredulity::
Logged
Why did the chicken cross the Möbius strip?
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Sinking effect, not a question trying to prove FE false
« Reply #38 on: November 08, 2006, 12:00:06 PM »
Damn! Forgot plan of action.
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
?

BOGWarrior89

  • 3793
  • +0/-0
  • We are as one.
Sinking effect, not a question trying to prove FE false
« Reply #39 on: November 08, 2006, 12:25:09 PM »
Quote from: "Erasmus"
::display of stunned incredulity::

Quote from: "TheEngineer"
Damn! Forgot plan of action.


 :lol:
Logged
?

woopedazz

  • 421
  • +0/-0
Sinking effect, not a question trying to prove FE false
« Reply #40 on: November 08, 2006, 07:46:51 PM »
dont get away from my idea!!! i had a great way to prove it would break the earth apart last nite...but then i went and stuffed my math exam this morning, and forgot it...  :(

umm...well anyways, we agree that the UA exerts different force at different sections of the base of the flat earth...so ill try to figure out what my argument was before and get back to u
Logged
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Sinking effect, not a question trying to prove FE false
« Reply #41 on: November 08, 2006, 08:18:21 PM »
Good luck with that.
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
?

woopedazz

  • 421
  • +0/-0
Sinking effect, not a question trying to prove FE false
« Reply #42 on: November 08, 2006, 08:25:39 PM »
Quote from: "TheEngineer"
Good luck with that.


why thank u kind sir  :)
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »