The anti-moon or "shadow object"

Also the weather patterns on the moon.

There are no "weather patterns" on our moon.  Its atmosphere doesn't support weather as per the standard definition of the word.  There is no wind and no rain.

The flat earthers have yet to explain the dimensions and structure of their "shadow object".  Diameter?  Chemical composition?  Thickness?  Orbit?  Periodicity?  Who discovered it and when?  A citation in any reference books?  Its location on a star map?

C'mon flat earthers... details please.

RE to FE: "How do you explain the lunar eclipse?"

FE to RE: "It is a shadow object but let's speak no more of it!"

RE to FE: "Please explain this thing, I would like some details to better understand your FET"

*crickets chirping*

That pretty much sums it up.

LOL.....

It strikes me as strange that despite constantly referring round earthers to the Flat Earth Wiki for answers to our questions, the flat earthers themselves don't understand its contents.  None of them can define the "shadow object" listed in the Wiki—which itself doesn't present any definition other than to just say "it is".

Quite funny really.   

LOL.....

It strikes me as strange that despite constantly referring round earthers to the Flat Earth Wiki for answers to our questions, the flat earthers themselves don't understand its contents.  None of them can define the "shadow object" listed in the Wiki—which itself doesn't present any definition other than to just say "it is".

Quite funny really.   

That is because this Society are a bunch of trolls. Who can take them serious? It goes beyond every logic, every fact and evidence.
Maybe I will make myself a "The Earth is a 3D triangle" society. It would be as good as this one...

Quote from: ausGeoff on November 09, 2014, 06:32:31 AM

LOL.....

It strikes me as strange that despite constantly referring round earthers to the Flat Earth Wiki for answers to our questions, the flat earthers themselves don't understand its contents.  None of them can define the "shadow object" listed in the Wiki—which itself doesn't present any definition other than to just say "it is".

Quite funny really.   

That is because this Society are a bunch of trolls. Who can take them serious? It goes beyond every logic, every fact and evidence.
Maybe I will make myself a "The Earth is a 3D triangle" society. It would be as good as this one...

You should. The physics of this proposed world would be fascinating. I'm sure you can do better than "bendy light" for example.

My question is .: Do the flat earthers - in particular the moderators -really take anything seriously ?

Or as far as anything concerning a "flat earth"are they really just on this website for the fun and entertainment like the rest of us ? 
Or maybe just to debate ?